Reply With Quote
It's going quite well.
Agent at Flynn interview wants to testify against Mueller & Co.
It's going quite well.
Where's the actual government report, Chris?
This guy isn't even in the government.
Sorry, question pending.
How many message boards do you post anonymously on, Pavlov?
One.
But you post tweets from anonymous authors all the time.
How does "prepared to be subpoenaed" = "willing to provide testimony" TSA?
How does "posting tweets from anonymous authors" = "worshiping anonymous twitter accounts" Pavlov?
Explain.
Then this will devolve into a tug of war. For your 20 former FBI agent, there are that and perhaps even more that were bothered how the Hillary Investigation was botched to favor Trump in one way or another.
No one wins. Well I guess Hillary does because she ain't going to jail regardless.
#AlwaysWithHer
Sorry, question pending:
How does "prepared to be subpoenaed" = "willing to provide testimony" TSA?
The question TSA is currently dodging shows Carter isn't saying what he wants her to say.
Sara Carter wrote the article ask her.
How does "posting tweets from anonymous authors" = "worshiping anonymous twitter accounts" Pavlov?
Explain.
yes I'm sure they are bothered about that and not bothered by the fact that they worked their asses off on the case and found actual criminal wrong doing by Hillary only to have their boss ignore their findings and shut down the investigation.
She's not saying what you want her to say.
lol
It's hyperbole.How does "posting tweets from anonymous authors" = "worshiping anonymous twitter accounts" Pavlov?
Explain.
I can put it in less triggering terms since you seem to have a big problem with it:
How many anonymous authors of tweets, blogs and articles do you cite here?
raising money for a guy who already pled guilty
That's absolutely false.
You're talking as if evidence was hidden from the prosecutors and the people who actually investigated this thing. Also, said evidence doesn't just dissapear. The people in charge now have that same fact based evidence that they can look at and determine the same thing.
Jeff Sessions: No second special counsel needed.
It's laughable that you think Comey had exclusive rights to whatever he found out and only he does.
All part of the narrative backflips TSA has to do on a daily basis.That's absolutely false.
You're talking as if evidence was hidden from the prosecutors and the people who actually investigated this thing. Also, said evidence doesn't just dissapear. The people in charge now have that same fact based evidence that they can look at and determine the same thing.
Jeff Sessions: No second special counsel needed.
It's laughable that you think Comey had exclusive rights to whatever he found out and only he does.
There's a big reason he refuses to actually state his "fluid" conspiracy theory.
Oh what do you think it is that I am wanting her to say?
I don't keep track, maybe 3 or 4? What does being anonymous have to do with anything?
That the FBI agents are lining up to support whatever your conspiracy theory is today.
I believe they choose to be anonymous because they know they are full of . Since they tend to publish the most far out bull that often turns out to be completely wrong, that tends to support my thinking.I don't keep track, maybe 3 or 4? What does being anonymous have to do with anything?
If you depend on people who are too afraid to even say who they are, you are free to do so.
What I said was absolutely true. The rank and file FBI found criminal wrong doing by Clinton and Comey ignored it and shut them down by saying Clinton didn't intend to break the law. Intent was never needed to prove she broke laws.That's absolutely false.
You're talking as if evidence was hidden from the prosecutors and the people who actually investigated this thing. Also, said evidence doesn't just dissapear. The people in charge now have that same fact based evidence that they can look at and determine the same thing.
Jeff Sessions: No second special counsel needed.
It's laughable that you think Comey had exclusive rights to whatever he found out and only he does.
As to your no second special counsel needed comment, what power do you think a special counsel has that Huber does not? Or did you forget Sessions' appointed Huber to work in parallel with the OIG?
They're lining up: hot and ready.
...or to protect themselves from vitriolic trolls like you. lolI believe they choose to be anonymous because they know they are full of .
Hyperbole and gibberish.Since they tend to publish the most far out bull that often turns out to be completely wrong, that tends to support my thinking.
lol you support ANTIFA (masked cowards)If you depend on people who are too afraid to even say who they are, you are free to do so.
Why do you choose to be anonymous?
So they already have enough to put away Clinton and got Special-not-Special Counsel Huber all ready to go.
Why hasn't Clinton been indicted?
Explain.
Last edited by Pavlov; 05-25-2018 at 04:26 PM.
Because I want to pretend to be an authority on government conspiracies that you will repeat and accept and trust without question of course.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions