Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

Are you now saying you have no conspiracy theory?

Answer or clam up quickly.

The only one clamming up here is you when I ask you to back your claim up.

Please show the quote from yesterday with me on record admitting I have a conspiracy theory.

[Pavlov]

The only one clamming up here is you when I ask you to back your claim up.

Please show the quote from yesterday with me on record admitting I have a conspiracy theory.

My theory has always been this was a set up to frame Trump as colluding with Russians.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9390745

Is this not a conspiracy theory, TSA?

Explain.

[RandomGuy]

I am offering $100 bets that Trump will neither be convicted of anything or resign.

It a great opportunity for you guys like Reck and djohn making these claims to make some easy money if you actually believe the you post.

Line up and put your money down es.

Be happy to pony up. "convicted" though is a hard stretch. Any legal fight will go for years. Not really a very feasible bet IMO.

[RandomGuy]

I was focusing more on Benghazi.

They can keep claiming Russian collusion for years but the facts will be out long before then. Top Dems are already starting to back away from the Russian collusion

heh. No, they didn't.

[Pavlov]

Now that we've established TSA in fact has a conspiracy theory, he can now explain it or clam up again.

[RandomGuy]

If Trump is impeached over this, I'll self-permaban

That will be interesting.

[TSA]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9390745

Is this not a conspiracy theory, TSA?

Explain.

It is not a conspiracy theory in the way you are trying to frame it (moon landing/9-11)

[spurraider21]

Now that we've established TSA in fact has a conspiracy theory, he can now explain it or clam up again.

he's going to wrestle over the semantics of what a conspiracy theory is, just like chris did in the novichok thread

[spurraider21]

damn he beat me to it by about 4 seconds

[Pavlov]

It is not a conspiracy theory in the way you are trying to frame it (moon landing/9-11)

It's a theory that involves, no, requires a conspiracy.

It's a conspiracy theory.

Perhaps you'd be less defensive about it if you explained how your theory actually works given the facts that are known.

Or you can just clam up.

[TSA]

It's a theory that involves, no, requires a conspiracy.

It's a conspiracy theory.

Perhaps you'd be less defensive about it if you explained how your theory actually works given the facts that are known.

Or you can just clam up.

I've already explained what I think happened and have told you I don't care to explain it to you over and over again day after day when you repeatedly ask me to. In a nuts it was a set up to frame Trump.

[Pavlov]

I've already explained what I think happened and have told you I don't care to explain it to you over and over again day after day when you repeatedly ask me to. In a nuts it was a set up to frame Trump.

So you're clamming up again.

Probably the best course of action since your conspiracy theory makes no sense at all.

It's ridiculous and I will ridicule you every time you try to pimp it.

You deserve it.

[spurraider21]

I've already explained what I think happened and have told you I don't care to explain it to you over and over again day after day when you repeatedly ask me to. In a nuts it was a set up to frame Trump.

so you would agree that your theory is that a covert but influential organization is responsible for these events?

or that these political events are the products of secret plots that are largely unknown to the general public?

[TSA]

So you're clamming up again.

Probably the best course of action since your conspiracy theory makes no sense at all.

It's ridiculous and I will ridicule you every time you try to pimp it.

You deserve it.

What is my conspiracy theory as you understand it?

[RandomGuy]

I'm trying to lose my here but you are being too much of a pussy and won't give out the information.

Who is implicated?
Who is being arrested?
What are they being charged with?

Remember when TSA's schtick was "no one is going to be charged with anything"?

[TSA]

so you would agree that your theory is that a covert but influential organization is responsible for these events?

or that these political events are the products of secret plots that are largely unknown to the general public?

Thank you Merriam-Webster.

[Pavlov]

What is my conspiracy theory as you understand it?

A 70 year old professor who worked for Nixon, Reagan and Bush is the secret superspy of Obama's conspiracy to frame Trump.

The conspiracy includes actually allowing Trump to be elected by not releasing all the information they got on him before the election.

Because reasons.

Feel free to amend this description, or clam up and let it stand as your conspiracy theory.

[TSA]

Remember when TSA's schtick was "no one is going to be charged with anything"?

Remember when Mueller finally got an indictment for Trump/Russia election collusion?

[Pavlov]

Remember when Mueller finally got an indictment for Trump/Russia election collusion?

Giuliani sure wrapped up the investigation in a couple weeks, didn't he?

[RandomGuy]

Everything is panning out as expected, not a single charge, indictment, or arrest. Even Flynn isn't in major trouble.

hehehehehehehehehehe

or:

[TSA]

A 70 year old professor who worked for Nixon, Reagan and Bush is the secret superspy of Obama's conspiracy to frame Trump.

The conspiracy includes actually allowing Trump to be elected by not releasing all the information they got on him before the election.

Because reasons.

Feel free to amend this description, or clam up and let it stand as your conspiracy theory.

It's a bit more complicated than that but I'll let it stand

[TSA]

hehehehehehehehehehe

or:

Is there a single charge, indictment, or arrest concerning Trump colluding with Russia during the election yes or no?

And Flynn still isn't in major trouble.

[Pavlov]

It's a bit more complicated than that

In what way?

Why does the conspiracy involve not releasing any information until well after the election?

[TSA]

In what way?

Why does the conspiracy involve not releasing any information until well after the election?

There was no verifiable damning information to release running up to the election. Clinton's campaign said they would not put out such information that could not be verified.

[Pavlov]

There was no verifiable damning information to release running up to the election. Clinton's campaign said they would not put out such information that could not be verified.

The people you accuse of child trafficking and ritual sexual abuse somehow clutched their pearls when it came to leaking a story about pros utes peeing on a bed?