Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Reck]

ching chong bing bong my calf tats are the bomb bomb.

[djohn2oo8]

^

[boutons_deux]

ing Texans and their ing politicians

Rep. Louie Gohmert: Mueller ‘Covering’ Up For Clinton and Plotting ‘Coup’ Against Trump

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-loui...against-trump/

[boutons_deux]

I been tellin' all y'all kickers

Pro-Brexit businessman met with Russian officials “multiple” times before the vote

Do ents suggest

Arron Banks, the businessman who funded Nigel Farage’s campaign to exit the EU,

lied about Russia

the United Kingdom has been conducting its own inquiry into Russia meddling.

U.K. officials have suspected that Leave.EU, the pro-Brexit campaign headed by UKIP leaders Nigel Farage and Arron Banks, received aid from Russia ahead of the pivotal referendum.

Banks emphatically denied any link to Russia, calling the allegations "complete bollocks from beginning to end." Banks has since maintained this credulity, yet new do ents seen by The Guardian suggest he's been lying.

a tight relationship between Banks and the Kremlin.

The do ents indicate Banks met with high-ranking Russian officials multiple times between November 2015 to 2017.

Two of those meetings took place during the same week Leave.EU launched its official campaign,

U.K. officials believe these discussions turned political,

as Banks had continued contact in the run-up to the U.S. elections. Banks' partner,

Farage, was a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump's campaign and even stumped for him on the campaign trail.

https://www.salon.com/2018/06/09/pro...s-before-vote/

[koriwhat]

i got a lot of s tucked in my ass and not necessarily between my legs.

[koriwhat]

I been tellin' all y'all kickers

you can tell a non-texan by the '. and you can tell a bandwagon fan just by their handle; ie, boutons_deux.

[monosylab1k]

you can tell a non-texan by the '. and you can tell a bandwagon fan just by their handle; ie, boutons_deux.

And you can tell a crackhead by their admitted trap house frequenting.

[DarrinS]

So this thread just devolved into a bunch of personal insults. Oh well.

[TSA]

So the leaks are real.

Let that sink in.

You aren’t claiming the leaks were all accurate are you?

[koriwhat]

And you can tell a crackhead by their admitted trap house frequenting.

lmao as if you know anything about anything you ol' sticky rice son of a .

[Pavlov]

You aren’t claiming the leaks were all accurate are you?

They're all fake?

OK. It's even less important as a story then.

Thanks!

[boutons_deux]

Roger Stone’s grandson is begging for money to pay his legal bills — Stone was supposed to ‘pay for my college education’



Roger Stone’s grandson Nick Stevens is begging for cash to help pay Stone’s legal bills.

Stevens has started a GoFundMe where he pleads for money to help

the veteran operative who had bragged of his ties to Russia and his involvement in dirty tricks. (aka rat ing)

“While it is very cool to have your grandfather be an important part of history,

(rat ing his way into history as nothing but a slimebag rat er, for 50 years)

I can tell you that is not fun for me to see my grandfather and our family under attack,” he writes.

(it's not "fun" to be rat ed by your piece of grandfather)

Stevens’ motives are not entirely pure—he needs money for college, and is worried his grandfather is going to spend it on lawyers.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/06/rog...ege-education/

Too bad about college, "bro", but you'd probably waste it frat-partying for 4 years

[DarrinS]

rawstory rat ing

[AaronY]

The swamp included both parties. I've never said otherwise.

I would pay good money to see you give a good exhaustive definition of this supposed Swamp™ complete with a list of names etc. like a wikipedia article. basically amounts to anyone who's been in government for a while who doesn't like trump pretty much

[djohn2oo8]

rawstory rat ing

That halfway explains your conception.

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[djohn2oo8]

[TSA]

[djohn2oo8]

Just a regular laugh emoticon? Nervous TSA.

[djohn2oo8]

[TSA]

"Grassley noted that he and the rest of the committee waited for more than a year for the Flynn criminal inquiry to conclude. "It has been more than five months since his guilty plea," Grassley wrote. "Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the cir stances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview."

The chairman specifically did not buy the department's argument that Grassley might be interfering with a "pending criminal prosecution." "There is no pending prosecution" with the guilty plea five months in the past, Grassley argued.

