So what's the big deal about this guy?
He keeps calling for society to do what it's already doing.
It sounds to me like he's advocating for women to lower their standards but not asking men to lower theirs.
Not really sure, though, his staunchest defenders in here don't seem to be able to summarize the philosophy in their own words so I could be off the mark.
Anyone (ie WH) who thinks this guy is calling for the outright subjugation of women is re ed.
That said, the notion that we need society to boost men’s egos is a pretty ing beta mentality.
He’s a self help guru at heart. If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him
I mean, isn’t it possible that the guy is espousing a particularly effete philosophy which is also a breeding ground for gross mischaracterizations and rampant idiocy on the SJWs part? Seems to me both are wrong here.
Well he often recognizes the value of what is happening or has happened. Some people want to dismantle without recognizing the value.
If you think he isn't, you're obtuse.
lol Gamergaters for gender equality now.
Boy oh boy that’s a lot of names and assumptions you’re throwing out there ...
So what's the big deal about this guy if he's saying people are already doing what he wants?
you were one of the biggest ones on this board at the time...
Not really, but regardless, your point is made. People can’t evolve opinions over time.
sure they can. have you changed your mind about being such a big proponent of gamergate?
That's not the entirety of what he says.
Never was one. Why are you so stuck on gamer gate? Don’t you have the big bad university professor to attack?
Whataboutism making a strong showing itt
who?
*whatabboutism mixed with incorrect recollections. That alcoholic haze must be something
What does he say? (In your words)
I meant, what university professor?
Now who’s being obtuse?
What does he say then?
What is he calling for?
Yes, please.
oh, Peterson. sorry about the confusion, he's better known as a counselor and motivational speaker for downtrodden beta males and aggrieved white conservatives.
I agree more than I disagree with that characterization fwiw
He says many things. You seem to be mixing everything with the lobster topic.
I have no idea what the lobster topic is.
I've asked repeatedly for you to elaborate on his enforced monogamy opinion. You seem unable to articulate it for yourself, which is surprising since you seem so determined to defend its validity.
Peterson is defending an anodyne status quo according to Nathan.
Enforced monogamy = pretty much what we have right now
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote