Page 8 of 36 FirstFirst ... 45678910111218 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 898
  1. #176
    Veteran Chillen's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,391
    The Warriors would steamroll both of those teams, and that's not even an insult. The Warriors are just too OP.
    I'd like to see how the Warriors would fare without a top 3 league player joining them. Spurs did not have Kobe, Dirk or LeBron hop on board in 2005 which is what has happened with Warriors (Durant). That being said that 2005 Spurs team I could see push Warriors with KD to 7 games, not sure who would win but they would make those Warriorettes earn it.

  2. #177
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    908
    The Warriors would steamroll both of those teams, and that's not even an insult. The Warriors are just too OP.
    ’99 team- today’s rules? Yes. Old rules? Mmmmmm, me thinks Ellie would make half the team cry. Duncan on green and S. ****** on Durant with David playing clean up... Avery would be exposed either set of rules though

    ’05 team destroys GSW. Who in the world guards Duncan? Bowen makes Durant beg to go back to OKC and Manu picks them apart. Curry has to defend prime Parker

  3. #178
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    If both Danny and Rudy opt out, SA is in a much better/easier spot to clear a “Lebron Max” then HOU is. If those two opt out, SA is in control and would really only need to trade Pau/Mills since they could erase the cap holds for all other free agents.
    Right. And reports have already come out saying both Danny and Rudy would do just that. Do you think we can find viable trading partners willing to take on Pau / Mills' contracts?

  4. #179
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Right. And reports have already come out saying both Danny and Rudy would do just that. Do you think we can find viable trading partners willing to take on Pau / Mills' contracts?
    I think Mills would not be an issue; Pau could be done but it would likely require giving up the 18th pick in order to do so. Nothing is impossible and if Lebron truly wants to come to SA they will make it happen even if it cost a lot to dump those deals.

  5. #180
    Go Lakers/Giants/Yankees David Stern's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    311
    I think Mills would not be an issue; Pau could be done but it would likely require giving up the 18th pick in order to do so. Nothing is impossible and if Lebron truly wants to come to SA they will make it happen even if it cost a lot to dump those deals.
    Where does Lebron play with Kawhi? PF? What about Aldridge? How about Milutinov’s role? The other issue is we’ll have 2 aging sidekicks next to Kawhi. How much longer can we expect a high level from Lebron? He’ll be 34 next year.

  6. #181
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Where does Lebron play with Kawhi? PF? What about Aldridge? How about Milutinov’s role? The other issue is we’ll have 2 aging sidekicks next to Kawhi. How much longer can we expect a high level from Lebron? He’ll be 34 next year.
    Kawhi can play SG

  7. #182
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Kawhi can play SG
    Our big lineup with lebron at SF and Kawhi at SG would dominate the league

  8. #183
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Our big lineup with lebron at SF and Kawhi at SG would dominate the league
    not with both injured

  9. #184
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Where does Lebron play with Kawhi? PF? What about Aldridge? How about Milutinov’s role? The other issue is we’ll have 2 aging sidekicks next to Kawhi. How much longer can we expect a high level from Lebron? He’ll be 34 next year.
    None of that is a major concern as SA with Kawhi is trying to win now. LMA would play center, Bron PF, Kawhi SF but that’s just designated position.

    Also Lebron will probably do what he always does and sign short term deal with options so long term is not a big issue. Not enough to pass on this at least.

  10. #185
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    After such a tough year it would be poetic justice to see something incredible happen for the Spurs. Seeing LeBron play next to Kawhi would be just the thing. Maybe a few folks will sicken on watching GSW cakewalk to another 'ship and decide to take them down.

    The NBA needs something to give after Durant's move. Yesterday I read a really lame article on how unselfish Durant is for joining GSW. It was something his publicist must have cooked up because I'm fairly certain that that writer is the only asshole who sees it that way. Nary a mention that he joined a 73 win team for the easiest path to winning a ring.

  11. #186
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    The Warriors would steamroll both of those teams, and that's not even an insult. The Warriors are just too OP.
    Yeah, I hate to say it, but these Warriors are better than any team that the Spurs faced during their runs.

    I'd love to see the imaginary matchup...but Dubs probably win as currently constructed.

  12. #187
    R.C. Deez Nuts. Mugen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    23,765
    Len Bias has a better chance of playing on the Spurs next year than LeBron tbh.

  13. #188
    Go Lakers/Giants/Yankees David Stern's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    311
    Yeah, I hate to say it, but these Warriors are better than any team that the Spurs faced during their runs.

    I'd love to see the imaginary matchup...but Dubs probably win as currently constructed.
    I just don’t see it. Those Spurs teams had mental toughness. They played in a few game 7’s. Played in several pressure situations. The Warriors have relied on other teams misfortunes (injuries), blowouts, and have shown the ability to crumble under real adversity (2016 vs Cavs, last year vs Spurs until Zaza injured Kawhi). They would punch the Warriors in the mouth repeatedly and the Warriors would get flustered. Duncan would destroy that frontcourt badly. Curry would be a non-factor with Bowen on him. Draymond would get abused by Duncan and I could see Horry getting in his head. The Warriors are a fantastic team, but punch them in the mouth and have a team like what those Spurs teams had, and they’d get exposed.

