Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[spurraider21]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?

[spurraider21]

So which event do you think started it tbh? There are three stories that have been pushed. They all can’t be true.

what is the article you are referring to that says the dossier started the investigation?

[TSA]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?

Comey testified to it starting in July.

[Pavlov]

the bbc article says it started sometime around what, april 2016? the nyt article references the same investigation and says the FBI is leading the investigation. the mcclatchy article references the same investigation and says it started in spring of 2016

is that a good enough "general date" for you?

I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

[Pavlov]

Comey testified to it starting in July.

Which would be after the time given for the task force in the articles.

Pretty simple.

[TSA]

I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

I’m simply pointing out the changing narratives the media has pushed and trying to figure out which one you believe to be true.

[spurraider21]

Comey testified to it starting in July.

which is stated in the drunk papadopolous article, too

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?

im still waiting on the article that claims the dossier started the investigation, btw

[TSA]

I think he wants to bog everything down in semantics.

I don't understand why he demands to know every last detail of an ongoing FBI investigation, especially after begin completely ignorant of the task force story for 18 months.

Yes the difference between April and July is just semantics lol

[Pavlov]

I’m simply pointing out the changing narratives the media has pushed and trying to figure out which one you believe to be true.

Not really. It's a pretty steady progression. You didn't read the articles so you don't even know what you're trying to talk about.

[Pavlov]

Yes the difference between April and July is just semantics lol

you really haven't read any of the articles.

[Pavlov]

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?

This is precisely what he is trying to say after carefully not reading any of the articles he didn't know about for 18 months.

[spurraider21]

This is precisely what he is trying to say after carefully not reading any of the articles he didn't know about for 18 months.

i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh

[TSA]

which is stated in the drunk papadopolous article, too

are you saying the FBI investigation that started in july is the same as the counterintelligence task force that was assembled during the spring?

im still waiting on the article that claims the dossier started the investigation, btw

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.

[Pavlov]

i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh

you have a better memory than I. That would be completely insane if it was TSA.

[spurraider21]

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.

correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people who tried to push the "dossier is what launched the investigation" stuff was pro-trump conspiri s.

if i'm wrong, at least when it comes to people in this forum, please direct me to posts where people have made that claim.

[TSA]

i'm pretty sure i remember having this same discussion months ago, tbh

I don’t tbh

Tell me more about these two separate investigations into the Trump campaign and who the targets were.

[Pavlov]

I don’t tbh

Tell me more about these two separate investigations into the Trump campaign and who the targets were.

[spurraider21]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9280347

[Pavlov]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9280347

Well, we now know TSA will not read any articles spoon fed to him.

Twice.

lol

[Reck]

I'll be laughing all the way to the voting booth in 2020. Democrat Party is FUBAR.

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

[TSA]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9280347

So there were no reported stories about this joint task force investigation until after the Steele dossier was released?

[TSA]

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

Don’t make spurraider21 pull up all your pre-election quotes

[Pavlov]

So there were no reported stories about this joint task force investigation until after the Steele dossier was released?

Not that I have seen.

What is your conspiracy theory about that, TSA?

[spurraider21]

I didn’t have a specific one in mind just the general dossier story that was pushed.

correct me if i'm wrong, but the only people who tried to push the "dossier is what launched the investigation" stuff was pro-trump conspiri s.

if i'm wrong, at least when it comes to people in this forum, please direct me to posts where people have made that claim.

[Chris]

And of course you're basing this off what exactly? Virginia? Pennsylvania? Alabama?

1.) Nuclear fallout exposed Liberals for being childish and sheepish.

2.) Chuck & Nancy. (no explanation needed)

3.) Kamala Harris. (only prominent "opponent" I have seen for Trump so far; Bernie Sanders may be running again but everyone knows he's a collectivist and the cat is out of the bag)

4.) The DNC went bankrupt. ()

5.) Trump has massive support and is winning over blue states simply by adhering to the Cons ution.

6.) Trump goes around Media with Twitter. (will continue to do so; has a unique connection to Americans)

7.) The scandal is not going to go away any time soon. This is going to have a ripple effect on the DNC for years and years...

8.) HRC won't go away. She's the gift that keeps on giving and a reminder to vote for Trump in 2020.

9.) lol rambling about random states (who knows what you're talking about?) ()