Trump still not giving any s about DeucheLand
![]()
merica is so ed smh. honestly wish you sons good luck, I don't want to even imagine the damage this administration is doing to your rights and quality of lifetrump and bolton look like out of a ing comic book
![]()
Trump still not giving any s about DeucheLand
![]()
subservient state where we stationed 21 military bases. Germany is basically our military equipment storage area and their women exist mainly to please our black military members
electing a tranny as your leader
Worse; Hitler's daughter!
http://noch.info/en/2017/12/angela-m...ter-of-hitler/
and rightfully so. merkel and that hole she's creating.
This. Europistan is finished
do you go out of your way to find the dumbest on the internet and then commit to those theories?
Read the link. Stop lashing out.
i read it. it was incredibly stupid.
Tell me how instead of throwing a tantrum.
there's no tantrum. you just posted a really stupid link and i pointed out that it was stupid.
the premise is stupid, and the "evidence" behind it is even more stupid.
So nothing. Just a lot of tears. Got it.
fine. the whole thing is based on some mystery stasi file
link to the stasi file they use as their source?
otherwise this is just some random person rambling on the internet with zero evidentiary basis behind any of his statements. making them entirely meaningless. you may as well read articles about rainbow colored unicorns
So, you have nothing to disprove the file other than tears though, correct?
of course this comes from Q
and as usual:
Derp: [bull claim]
anyone else: umm, that seems like bull . can you back it up?
Derp: so you cant disprove it?!?!?
It doesn't bother me if you don't believe it. My point is that you are crying about something you cannot disprove. You really need to believe it's untrue. You're like the one-handed Luke Skywalker crying that Vader can't be his father.![]()
you have no objective standard by which you do/don't believe things
if you went around believing anything that you couldn't personally disprove, then you'd believe in a lot of objectively stupid things.
and you do.
and when anybody actually sources/proves something you happen not to like, you brush it off as a biased source/CIA or some .
in the end, all you do is believe what you want to be true, regardless of merit/evidence, while not believing anything that challenges your precious worldview, regardless of the strength of supporting evidence
For all your crying that's exactly what you do, dude.
I've caught on to the fact that the power players love to control/manufacture the narrative. What is your problem? Grow up, dude.
Lmao, America is China's much more so
"i know you are but what am i" is your response? lol
and no, i tend to believe things when they are sourced or supported by evidence. you have no standard other than what fits your worldview/narrative. for instance, you dont like germany, merkel, therefore you believe she is literally hitler's daughter. there's nothing to actually support that belief. some some anonymous blog that references some spooky/secret do ent and you slurp it up like gospel.
the narrative is that you believe that has no evidence behind it when it suits your worldview. there is evidence to support that narrative
you dont like merkel? SHES HITLER
you dont like hogg? HE WASN'T AT SCHOOL
you dont like that the vegas shooter wasnt muslim/black? THERE WASN'T EVEN A SHOOTING
I gave you sources/evidence. Your problem is that it isn't system approved. You have this belief that the system doesn't bury a lot of truth. It's misguided to say the least.
Do you think the Nazis were just Hitler and the Germans and their allies? There were controlling factions. You should look into the history, and then you won't be so shocked by the "conspiracy theories". Now this one could be true; it could be false. But it is plausible with what I've studied. You should not assume I don't critically think; that's your error.
As for Hogg, I've presented contradictions. The official narrative is bunk. Ascertaining an exact truth is not something I can give you on a platter. But you take whatever is spoonfed and take it as truth. I'm glad I'm not you in that respect.
Vegas, I've studied not in depth, but I am aware of highly irregular actions by law enforcement / govt. in not disclosing information. Perhaps, my initial proposal that it was a hoax is incorrect, but you seem to think it's bad to question the narrative and be a good little piggy.
you haven't given me sources or evidence... you have linked some blog entry that references some obscure, secret Stasi file but does not produce it. there's no source material. you just linked me to some guy's opinion with no evidence to support it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)