"Simply disclosing facts to the committee could not possibly 'interfere' with the case at this late date," Grassley continued, "assuming those facts are consistent with the representations that prosecutors arranged for Lt. General Flynn to swear to in federal court."

That was the little bomb in Grassley's letter: The chairman raised the possibility that the facts of the case — the evidence in the phone conversation transcript and the FBI 302 — might somehow be at odds with the particulars of Flynn's plea. And in case anyone missed the reference, in the next sentence, Grassley wrote: "If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish."

===============

"Beyond that — and this is referring to Congress generally, not Grassley specifically — there's no doubt that a number of Republicans suspect the Flynn case is not what it seems. They know that Flynn, a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, would have been keenly aware of U.S. surveillance capabilities and practices, and thus would have known that a conversation with the Russian ambassador was highly likely to be intercepted and recorded. They find it hard to believe that Flynn would have knowingly lied about a conversation when he knew his questioners had a transcript of the conversation."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...hael-flynn-302

[djohn2oo8]

"Grassley noted that he and the rest of the committee waited for more than a year for the Flynn criminal inquiry to conclude. "It has been more than five months since his guilty plea," Grassley wrote. "Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the cir stances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview."

The chairman specifically did not buy the department's argument that Grassley might be interfering with a "pending criminal prosecution." "There is no pending prosecution" with the guilty plea five months in the past, Grassley argued.

"Simply disclosing facts to the committee could not possibly 'interfere' with the case at this late date," Grassley continued, "assuming those facts are consistent with the representations that prosecutors arranged for Lt. General Flynn to swear to in federal court."

That was the little bomb in Grassley's letter: The chairman raised the possibility that the facts of the case — the evidence in the phone conversation transcript and the FBI 302 — might somehow be at odds with the particulars of Flynn's plea. And in case anyone missed the reference, in the next sentence, Grassley wrote: "If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish."

===============

"Beyond that — and this is referring to Congress generally, not Grassley specifically — there's no doubt that a number of Republicans suspect the Flynn case is not what it seems. They know that Flynn, a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, would have been keenly aware of U.S. surveillance capabilities and practices, and thus would have known that a conversation with the Russian ambassador was highly likely to be intercepted and recorded. They find it hard to believe that Flynn would have knowingly lied about a conversation when he knew his questioners had a transcript of the conversation."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...hael-flynn-302

What is your conspiracy theory on this?

[Pavlov]

"Grassley noted that he and the rest of the committee waited for more than a year for the Flynn criminal inquiry to conclude. "It has been more than five months since his guilty plea," Grassley wrote. "Thus, there is no longer any legitimate reason to withhold facts from the Senate about the cir stances of his conversations with the Russian ambassador and his FBI interview."

The chairman specifically did not buy the department's argument that Grassley might be interfering with a "pending criminal prosecution." "There is no pending prosecution" with the guilty plea five months in the past, Grassley argued.

"Simply disclosing facts to the committee could not possibly 'interfere' with the case at this late date," Grassley continued, "assuming those facts are consistent with the representations that prosecutors arranged for Lt. General Flynn to swear to in federal court."

That was the little bomb in Grassley's letter: The chairman raised the possibility that the facts of the case — the evidence in the phone conversation transcript and the FBI 302 — might somehow be at odds with the particulars of Flynn's plea. And in case anyone missed the reference, in the next sentence, Grassley wrote: "If the facts are inconsistent with the plea agreement, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish."

===============

"Beyond that — and this is referring to Congress generally, not Grassley specifically — there's no doubt that a number of Republicans suspect the Flynn case is not what it seems. They know that Flynn, a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, would have been keenly aware of U.S. surveillance capabilities and practices, and thus would have known that a conversation with the Russian ambassador was highly likely to be intercepted and recorded. They find it hard to believe that Flynn would have knowingly lied about a conversation when he knew his questioners had a transcript of the conversation."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...hael-flynn-302

Of course there's a reason to keep the information from leaking via Congress.

Flynn is still cooperating. Were he not, he'd already be sentenced.

Sorry TSA, this is political bull and you're eating it up with a serving spoon.

[Chris]

Flynn is still cooperating. Were he not, he'd already be sentenced.

Can you elaborate on your conspiracy theory here?