Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Chris]

Brennan, Clapper, Comey = ed

[DarrinS]

Huh? What do you mean by "do it" then?

Not the J. Edgar Hoover way.

[Reck]

From “meh, I don’t care” to caring a whole ing lot nice change of schtick, this one feels honest tbh

Well, having a thousand + posts on a thread he didn't care about wasn't holding much water so why not just say it lets go full trumpie.

[DarrinS]

Well, having a thousand + posts on a thread he didn't care about wasn't holding much water so why not just say it lets go full trumpie.

(ding) post count

[DarrinS]

Lot of civil libertarians quiet

because Trump

[Chris]

Ohr !

[Spurminator]

Not the J. Edgar Hoover way.

You're still not making any sense. If there's no right way to spy on a campaign for an advantage, then it doesn't matter whether it was the J. Edgar Hoover way or not.

[DarrinS]

You're still not making any sense. If there's no right way to spy on a campaign for an advantage, then it doesn't matter whether it was the J. Edgar Hoover way or not.

There’s no right way to spy on a campaign. Full stop

[Pavlov]

Lot of civil libertarians quiet

because Trump

What?

Explain what civil liberties were violated, Darrin.

[Spurminator]

There’s no right way to spy on a campaign. Full stop

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

[djohn2oo8]

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

Darrin

[DarrinS]

Then I'll re-ask this question: If the FBI suspects a foreign adversary is attempting to influence a Presidential election with the assistance of one of the campaigns, do you want them to ignore it?

with the assistance of one of the campaigns?

You are reaching.

[djohn2oo8]

with the assistance of one of the campaigns?

You are reaching.

Answer the question Darrin.

[DarrinS]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

[Chris]

Why wouldn't the FBI know about the media at that point?

What's the conspiracy theory now?

CNN = deep state confirmed

[DarrinS]

Answer the question Darrin.

They did get assistance from one campaign — Hillary’s (ding)

[Chris]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

No Kyle Griffin tonight.

[DarrinS]

djohn desperately searching for Kyle Griffin tweets

[Pavlov]

CNN = deep state confirmed

no

[Spurminator]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

It must be blissful to have such a skill at deflecting direct questions with snark and not feeling completely insecure.

We're talking about su ion. The FBI suspected there might be interference. Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Wikileaks contacts, DTJ's secret meeting... I mean if you honestly don't think there's enough smoke to justify SU ION of assistance, then you've clearly picked your side.

I'm in no big rush to see an investigation concluded prematurely. I know history, and I know these things take time.

[Pavlov]

It must be infuriating waiting for Drumpf to get taken down while all this new information keeps coming out.

Now we know what conspiracy theory you're waiting for.

[DarrinS]

It must be blissful to have such a skill at deflecting direct questions with snark and not feeling completely insecure.

I answered your question. There is no right way to spy on your opponent’s campaign. Spy on the Russians all you want.

[DarrinS]

Now we know what conspiracy theory you're waiting for.

“conspiracy theory”

Wash, rinse, repeat.

[Spurminator]

I answered your question. There is no right way to spy on your opponent’s campaign. Spy on the Russians all you want.

In doing so you likely gather intel on the campaign as well. That's how these things work. Now you're back to a procedural concern and away from your theory that this was about strategic intel. I can see why you favor snark.

[DarrinS]

In doing so you likely gather intel on the campaign as well. That's how these things work. Now you're back to a procedural concern and away from your theory that this was about strategic intel. I can see why you favor snark.

The queries and the unmasking. Let the IG do his work.