Samantha Bee

[Spurminator]

You saying you weren't offended / supporting Roseanne's cancellation?

Today's

As noted in the quote you found, I support ABC's right to cancel a show on their network for whatever reason they see fit. Has nothing to do with being offended. I have no emotional reaction to her comments. They are objectively racist, but that doesn't mean I'm personally offended by them. Just means she's probably going to have a hard time keeping a job by making those comments.

I bet you thought you'd find something a lot more incriminating, didn't you?

[Pavlov]

Roasted derp.

[Spurtacular]

As noted in the quote you found, I support ABC's right to cancel a show on their network for whatever reason they see fit. Has nothing to do with being offended. I have no emotional reaction to her comments. They are objectively racist, but that doesn't mean I'm personally offended by them. Just means she's probably going to have a hard time keeping a job by making those comments.

I bet you thought you'd find something a lot more incriminating, didn't you?

You argued that she doesn't have a right to keep her show. You weren't arguing ABC's right to cancel. Nice try at moving the goalposts, snowflake. And at ChumpDumper for thinking you had something there.

[Spurtacular]

Roasted derp.

#SoDesperateForaW

[Pavlov]

You argued that she doesn't have a right to keep her show. You weren't arguing ABC's right to cancel. Nice try at moving the goalposts, snowflake. And at ChumpDumper for thinking you had something there.

He totally argued ABC's right to cancel

lol roasted

[Spurtacular]

He totally argued ABC's right to cancel

lol roasted

I know your little brain doesn't want to compute; but a person not having a right to keep a show and a network having a right to cancel are finitely two different things.

[Spurminator]

You argued that she doesn't have a right to keep her show. You weren't arguing ABC's right to cancel. Nice try at moving the goalposts, snowflake.

They're the same thing. Roseanne Barr has no protected right to have her show not be cancelled by her employer.

You're embarrassing yourself again. What is it with you, are you a masochist or do you just not get any daily human interaction?

[Winehole23]

he can't possibly be that dense, but who knows?

maybe he just needs to lay off the laughing gas

[Spurtacular]

They're the same thing. Roseanne Barr has no protected right to have her show not be cancelled by her employer.

You're embarrassing yourself again. What is it with you, are you a masochist or do you just not get any daily human interaction?

Roseanne has the first amendment right to make remarks and keep her show (at the network's discretion). You were trying to make an issue out of conservatives arguing that when it's a simple fact. You should pick better things to cry over.

[Spurtacular]

Except that is exactly what Spurminator argued.

There is no 1st Amendment right to say racist stuff on-air or to keep one's show on a corporate-owned network.

What part of "keep their show on a corporate-owned network" don't you understand?

That you edited that out.
Today's dumb

[Pavlov]

Roseanne has the first amendment right to make remarks and keep her show (at the network's discretion). You were trying to make an issue out of conservatives arguing that when it's a simple fact. You should pick better things to cry over.

the network's discretion is exactly what he was talking about.

[Winehole23]

there's a reason I edited. it was a little clumsy.

there for sure is a 1st Amendment right to say racist stuff, but that doesn't mean ABC has to put it on their TV station, or that they can't fire people who say things that turn off their viewers.

[Spurtacular]

the network's discretion is exactly what he was talking about.

Nope. You'll get a W someday, tiger.

[Spurtacular]

They are objectively racist, but that doesn't mean I'm personally offended by them.

Before I forget, always the biggest gimps claiming objectivity.

[Spurtacular]

there's a reason I edited. it was a little clumsy.

there for sure is a 1st Amendment right to say racist stuff, but that doesn't mean ABC has to put it on their TV station, or that they can't fire people who say things that turn off their viewers.

Super awesome, sport! Too bad it's not really what conservatives are really arguing or anything.

[Winehole23]

what are so-called conservatives arguing?

[Vito Corleone]

I wanted to make a comment about all this, but then I remembered, I don't own a TV and really don't care what one rat calls another rat.

The beauty of streaming everything; you don't have to see crap like Rosanne or Samantha Bee.

[Spurminator]

Roseanne has the first amendment right to make remarks and keep her show (at the network's discretion). You were trying to make an issue out of conservatives arguing that when it's a simple fact. You should pick better things to cry over.

Who's crying? I posted a tweet that triggered you into a late night rampage where you've proceeded to affirm everything I said.

Get some friends, you'll have less need to invent arguments.

[Chucho]

How is it an issue with people who aren't complete twits? You are employed. You do what your employer asks or leave or get fired. No different than faux activists being told to take a knee. You can't do what you want on another's dime.

[Spurtacular]

Who's crying? I posted a tweet that triggered you into a late night rampage where you've proceeded to affirm everything I said.

Get some friends, you'll have less need to invent arguments.

Fact is nobody here was arguing that Roseanne has a right to keep her show. And that is not the scope of the national argument either.

[spurraider21]

Fact is nobody here was arguing that Roseanne has a right to keep her show. And that is not the scope of the national argument either.

Roseanne has the first amendment right to make remarks and keep her show (at the network's discretion). You were trying to make an issue out of conservatives arguing that when it's a simple fact. You should pick better things to cry over.

[Spurminator]

Fact is nobody here was arguing that Roseanne has a right to keep her show. And that is not the scope of the national argument either.

So when you quoted me trying to show that I was offended by Roseanne's comments, what you were actually doing was simply quoting me from another thread to say you disagreed with what I posted in that thread.

OK. You could have said that in the thread I originally posted it in if it bothered you so much.

[Spurtacular]

I was speaking of an absolute right. Nobody is making that case. Nobody.

[boutons_deux]

Racism Versus Accuracy

When she published her racist tweet about Valerie Jarrett,

Justice was swift for Roseanne, and she deserved it.

But when Samantha Bee

Called Ivanka a “feckless ****,”

There should be no fallout — what SHE said was accurate.

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2018/06/01/racism-versus-accuracy/

[spurraider21]

I was speaking of an absolute right. Nobody is making that case. Nobody.

you like to backtrack a lot of your comments.

i dont blame you, most of them are asinine to begin with.