I think so as well.
I think he will be a Spur soon.
I think so as well.
This is why I put the odds at a trade with the Sixers/Celts/Lakers at <50%. The Lakers are playing hardball since the news Kawhi wants LA was floated (Magic thinks he can just wait a year and get him as a FA without giving up anything), and the Celtics are likely ok with what they have considering they made it so far with their best 2 players on the shelf. Sixers likely just want LeBron and don't want to trade away any of their core (besides maybe dangling the redundant Fultz now that Simmons has emerged as a superstar). And Spurs want none of the 2nd rate goods/would try to patch things up with Leonard versus trade for crap.
rofl Eddy Curry. Dude was a joke in terms of desire to be great
Tyson Chandler's description was pretty accurate though. Great role player, not really HOF/superstar but damn good career.
http://www.nbadraft.net/players/tyson-chandler
Yeah I'd rather have ingram too. I don't get the fultz love
I like Fultz. I see his shiftiness and he seems like he has a plethora of scoring moves but I don’t trust his shot or confidence to stay in tact. Ingram on the other hand.. his only concern for me is his durability. After watching several vids I see that he has a lot of potential and a pretty good feel for the game. I think if Spurs can land him he’ll become really good under their development.
he can't shoot 3s and is in general a bad player. He doesn't pass the eye test. He has probably reached his ceiling as far as ppg.
Don't want this skinny guy on the Spurs. He is not that great of a trade target for Leonard.
Stoned. You mean stoned.
I would rather have Mikal Bridges than Ingram.
Tbh lot of ST need to watch that game Fakers took GS to overtime and then check back in an talk about Ingram.
Welcome new Spur franchise player![]()
Please let this basilica still be constructed. Otherwise we get Tobias Harris or some other useless
Would happily take Ingram at this point tbh. Hopefully they don't ing settle for some bull package centered around Kuzma tbh.
I think he has high upside, I think he would fit in great. We basically played without Kawhi all last season, its all additions at this point. Maybe Ingram actually talks.
I don’t see lakers giving up BI or Kuz for Kiwi. Maybe lonzo![]()
That got zo is "injured" and can't be traded anyway. I don't think the Spurs trade Kawhi without BI in the package. Honestly someone will give them a better package than Zo, doubtful we trade him to the Lakers without BI in the package. Think Spurs would hold onto him for the season before they made a trade centered around any other gots.
Ingram isn't going to be Kawhi great obviously, but he could be a future all star. Like you said, we won nearly 50 last year without Kawhi playing any additions are a plus to what we had last year.
Why can't they trade him? It's a known injury, so that would factor into the value.
Spurs aren't trading Kawhi to the Lakers, period.
I suppose, would rather not have that got and the circus that comes with him though.
I think you may be wrong there. We aren't competing for a le in the near future. Might as well get some young pieces to start the rebuild. Ingram is probably the best value we are going to get with that ass hole Kawhi saying he only wants to go to LA.
I dong think that’s true. They will definitely consider it.
i just dont think the lakers have the pieces to put together an enticing offer even if they wanted to
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)