  14. #189
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    I think Mills would not be an issue; Pau could be done but it would likely require giving up the 18th pick in order to do so. Nothing is impossible and if Lebron truly wants to come to SA they will make it happen even if it cost a lot to dump those deals.
    But what about the timing, though? Isn't the draft before free agency? We would have to know beforehand that LeBron would be willing to come to San Antonio before dumping Pau along with that pick, which of course, is impossible.

    More to the point, ESPN's analysis says we would only need to dump Pau (not Mills) assuming Green and Gay opt out and we say goodbye to Parker.


  15. #190
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    But what about the timing, though? Isn't the draft before free agency? We would have to know beforehand that LeBron would be willing to come to San Antonio before dumping Pau along with that pick, which of course, is impossible.

    More to the point, ESPN's analysis says we would only need to dump Pau (not Mills) assuming Green and Gay opt out and we say goodbye to Parker.

    I haven’t done the exact math but I am operating under 2 assumptions: Lebron wants the full max he can get and won’t take a penny less & will have a good pulse on Lebron heading into free agency.

    I don’t think if SA gets rid of all their free agents and Danny/Rudy opt out that trading Pau gets them to Lebron’s max. It may be very close and it may not take trading Mills to get there, but there wouldn’t be many other choices and I doubt SA would want to trade younger players.

    But even if SA doesn’t know by the time the draft rolls around about Lebron, they can trade future picks which would be more than enough. Trust me, if/when Lebron says “yes” SA will have no trouble off loading Pau and Mills if needed IMO.

    Also, depending on Kawhi and what SA wants to do SA may very well look to dump Pau regardless so they have max cap space to rebuild around Kawhi or without him.

    It’s definitely more likely that they don’t do anything like that before they get commitments but I can see them doing that regardless so they have a lot of cap space heading into free agency.

  16. #191
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    So I did the math (using the capulator):

    If Danny & Rudy opt out and are renounced
    If all free agents are renounced (Tony Parker, Kyle Anderson, Bryn Forbes, Davis Bertans, Hilliard, Costello)
    If BP3 is waived (non-guaranteed deal)
    If SA defers Milutinov to the following year
    If SA trades Pau + 2019 first to a team like ATL for nothing back salary wise

    SA will have Kawhi, LMA, Mills, Manu, Joff, White & Murray under contract and will be at 69M in salaries including the charge for the 18th pick this year and cap holds for roster spots.

    The salary cap is 101M, so 101M - 69M = 32M in cap space.

    Lebron’s max is like 35.5M so SA would be about 3.5M short.

    So what ESPN said was not meant to be fully accurate; it was just a high level example of the type of moves SA would have to make.

    So Lebron could take less so SA doesn’t have to move other assets.
    SA could trade the 2018 pick in the Pau deal vs 2019 and get another 2M in cap space and get close to max.


    But if Lebron wants every penny, then SA would have to either trade the 2018 pick in the Pau deal instead of 2019 and then move either Mills, Murray, White or Joff (or if Joff unexpectedly declines his player option, just doing everything above but trading 2018 first instead of 2019 would get SA to full max).

    The biggest “hinge” is Danny & Rudy. If they opt out, the path becomes far easier. If they dont then it’s much tougher.

  17. #192
    Starter off the bench Uriel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    9,483
    So I did the math (using the capulator):

    If Danny & Rudy opt out and are renounced
    If all free agents are renounced (Tony Parker, Kyle Anderson, Bryn Forbes, Davis Bertans, Hilliard, Costello)
    If BP3 is waived (non-guaranteed deal)
    If SA defers Milutinov to the following year
    If SA trades Pau + 2019 first to a team like ATL for nothing back salary wise

    SA will have Kawhi, LMA, Mills, Manu, Joff, White & Murray under contract and will be at 69M in salaries including the charge for the 18th pick this year and cap holds for roster spots.

    The salary cap is 101M, so 101M - 69M = 32M in cap space.

    Lebron’s max is like 35.5M so SA would be about 3.5M short.

    So what ESPN said was not meant to be fully accurate; it was just a high level example of the type of moves SA would have to make.

    So Lebron could take less so SA doesn’t have to move other assets.
    SA could trade the 2018 pick in the Pau deal vs 2019 and get another 2M in cap space and get close to max.


    But if Lebron wants every penny, then SA would have to either trade the 2018 pick in the Pau deal instead of 2019 and then move either Mills, Murray, White or Joff (or if Joff unexpectedly declines his player option, just doing everything above but trading 2018 first instead of 2019 would get SA to full max).

    The biggest “hinge” is Danny & Rudy. If they opt out, the path becomes far easier. If they dont then it’s much tougher.
    Thanks a lot for running the math! This is really helpful.

    All reports suggest Gay and Green will opt out, so I don't think that will be an issue.

