Reply With Quote
I've been actually very kind with my time here, tried to be gentle. Now turns out because I don't buy some conspiracy kookoo (after asking multiple times for actual evidence), I'm a partisan hack.
Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions.
that's really telling me... Mr vapid to the rescue.
I've been actually very kind with my time here, tried to be gentle. Now turns out because I don't buy some conspiracy kookoo (after asking multiple times for actual evidence), I'm a partisan hack.
Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions.
Dude looks like a ing squirrel, always in the action scene telling us what happened...
Also look at that stoned fat , with his en lement the guy said him ¨Im not your parents¨ and the slob tells him to off, in most places you get your ass kicked talking like that to authorities.
Do we want a world full of these talentless hacks?
¨Happened¨ Hogg is full of .
Vagueness followed by blather. I guess you know you've lost, chump style.
He never said what you said he did, we already went over that.
Dunno what this Hogg kid did, but it cut deep, tbh... don't page me until you bring up some actual evidence, not some 'connect the dots' kookoo .
We already have Cosmore for that, tbh
I've been actually very kind with my time here, tried to be gentle. Now turns out because I don't buy some conspiracy kookoo (after asking multiple times for actual evidence), I'm a partisan hack.
Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions.
Dude looks like a ing squirrel, always in the action scene telling us what happened...
Also look at that stoned fat , with his en lement the guy said him ¨Im not your parents¨ and the slob tells him to off, in most places you get your ass kicked talking like that to authorities.
Do we want a world full of these talentless hacks?
Oh, we're ever so honored that the great Nono would descend to us. It must be bitter for you to take all that time for an L.
Ooooooh, that's what this is about, internet victory, you should've started there, and I would've saved some time.
Sure! you win :thumbsup
Yeah, people that read this thread are totally convinced. You really showed them...
I'm left questioning the education system in America, but that's material for another thread.
Last edited by ElNono; 05-29-2018 at 01:50 AM. Reason: typo
I'm totally partisan too, BTW... my 110.000+ posts show I'm totally sold for the deep state. Like totally, I never would think for myself. I'm like Chris and boutons on steroids. Sounds legit...
Don't care if you call it an L or not. You checked out though. And I call it partisan cos you clearly lean one way to not accept simple truth. I've showed you in no uncertain terms that Hogg weaved two different stories. It's black and white. It's not even disputable, bro. He knew about the shooting at school and then somehow didn't later when he's watching the news, according to himself (primary source too: Pavlov, idiot).
My biggest takeaway from this thread is how the people that the most about media bias have a textbook cases of confirmation bias.
Look at this case where the source would otherwise be considered 'biased and unreliable', but suddenly and selectively becomes the exact opposite just because it pretends to corroborate some personal bias.
Seen it a million times here with guys like Cobra, Yoni, boutons, etc. If you even wonder how the likes of O'Keefe or Michael Moore have an audience, look no further.
you're just a blue-pill sheepMy biggest takeaway from this thread is how the people that the most about media bias have a textbook cases of confirmation bias.
Look at this case where the source would otherwise be considered 'biased and unreliable', but suddenly and selectively becomes the exact opposite just because it pretends to corroborate some personal bias.
Seen it a million times here with guys like Cobra, Yoni, boutons, etc. If you even wonder how the likes of O'Keefe or Michael Moore have an audience, look no further.
My biggest take is that you don't accept truth unless it's state sanctioned. Every time, you've ran from the fact that David Hogg showcased he was under attack and hiding in a room and then later said he found out about the attack on the news. You have dodged that conflicting story, time and time again. Apparently if the NYT doesn't do a story saying this is the case then it just can't be what happened. Also, you've became quite passive aggressive rather than deal with the established fact that Hogg has obviously lied.My biggest takeaway from this thread is how the people that the most about media bias have a textbook cases of confirmation bias.
Look at this case where the source would otherwise be considered 'biased and unreliable', but suddenly and selectively becomes the exact opposite just because it pretends to corroborate some personal bias.
Seen it a million times here with guys like Cobra, Yoni, boutons, etc. If you even wonder how the likes of O'Keefe or Michael Moore have an audience, look no further.
Hogg never said he found out about the shooting from the news.
You made that up.
Coping mechanism.
He was at home when he found out about the shooting on the news and he got on his bike and peddled the three miles as fast as he could to the school, he said. His own words, bruh.
No, those were not his own words. You never quote him because you simply make up.
big deal. its perfectly ok to lie now.
It's not a primary source if you just make up words.
He tells the story of person just having learned of the shooting and frantically reacting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions