Reply With Quote
Also, question pending:
But you won't use "spy".
Turns out he's just not that worried about it since he said the FBI acted properly.
He didn't say "pending review of the do ents that say exactly what Halper's role was."
He said the FBI acted properly knowing Halper was an informant.
And Nunes hasn't said that I've seen.
Just doesn't look good for your conspiracy theory that you definitely believe but can't actually explain to save your life.
Also, question pending:
Discovery typically happens after there's a pretty good idea of what occurred. You act like the absence of do ents means Gowdy is as clueless about everything as you are.If they mean the same to me I'll use whatever word I choose.
In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what do ents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).
http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/30/...ygate-reports/
who cares and why does it matter?
That changes nothing about what I said. Do ents typically provide evidence of events that have already been discussed. He doesn't need to know what the specific do ents are to have a good idea of the events they will describe.
But you won't use "spy".
Turns out he's just not that worried about it since he said the FBI acted properly.
He didn't say "pending review of the do ents that say exactly what Halper's role was."
He said the FBI acted properly knowing Halper was an informant.
And Nunes hasn't said that I've seen.
Just doesn't look good for your conspiracy theory that you definitely believe but can't actually explain to save your life.
I care. That's why I asked.
You depend heavily on anonymous sources for your conspiracy theories.
Why do you trust them so much?
So he wasn't an informant after all? Sjure looks like you thought that was his role.
Pick a lane, TSA.
What are you hoping will be in the do ents?
Don't say you aren't hoping anything. Your current conspiracy nontheory relies on them.
Why do you care?
The research and conclusions either stand on their own or fail.
I don't know what will be in the do ents but there must be a pretty good reason the DOJ has been stonewalling so much.
Great, I can get an anonymous source that says the research is a complete failure.
What would you do then?
Why do your conspiracy nontheories rely so heavily on anonymous blogs?
You didn't answer the question:
What are you hoping will be in the do ents?
Don't say you aren't hoping anything. Your current conspiracy nontheory relies on them.
They are not quite the same thing. Semantics aside, the guy didn't quite insert himself into the campaign. Trumps claims are blatant lies.
What do you think the Republicans are doing with those children they are removing from their parents, TSA? Just curious."We met a terrified six-year-old blind boy taken from his mother at the border. All he did was beg for his mother. if we cannot represent him, he will stand in front of a judge and represent himself, since there is no public defender system in immigration court, even for children. So will the 12 month old baby we met - stripped from her mother's inconsolable mother's arms. So will the 58 other children living in that childrens' detention center in the middle of Arizona right now, all under the age of 10, all afraid and desperate for their mothers and fathers"
--Lauren Dasse, Esq., Executive Director
Florence Immigrant and Refugee rights project.
Funny thing about TSA. Not even Nunes has been making a big deal out of not getting any do ents
RandomGuy with the "what about the children". Yikes.
I got one
That's a substantial improvement from taking food from the mouths of 294 million children on a
Chuck Woolery with the "what about the children." Yikes.
Formert Sheriff Clarke needs to get his black on again.
And accessorize with a cowboy hat that fits.
In concluding that this seems picayune, it is not my purpose to challenge the technical legal sufficiency of the charge. The requirement to prove a false statement was “material” (see Section 1001 of the federal penal code) is a very low hurdle.
the rest is hortatory: MOAR Congressional oversight of the Mueller investigation.
Nunes intending to impeach Rosenstein, so a replacement will shutdown Mueller, is heavy oversight
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions