Reply With Quote
lol who owns the Review-Journal?
Clinton campaign, DNC accused of corrupt money scheme
As many as 40 state-level Democratic parties may have been involved in a scheme to funnel as much as $84 million to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, a campaign finance lawyer contends.
Dan Backer, an attorney based in Virginia, has filed a lawsuit alleging that a plan was in place to cir vent campaign contribution limits set by the federal government, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported.
“You had individuals giving $300,000,” Backer told the newspaper Friday. “They’re not doing it because they care about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party. They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy influence with Hillary Clinton.”
- Dan Backer, campaign finance attorney
Nevada’s Democratic Party may become the latest pulled into a federal lawsuit that Backer has filed, the paper reported. Backer represents the Committee to Defend the President, a pro-Donald Trump political action committee that initially lodged a complaint in December with the Federal Election Commission, the report says.
Backer told the paper he filed his lawsuit because the FEC failed to meet a deadline for taking action.
He said the Hillary Victory Fund reported transferring more than $1.7 million to the Nevada Democratic Party between December 2015 and November 2016. But the party reported receiving only $146,200, which it transferred to the DNC.
The remaining $1.6 million was sent by the Hillary Victory Fund to the Nevada party and received by the DNC and never appeared on the Nevada party’s reports, Backer contends.
But Nevada's Democratic Party disputed Backer's claims.
“This is nothing more than a bogus political stunt feebly designed to distract from vulnerable Republicans’ disastrous agenda.”
- Helen Kalla, spokeswoman, Nevada Democratic Party
In Idaho, Democrats allegedly contributed $1.6 million to the plan in a series of 13 transactions, the Idaho Statesman reported.
But local party officials might have been unaware of how the money was being handled, the paper reported.
It is "reasonably possible the Idaho State Democratic Party had no prior knowledge of, or control over, these transfers because they were handled entirely by HVF, the DNC, HFA, [Hillary Victory Fund, Democratic National Committee, Hillary for America] and/or their treasurers," states the 101-page complaint that Backer’s group filed in December, the Statesman reported.
The Idaho Democratic Party did not respond to the newspaper’s request for a comment.
In Delaware, the state Democratic Party received $2.4 million from the Hillary Victory Fund over 11 transactions, then transferred roughly the same amount to the DNC, WXDE-FM radio reported.
The handling of cash in Delaware “doesn’t pass the sniff test,” Backer told the station.
But Jesse Chadderdon, executive director of the Delaware Democratic Party, called Backer’s lawsuit “yet another blatant example of hypocrisy from Donald Trump and his cronies.”
“Let’s be clear, this is nothing more than a Beltway political stunt,” Chadderdon told the station, “led by the pro-Trump PAC 'The Committee to Defend the President,' one that's simply designed to distract Delaware voters.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...t-alleges.html
lol who owns the Review-Journal?
Sperm shielding for your hag again.
so neither of you know.Sperm shielding for your hag again.
lol
Who does?
Dennison certainly knows. Major donor.
I know you're sperm shielding for your hag. Par.
let the chips fall. some people are awfully excited about a lawsuit.
not content to have beaten a billion dollar candidate, they're gonna sue her afterward for cheating.
buttsore winners, tbh.
You guys'll get her yet!
but hillary!!
Neither of you know.I know you're sperm shielding for your hag. Par.
I'm perfectly fine with the campaign's funding being reviewed. It will go just as well as every other "investigation" you guys have been pimping for the last 10 years.
Sperm shielding for your hag again.I know you're sperm shielding for your hag. Par.
Did chump come in with a suitable counter? Nope. He sperm shielded, bro. Come to terms.
There is no reason to counter anyone already on crutches.
Nope, you played a lame card. Textbook sperm shielding.
You said nothing that needed countering. I said investigate away.
She's still living rent free in your head for all eternity.
Textbook obsession.
lol
Textbook sperm shielding, bruh.
Saying go ahead and investigate her is shielding her from what?
Be specific.
Moving goalposts now. Common.
Yup. How Hillary "evolved". Her words, bruh.
hag = her words?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
