OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
A take!
Explain in your own words how Rosenstein has more of a conflict than Sessions.
Trump said on live tv he always planned to fire Comey. Regardless of recommendation. Keep up Darrin.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
A take!
Explain in your own words how Rosenstein has more of a conflict than Sessions.
Explain how he doesn’t?
And Darrin immediately tries a derp impression to escape explaining his one take.
lol
I'm impressed, you finally found a decent source who isn't a MAGA or InfoWars writer.
Since I assume you trust Paul Rosenzweig, I'm sure you'll appreciate him throwing a bucket of water on basically everything you've pretended to believe for the past two years.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/attacking-our-civic-faith
https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-ma...not-be-writtenWe have a President who tries every day to undermine the public’s confidence in the rule of law – who sows doubt about the integrity of the women and men of the Department of Justice and the FBI (women and men whose integrity and commitment to public service I saw up close every day for the better part of eight years when I was in the government), a President who demands that his political adversaries be thrown in prison, who attacks the integrity of judges when they rule against him.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/unpackin...e-hype-and-lawThe malignant deviancy of the Trump administration and Trumpist supporters in Congress continues apace. The decision of the House intelligence committee Republicans to close their investigation into Russian interference with the completely non-credible claim that they found no evidence of Russian interference is yet another sign of the moral and intellectual vacuuity of Trumpism. But it is also something more. It is, sadly, a sign that the liberal order of intelligence oversight is breaking down fatally.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/trading-...E2%80%A6-walesThe latest instance of "what-aboutism" is the House Republican decision to open an investigation of the Uranium One transaction—the allegation that Hillary Clinton transferred control of 20% of America's uranium mining output to a Russian company, in exchange for substantial contributions to the Clinton Foundation from the executives of that same Russian company. Perhaps fearing future revelations of Trump's closeness to Russia, the evident purpose of the investigation is to establish a "Hillary too" counterpoint. Based on what is currently in the public record, little, if anything about the allegation is plausible.
For another example, consider the president’s ongoing assault on the attorney general (and on law enforcement more generally). This is nothing less than an effort to undermine the rule of law and the independence of the legal process. To be sure, the application of law responds to political factors—that, after all, is why the attorney general is a politically appointed position. But the tradition of relative independence and reasonable efforts to avoid investigative interference are norms that exist for a reason. Assailing them is truly, as Jack Goldsmith has said, the act of a kamikaze president. Threatening to fire the attorney general for, in essence, doing exactly what was required in this instance is nothing less than an assault on law and an assertion of monarchical power.
Then there is the president’s obsession with his former opponent, Hillary Clinton. He castigates his attorney general for not considering the prosecution of his political opponent—much as happens in authoritarian countries across the globe. This is not OK.![]()
You said he does. Now explain. Unless you can't.
gotheem!
Can't even get the phrase right.
That doesn’t make sense. Clarify
Somebody needed to pick up what Comey couldn’t finish because he was fired. Or did you think the investigation would have disappear without Comey?
Trump and you are a match made in looney bin. I can see why you’re so attach dispite your claim you’re not.
Crazy recognizes crazy. Congrats
Former Fox News Military Analyst: I’m Convinced Putin Has a Grip on Trump
host Anderson Cooper noted Peters has experience with Russian intelligence, and
asked if he thought Vladimir Putin has “some sort of grip on President Trump.”
“I am convinced that Vladimir Putin has a grip on Trump,” Peters replied.
“When I first learned of the Steele dossier, it just rang true to me,” he continued.
“Because that’s how the Russians do things.
And before he became a candidate for president,
Donald Trump was the perfect target for Russian intelligence.
Here is someone who has no self-control,
a sense of sexual en lement and
intermittent financial crises.
That’s made to order for seduction by Russian intelligence.
I hope I am wrong.
I hope Putin doesn’t have a grip on him.”
we may very well look back on the “much-maligned” Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, as a hero.
He added that the Mueller investigation is the “most important” in his lifetime… and he lived through Watergate.
The appearance was Peters’ first cable news hit since
he ditched Fox News
with a nuclear email announcing his departure —
calling the network “a mere propaganda machine for a destructive and ethically ruinous administration.”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/former-f...grip-on-trump/
well, duh. Trash is Pootin's play thing.
What did I lose? And how is whatever you think I lost on spurstalk subforum more valuable than $2000?
Your self respect.
But maybe you had none to begin with.
My portfolio didn’t tank
Snarky Darrin seeing if the coast is clear.
Holy . This forum means way more to you and your life than I ever imagined.
Holy . #pizzagate means more to you and your life than I ever imagined.
Chris Has a lisp.![]()
A degenerate gambler doesn't have any self respect to begin with. I just hope he doesn't sell his house for the sake of his new born son.![]()
The house is full of guns and conspiracy theories.
Everything will be fine.
Holy . #pizzagate means nothing to me.
Do not reply to this until tomorrow at noon, your time. Prove to me this forum means nothing to you and you have the power to log off and walk away for 12 hours.
Tick tock.
Give me $2000 and you got a deal.
Do you take the bet?
Yes or no.
welshers talking about self respect
![]()
you don’t even know how to offer a bet
you would have already lost your attempt at a bet
no will power
spurstalk slave
TSA cares more about getting random board bets than self respect or even self predictions.
I like how 2 years later I'm still living rent free in your conspira brain.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)