Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[boutons_deux]

'A Shame and a Disgrace':

Former Prosecutor Slams Giuliani's Outrageous Claim that Mueller's Team Will 'Frame' Trump

"He knows better, and it's an outright lie."

He continued: "I think that what Rudy has done is a shame and a disgrace as a former U.S. attorney, and as a former justice official, he knows better, and it's an outright lie."

"You think

he's out of line beyond what is zealous advocacy for his client?" Melber asked.

"Yes, I think it's outrageous,"

Flannery said.

"I think it's absolutely outrageous that

he as an officer of the court would be putting down an entire system

based on the exercise of an individual's right to choose to elect one person or another separate and apart from your professional job."

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...claim-muellers

[TSA]

What is the DOJ/FBI hiding about Flynn’s plea?

“The Department’s reply to my May 11, 2018 letter seeking information about the cir stances surrounding Lt. General Michael Flynn’s reported conversations with the Russian ambassador and FBI records related to those conversations is insufficient. The letter only recounts a series of publicly known facts about Lt. General Flynn’s plea agreement and relies on improper excuses in refusing to provide the requested information. The Committee requires this information to fulfill its Cons utional function and its charge under Senate Rules to conduct oversight of the Department of Justice.

First, as you know, some of that information was first requested on a bipartisan basis before your confirmation. The Committee has waited patiently for much more than a year for the criminal inquiry related to Lt. General Flynn to conclude. It has been more than five months since his guilty plea. Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the cir stances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview.

Second, the Department’s letter erroneously suggests that complying with Congressional oversight would result in “the reality or the appearance of political interference” in a “pending criminal prosecution.” There is no pending prosecution. The guilty plea was more than five months ago.

The Department’s letter describes in detail what everyone already knows. Lt. General Flynn admitted to the Statement of Offense with the able assistance of counsel. All that remains is for Lt. General Flynn to be sentenced. Simply disclosing facts to the Committee could not possibly “interfere” with the case at this late date, assuming those facts are consistent with the representations that prosecutors arranged for Lt. General Flynn to swear to in federal court.

If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish”

More at link:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo...20Request).pdf

[Reck]

The OP of the “most successful thread” is going to lose $2000 in his own thread. Great success.

I'm not seeing the connection between this thread (About Flynn---and now about the Mueller investigation overall) and an outside bet you may have made with djohn. This thread was over when Flynn pleaded guilty and began cooperating with the aforementioned.

[TSA]

I'm not seeing the connection between this thread (About Flynn---and now about the Mueller investigation overall) and an outside bet you may have made with djohn. This thread was over when Flynn pleaded guilty and began cooperating with the aforementioned.

You can’t see the connection because you are more re ed than the OP.

[TSA]

Manafort witness tampering circle jerk getting a bucket of ice water

https://www.lawfareblog.com/manafort...ng-allegations

[DarrinS]

I'm not seeing the connection between this thread (About Flynn---and now about the Mueller investigation overall) and an outside bet you may have made with djohn. This thread was over when Flynn pleaded guilty and began cooperating with the aforementioned.

When this thread was created, Mueller investigation wasn’t a thing.

[DarrinS]

Truth be told, no one really gives a about Flynn, Manafort, or Papadopoulos.

Or Cohen

[Reck]

You can’t see the connection because you are more re ed than the OP.

But not quite as re ed as the guy who has pizzagate, pedogate, indictment gate, memogate stain on his record.

That's a win in my book.

[Reck]

When this thread was created, Mueller investigation wasn’t a thing.

The Mueller investigation is a carried over from the one Comey was spearheading. Mueller has since expanded it but Comey started it.

[Pavlov]

And I don’t care about it now. Why are you so focused on my prediction and don’t say a word about djohns? You just went as far as editing the quote so you wouldn’t have to talk about it. Why the double standard?

You get more butthurt about it tbh. This double standard whining proves that.

Also the things you were wrong about were more ridiculous.

[djohn2oo8]

Truth be told, no one really gives a about Flynn, Manafort, or Papadopoulos.

Or Cohen

Truth be told, no one gives a about your non takes. And of course you keep coming back to this thread for things you don't care about

[djohn2oo8]

Manafort witness tampering circle jerk getting a bucket of ice water

https://www.lawfareblog.com/manafort...ng-allegations

Oh is that from the judge? No? okay then.

Hey Darrin. Sure as looks like TSA cares

[djohn2oo8]

Too embarrassed to even discuss our bet. You’re pathetic.

Susan Rice laugh and laugh.

[TSA]

You get more butthurt about it tbh. This double standard whining proves that.

Also the things you were wrong about were more ridiculous.

You still won’t address djohns predictions lol.

Anything I’ve been wrong hasn’t cost me a dime. Explain how losing $2000 is somehow less ridiculous.

[TSA]

Susan Rice laugh and laugh.

The bet isn’t even settled and I’ve broken you

[djohn2oo8]

You still won’t address djohns predictions lol.

Anything I’ve been wrong hasn’t cost me a dime. Explain how losing $2000 is somehow less ridiculous.

My predictions haven't been disproven like yours. Sucka.

[djohn2oo8]

The bet isn’t even settled and I’ve broken you

Nope. Looks like they have broken Manafort though lol

[Pavlov]

You still won’t address djohns predictions lol.

Especially since you keep whining about it.

Go ahead and whine about it some more.

Anything I’ve been wrong hasn’t cost me a dime. Explain how losing $2000 is somehow less ridiculous.

No bet will win back what you lost when you went full re on #pizzagate.

[DarrinS]

The Mueller investigation is a carried over from the one Comey was spearheading. Mueller has since expanded it but Comey started it.

Appointed by the guy who recommended firing Comey. Smh

[djohn2oo8]

Hannity advising witnesses to destroy their phones. Sounds nervousssssss

[DarrinS]

Hannity advising witnesses to destroy their phones. Sounds nervousssssss

He told them to Hillary their phones?

[djohn2oo8]

Appointed by the guy who recommended firing Comey. Smh

Trump said on TV he was going to fire regardless. No wonder you don't post much. Jeez.

[Pavlov]

Appointed by the guy who recommended firing Comey. Smh

Darrin doesn't even know about the two memos.

[djohn2oo8]

He told them to Hillary their phones?

That is an unhealthy obsession you have. This thread bothers you and I like that.

[DarrinS]

Trump said on TV he was going to fire regardless. No wonder you don't post much. Jeez.

Rosenstein has more conflict than Sessions.