Reply With Quote
The evidence we have from nutritional studies are that hungry kids don't learn as well. Personally I don't think kids should be punished to make you feel superior to their parents.
You have a lot of grievances.
The evidence we have from nutritional studies are that hungry kids don't learn as well. Personally I don't think kids should be punished to make you feel superior to their parents.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 05-23-2018 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Dialing it back a notch.
we are talking about summer time when school is out !
do you think abortion is ok?
Ah, then letting them starve THEN is acceptable. Understood.
OK? I would prefer no abortions happen.
That will not be feasible, so I prefer them legal and accessible.
I think you believe in socialism
That would mean rich people would have to make due with slightly fewer $10,000 pairs of shoes.
Depends on how you define it, which you are almost certainly incapable of doing.
I prefer no people kill anyone with anything either but that is not feasible
so stoping people from killing people with guns is not feasible why not use that same logic and make them legal and accessible
how would you defend it I know how I would
if kids are starving the state would take the kids away
but again you think the gov should bail people out because they make bad choices
it is sad kids have to suffer from their parents choices but that is life
LeBron james kids are lucky they are born in a very wealthy family
james can afford to not have kids go to public school and things but do you think all kids should get to go to other schools then public schools
and who pays for it
refried beans are cheap and filling
Turns out the free meals program is federally funded.
Depends on how you define [socialism], which you are almost certainly incapable of doing.
Sigh.
I said DEFINE it. (assume you merely mis-read my post).
Feel free to define "socialism", and I will tell you if I am for it or not. I have no idea what concept you have floating around in your head.
re-read that. (sighs)
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective or cooperative ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] though social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.[5][14][15]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
That definition is, by definition, not a definition.
the Fed paints a picture of overall improvement:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/publi...lds-201805.pdfAltogether, the survey findings provide a snapshot of people’s financial lives in late 2017. It is a story of overall improvement consistent with the national economic expansion. It is also a complex story of variation among different groups in the country and remaining areas of economic vulnerability…. Four in 10 adults, if faced with an unexpected expense of $400, would either not be able to cover it or would cover it by selling something or borrowing money. This is an improvement from half of adults in 2013 being ill-prepared for such an expense. Over one-fifth of adults are not able to pay all of their current month’s bills in full. Over one-fourth of adults skipped necessary medical care in 2017 due to being unable to afford the cost.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions