Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Retiring

[spurraider21]

oh thanks

could have at least included the preceding porno

[baseline bum]

[ducks]

REPORT: Woman Has Boyfriend Punch Stomach Repeatedly To Kill Unborn Baby, County Weighing Murder Charge
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32445...mpaign=dwbrand

[Chris]

REPORT: Woman Has Boyfriend Punch Stomach Repeatedly To Kill Unborn Baby, County Weighing Murder Charge
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32445...mpaign=dwbrand

Blue state issues, God help us.

[Pavlov]

Blue state issues, God help us.

Red county issues.

[SnakeBoy]

REPORT: Woman Has Boyfriend Punch Stomach Repeatedly To Kill Unborn Baby, County Weighing Murder Charge
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32445...mpaign=dwbrand

In other words, the two conspired together, and executed a plot to kill a seven-and-a-half-month-old baby inside the womb.

In a morally just world, these two would be charged.

But they likely won't be, for the mother consented to the murder of her child, thus linking it to legalized abortion reality (and "choice" talking points), and somehow making it an acceptable act that would bypass such charges.

Liberal logic

[Pavlov]

Liberal logic

"Bakersfield liberals"

[rmt]

REPORT: Woman Has Boyfriend Punch Stomach Repeatedly To Kill Unborn Baby, County Weighing Murder Charge
https://www.dailywire.com/news/32445...mpaign=dwbrand

That's so disgusting.

[dbestpro]

One of the things I read that has not been posted in this thread is the reason Justice Kennedy is retiring is so that he can be replaced by a conservative before the election. This seems to balance the cries of the left who are trying to find a way to flip the inevitable outcome.

[SnakeBoy]

One of the things I read that has not been posted in this thread is the reason Justice Kennedy is retiring is so that he can be replaced by a conservative before the election. This seems to balance the cries of the left who are trying to find a way to flip the inevitable outcome.

It's not inevitable, Democrats have a well thought out plan to stop it

Come up with some tactics to block the nomination
Win the Senate this fall
Hold the seat open for 2 years
Hold onto the Senate and win the White House in 2020
Then nominate a liberal to fill the seat and somehow stop the Republicans from copying the same tactics they came up with to block the nomination in the first place

[pgardn]

Would you agree there is a contingency of pro-choicers that employ the "it's not a life" argument?

If so, would you agree that those people argue "science sez" (kind of like the gender fluid "science sez/doesn't say", there isn't a scientific consensus there but it's still argued) ?

That same audience is generally deep rooted Leftists. You can't deny that "morality" and decency isn't a talking point/bragging right of the Left, the Left's candidate lost her lead calling people who didn't agree with them on most issues as "deplorable". I don't know how that can't be taken as a "holier-than-thou" statement. This is the audience my feelings and statements are targeted at.

For example, discussing the Mexicans who get separated from their families- an unabashed, staunch Leftist like RG calls it "evil". Objectively, how much recourse does the government have when the law is being enforced? The law is consensus and fully objective. Who's the authoritarian to deem what evil? I'd bet dollars to pesos that RG is hardcore pro-choice and would probably argue with the established, but not consensus, science that states it isn't a life and why it isn't "evil" to kill a baby but "Evil" to separate a child from their family when their family broke an objective law.

I completely understand and admit it goes both ways but my argument/stance isn't aimed at a whole group and I'm not generalizing a whole group, I'm arguing against a specific group that is large inside of the whole group.

Wait, wait, wait...

Science says nothing actually.

Science says what is your definition of life? and further a human life for philosophy
In textbooks for students they attempt to define what they are going to use as a working definition of life.

Sure pro abortion/choice are going to bring up this point. And sure some are going to say it’s not a life because... but I would say that’s a minority. What they will say is YOU go to the women and tell her she can’t do that and then YOU adopt the child. Saying life begins at conception is really quite silly. You are using a scientific sequence of events to set a judgement about what life, and a human life, is. That’s treading on philosophical grounds. You really got to do some pontification and shaky logic.

Having said all this I totally respect the pro life movement and those that step to the plate (adopt)

[boutons_deux]

Loans of over $1 Billion to Trump by SCOTUS justice Kennedy's son, but nothing to see here...

Anthony Kennedy’s son works for Deutschbank and has loaned Trump over $1 billion in real estate loans.

....when he was a real estate developer, according to two people with knowledge of his role.