    ESPN is also reporting that the Spurs will extend qualifying offers to Anderson, Forbes, and Bertans. Does that mean their cap holds will eat into our cap space? But even then, we can renounce them later if LeBron says yes, right? And if we do, would we be able to sign them again after?

    I doubt the Spurs trade the 2018 pick, since they won't give up such a high pick for nothing if they don't have assurances from LeBron. I think it's more likely that they attach the 2019 pick to dump Pau's contract.

    So to get to the full max, given the scenario you outlined, we would indeed have to move Mills since I doubt we'll be willing to part with our younger players. On the bright side, that should give us enough room to offer LeBron the full max and use the space left over to bring in Milutinov and other free agents. Then fill out the rest of the roster with minimum players.

    So our roster could be like this:

    PG: Murray, White, Forbes
    SG: Leonard, Ginobili, FA filler
    SF: James, 18th pick / FA filler, FA filler
    PF: Aldridge, Lauvergne, FA filler
    C: Milutinov, 18th pick / FA filler, FA filler

  18. #193
    Go Lakers/Giants/Yankees David Stern's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    311
    Yeah, I hate to say it, but these Warriors are better than any team that the Spurs faced during their runs.

    I'd love to see the imaginary matchup...but Dubs probably win as currently constructed.

  19. #194
    Go Lakers/Giants/Yankees David Stern's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    311
    Yeah, I hate to say it, but these Warriors are better than any team that the Spurs faced during their runs.

    I'd love to see the imaginary matchup...but Dubs probably win as currently constructed.
    What a horrible written comment fron such a knowledgable Spurs fan. Oh look...another high pressure situation and the Warriors the bed. This team SUCKS at handling REAL adversity. Luckily Houston didn’t outchoke them, but go kill yourself for putting this team above those spurs teams, got.

  20. #195
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,665
    All reports suggest Gay and Green will opt out, so I don't think that will be an issue.
    What reports? I haven't seen anything about either of them...

  21. #196
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    What makes the most sense for Lebron is to tell Ainge that if he trades Irving the away for Kawhi, he signs with them.

    Lebron, Kawhi, Brown, Tatum, Horford, Stevens.

    Rozier, Smart, Hayward, Morris, Baynes off the bench.

  22. #197
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    What makes the most sense for Lebron is to tell Ainge that if he trades Irving the away for Kawhi, he signs with them.

    Lebron, Kawhi, Brown, Tatum, Horford, Stevens.

    Rozier, Smart, Hayward, Morris, Baynes off the bench.
    Not possible. Trading Kawhi for Kyrie is possible, but they don’t have any cap space to sign Lebron. The only way that Lebron and Kawhi end up in BOS is if Danny trades for both.

  23. #198
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    47,238
    Not possible. Trading Kawhi for Kyrie is possible, but they don’t have any cap space to sign Lebron. The only way that Lebron and Kawhi end up in BOS is if Danny trades for both.
    Lebron for Hayward. Done.

  24. #199
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Thanks a lot for running the math! This is really helpful.

    All reports suggest Gay and Green will opt out, so I don't think that will be an issue.

    ESPN is also reporting that the Spurs will extend qualifying offers to Anderson, Forbes, and Bertans. Does that mean their cap holds will eat into our cap space? But even then, we can renounce them later if LeBron says yes, right? And if we do, would we be able to sign them again after?
    That is correct. Most teams extend the QO, but that can be taken away as soon as SA needed to. But the cap holds do eat into the cap space until they formally withdraw the QO and then renounce them. That doesn’t stop SA from re-signing them but they would only have their cap space and any exceptions to do so which limits them after signing Bron.

    I doubt the Spurs trade the 2018 pick, since they won't give up such a high pick for nothing if they don't have assurances from LeBron. I think it's more likely that they attach the 2019 pick to dump Pau's contract.
    Totally possible and I agree; that’s why I used the 2019 1st rounder as the pick traded. But I can see SA wanting to trade Pau regardless to change things up. But also reasons why keeping him and not dumping your 18th pick makes sense in scenarios depending on how things with Kawhi shape up.

    So to get to the full max, given the scenario you outlined, we would indeed have to move Mills since I doubt we'll be willing to part with our younger players. On the bright side, that should give us enough room to offer LeBron the full max and use the space left over to bring in Milutinov and other free agents. Then fill out the rest of the roster with minimum players.

    So our roster could be like this:

    PG: Murray, White, Forbes
    SG: Leonard, Ginobili, FA filler
    SF: James, 18th pick / FA filler, FA filler
    PF: Aldridge, Lauvergne, FA filler
    C: Milutinov, 18th pick / FA filler, FA filler
    Trading Mills makes it so you can keep the young guys and have some cap space left over (like 7M) to sign more players. Definitely the “best” path, but also not necessarily mandatory if you want max cap space in these scenarios

  25. #200
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Lebron for Hayward. Done.
    For sure, was just saying they can’t have that team you outlined because they have to trade for Kawhi and Bron.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •