Reply With Quote
Not if they knew the details of the draft. Sounds like a storm is coming.
and NYT published it
you would think a biased liberal globalist media source would bury the story
Not if they knew the details of the draft. Sounds like a storm is coming.
oh so they published a story about operation crossfire to help dems. got it.
what about uranium one?
Of course. That's called damage control.
Link me to the story so I can analyze it.what about uranium one?
you dont know that NYT was the first outlet to report on Uranium One?
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...m-company.html
Looks like Peter Schweizer chose them so he could sell more books. Were they supposed to tell him no?you dont know that NYT was the first outlet to report on Uranium One?
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...m-company.html
c'mon man
s gettin' REAL! Ver 2.6.1 Service Pack 7
You just got hosed Chris.
I agree that they lean left.
But they are also one of the best newspapers in the world.
You can’t separate this. You wanna be told what you wanna hear, it’s so painfully obvious. This same paper also did the majority of the work opening the Clinton foundation up and exposing B Sanders wife’s little bank problem.
Donnie just ed up again when they were trying to fixBoltons up
No way any deal is going to happen folks. Mark my words. If the meeting takes place it will be a royal show
The train to the summit seemed back on its track. Then Donald Trump derailed it again.
During a press conference yesterday he was asked about the "Libya model" issue (vid) and, in a seemingly off the cuff remark, managed to push the divisive comparison to a new level:
“The model, if you look at that model with Gaddafi, that was a total decimation. We went in there to beat him. Now that model would take place if we don’t make a deal, most likely. But if we make a deal, I think Kim Jong-un is going to be very, very happy.”
One might call that the 'art of the mafia deal': "Sign here or I will kill you."
Hater not understanding how other cultures work
Thinking Kim has any choice in the matter now
and damnation shtick has run its course
Huh? Not making sense hereHater not understanding how other cultures work
Thinking Kim has any choice in the matter now
and damnation shtick has run its course
Of course NK and Kim Kong have choice
American stupidity in full display thinking they have the upper hand
You thinking Kim still has a nuclear programHuh? Not making sense here
Of course NK and Kim Kong have choice
American stupidity in full display thinking they have the upper hand
NK bossing Trash like the less beta he is.
He really thinks he's gonna get a Nobel. Nobel people say "no ing way"
Is Trump adviser Bolton trying to undercut the president and kill the North Korea talks?
Finally, we have the astonishing remarks of John Bolton. A few days after the Kim-Moon meeting in the demilitarized zone, Trump’s national security adviser invoked “the Libya model” in describing how Washington wanted the North to denuclearize.
“One thing Libya did that led us to overcome our skepticism was that they allowed American and British observers into all their nuclear-related sites,” Bolton said.
“So it wasn’t a question of relying on international mechanisms. We saw them in ways we had never seen before.”
This man is a body part not customarily mentioned in family publications such as Salon.
Given that the North is entirely familiar with inspection procedures, and
given the gruesome fate of Moammar Gadhafi once he denuclearized Libya, it is perfectly clear to me that Bolton’s intent was to provoke the North into withdrawing from the Trump-Kim summit.
This is what I mean by subtle subterfuge. We will have to see, but
Bolton may have got what he sought, for the North reacted last week — to the joint military exercises, the rejection of reciprocity and the Bolton comments — just as one might reasonably expect.
“High-ranking officials of the White House and the Department of State including Bolton, White House national security adviser, are letting loose the assertions of a so-called Libya model of nuclear abandonment,” Pyongyang said Wednesday.
Kim Kye Gwan, the North’s vice-foreign minister, elaborated with this:
“If the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment, we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to the summit.”
the president assured Kim that if he deals with the U.S. “he’d be running his country.” Generous of our leader, I would say:
Assent to our demands and we will not kill you.
But then the clarifier:
Libya is merely an example of “what will take place if we don’t make a deal,” saith Trump.
Did Washington just make North Korea an offer it cannot possibly accept? I see little room for an alternative interpretation of the week’s events.
There is one key point still to be addressed.
How in the world will Kim surrender his nuclear programs, as he has suggested he will, given that his achievement of effective deterrence has proven essential to his opening earlier this year?
It is an excellent question — a flowing wellspring of skepticism in Washington.
Kim has Xi Jinping’s assurances that China’s nuclear deterrent is effectively at North Korea’s disposal.
“Surrender your nukes, young man,” the Chinese president seems to have said. “Ours will deter the Americans.”
If I am correct,
Xi has snookered the policy cliques in Washington on the denuclearization question.
Now we will have to see what other stunts the Trump administration’s hawkish wing may have in mind. This is not over until it is over.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/trump-adviser-bolton-trying-undercut-president-kill-north-korea-talks/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
You thinking Kim still has a nuclear program
From 3-D chess to incompetent fool...
No way any deal is going to happen folks. Mark my words. If the meeting takes place it will be a royal show
The train to the summit seemed back on its track. Then Donald Trump derailed it again.
During a press conference yesterday he was asked about the "Libya model" issue (vid) and, in a seemingly off the cuff remark, managed to push the divisive comparison to a new level:
“The model, if you look at that model with Gaddafi, that was a total decimation. We went in there to beat him. Now that model would take place if we don’t make a deal, most likely. But if we make a deal, I think Kim Jong-un is going to be very, very happy.”
One might call that the 'art of the mafia deal': "Sign here or I will kill you."
Everyday is a new crisis and a new evaluation.
Do you experience dizziness... ever?
hater doesn't think much of DJT but can't resist taunting grieving libs -- rhetorical cruelty is the master trope of victimized conservatives.
Called this sheet
No way any deal is going to happen folks. Mark my words. If the meeting takes place it will be a royal show
The train to the summit seemed back on its track. Then Donald Trump derailed it again.
Incompetent bufoons
Stay away from CNN. They are fake news.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