During Mr. Kennedy's tenure, Deutsche Bank became Mr. Trump's most important lender, dispensing well over $1 billion in loans to him...

But they had a connection, one Mr. Trump was quick to note in the moments after his first address to Congress in February 2017. As he made his way out of the chamber, Mr. Trump paused to chat with the justice.

“Say o to your boy,” Mr. Trump said. “Special guy.”

Mr. Trump was apparently referring to Justice Kennedy’s son, Justin.

The younger Mr. Kennedy spent more than a decade at Deutsche Bank, eventually rising to become the bank’s global head of real estate capital markets, and he worked closely with Mr. Trump when he was a real estate developer,

During Mr. Kennedy’s tenure, Deutsche Bank became Mr. Trump’s most important lender, dispensing well over $1 billion in loans to him for the renovation and construction of skyscrapers in New York and Chicago at a time other mainstream banks were wary of doing business with him because of his troubled business history.



https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre

[ducks]

do you not wish you had assets to get a billion dollar loan?

[Trainwreck2100]

lel eat roe v wade

[boutons_deux]

With Trump Ready to Name Far-Right Justice, Poll Shows Nearly 70 Percent in US Want Women's Abortion Rights Protected

"President Trump has promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade. That promise should set off alarm bells for anyone who cares about women—and the Cons ution."

The Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that

67 percent of respondents want Roe untouched,

including 81 percent of Democrats and

73 percent of independent voters.

Skewing the overall result downward, of course, are the 53 percent of Republicans polled who do favor stripping women of their right to control their own bodies –

the key protection enshrined in the 1973 landmark case.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...us-want-womens

[koriwhat]

With Trump Ready to Name Far-Right Justice, Poll Shows Nearly 70 Percent in US Want Women's Abortion Rights Protected

"President Trump has promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade. That promise should set off alarm bells for anyone who cares about women—and the Cons ution."

The Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that

67 percent of respondents want Roe untouched,

including 81 percent of Democrats and

73 percent of independent voters.

Skewing the overall result downward, of course, are the 53 percent of Republicans polled who do favor stripping women of their right to control their own bodies –

the key protection enshrined in the 1973 landmark case.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...us-want-womens

whats the percentage of women getting abortions due to incest/rape/etc and not just from being a bunch of pof/tinder s these days?

"stripping women of their right to control their own bodies" lmao! didn't control spreading them legs though.

[spurraider21]

whats the percentage of women getting abortions due to incest/rape/etc and not just from being a bunch of pof/tinder s these days?

"stripping women of their right to control their own bodies" lmao! didn't control spreading them legs though.

ultimately irrelevant. you have a cons utional right to privacy. and there are other confidentiality issues with anything one would share with a medical professional, including the reason for an abortion.

[koriwhat]

ultimately irrelevant. you have a cons utional right to privacy. and there are other confidentiality issues with anything one would share with a medical professional, including the reason for an abortion.

let's be realistic and explore all variables of today's society for a minute... s are everywhere these days masquerading as women with morals.

[spurraider21]

let's be realistic and explore all variables of today's society for a minute... s are everywhere these days masquerading as women with morals.

and you are the expert on demographics, aren't you

either way, im sure it's not that hard to look up the reported figures if you really wanted to, keeping in mind that they are all selective/self reporting

[spurraider21]

people blame crime, poverty, welfare on lazy kids with poor parenting, and yet think it will be better for society if admittedly unread, unprepared, and financially deficient parents to be forced have a child and try to raise them, ultimately setting them up for failure and contributing to the problems listed at the beginning of this post

[koriwhat]

and you are the expert on demographics, aren't you

either way, im sure it's not that hard to look up the reported figures if you really wanted to, keeping in mind that they are all selective/self reporting

easy as opening up tinder/www.

[Chris]

"financially deficient parents to be forced have a child and try to raise them"

[SnakeBoy]

people blame crime, poverty, welfare on lazy kids with poor parenting, and yet think it will be better for society if admittedly unread, unprepared, and financially deficient parents to be forced have a child and try to raise them, ultimately setting them up for failure and contributing to the problems listed at the beginning of this post

so you're advocating that we kill the admittedly unread, unprepared, and financially deficient parents

[SnakeBoy]

or just sterilize them?

[spurraider21]

so you're advocating that we kill the admittedly unread, unprepared, and financially deficient parents

nope not at all