Reply With Quote
Sad to think these bums are influencing kids.Marco making more than Cousins
If things get hard run away
Cheat to win
Loyalty means nothing
Sad to see people raise their kids this way
Marco making more than Cousins
Sad to think these bums are influencing kids.Marco making more than Cousins
If things get hard run away
Cheat to win
Loyalty means nothing
Sad to see people raise their kids this way
They're influencing kids to put their teams and winning over money, actually
You guys used to love that and would complain about athletes only caring about money..
It's one thing to leave a few mil on the table to help keep the core together and bring guys in or retain role players. But for all star players signing cheap ass deals for the lulz? Cmon that's totally different
Not really. TypicalThey're influencing kids to put their teams and winning over money, actually
You guys used to love that and would complain about athletes only caring about money..
Winning or money, can’t serve two masters at once. Glad he chose to win.They're influencing kids to put their teams and winning over money, actually
You guys used to love that and would complain about athletes only caring about money..
Lost in the circus:
1. Superteams are LeBron’s own doing. He possibly can’t complain about this.
2. Lakers really thought they were king of the west? Maybe next year.
3. Lakers fans thinking Boogie would come over this year
4. Leverage? When they’re not even the clear favorites in the West? Makes more sense for Leonard to head East
5. Essentially traded Rondo for Randle, with a chance of relegating Lonzo Ball to the bench. BBB = Bench Bum Ballers
In esse, LeBron traded being swept in four games in the Finals for getting beaten in four games during the regular season.
Yup, clearly an apples & oranges comparison.
celtics did it before lebron. at first KG refused to go to boston, but once they picked up ray allen too he was suddenly cool with itLost in the circus:
1. Superteams are LeBron’s own doing. He possibly can’t complain about this.
2. Lakers really thought they were king of the west? Maybe next year.
3. Lakers fans thinking Boogie would come over this year
4. Leverage? When they’re not even the clear favorites in the West? Makes more sense for Leonard to head East
5. Essentially traded Rondo for Randle, with a chance of relegating Lonzo Ball to the bench. BBB = Bench Bum Ballers
In esse, LeBron traded being swept in four games in the Finals for getting beaten in four games during the regular season.
Dumb response. We all know if lebron stayed his Whole career in cle he would be goat. Now hes like 3to7
[SneakerReporter] Tyreke to Indiana 1yr/12m
Dumber response. GOAT of what? Ohio?
Lol how dumb are you? No one with a brain recognizes his cheating rings, does more damage than good. Same said for warriors with durant.Dumber response. GOAT of what? Ohio?
Legacy would be he made it to the finals more times than anyone but didnt have help. Always better than he couldnt win without collusion.
Apparently not as dumb as you are. Number of finals played without any help doesn’t go on the league annals. He’s going to be remembered for not being able to carry a team to a championship, the number of finals matchups he lost, and the empty stats he put up. Karl Malone was good, kept losing to the Bulls, and stayed with one team until he headed to LA but isn’t as celebrated as Jordan, arguably the GOAT. Kobe put up a lot of empty stats but you can’t argue against his five championships, even if those had asterisks. A championship validates a great player’s legacy. You play a sport to win, not to languish on a team just because the same team drafted you. Loyalty is overrated but winning will never be.
It would have if he played in cle his whole career. Thats what you fail to grasp. Youre still comparing to what hes done rather than what he should have
Not to mention you proved my point. Moving to la instantly put him behind bryant and shaq.
Your point was he could be the greatest of all time had he stayed in one team and accomplished zero championships. He won in Miami, won one in Cleveland. The move away from Cleveland bore fruit. Your measure of greatness is sticking to one team and getting nothing. You’ve proven nothing by giving hypotheticals, especially in the field of sports, where success is more often than not measured by wins. I don’t know how you can be the greatest if you keep failing at the sport’s biggest stage. If that’s the case Stockton should have been the GOAT in your terms. But he’s not, shocker.
Maybe because they played exponentially better without you
There's a decent chance that tholdren actually does think Stockton is the GOAT, fyi
The move away from cleveland solidified he lacked goat compe iveness. He was never in consoderation after the miami debacle. Ray allen and kl saved his legacy by big shot and choke. You already admitted he fell when he moved to la. Stockton was one of the greatest pg to play the game. You just dont put anything into context. That would be like me saying you think fisher is better than stockton based on rings. Dumb
Most underrated pg of all time.There's a decent chance that tholdren actually does think Stockton is the GOAT, fyi
He has as many rings as Murray
Kawhi's trade value has gone drastically down with Beta Cousins' move, tbh. No other team will give anyone of value for a 1 year rental on a season that has been rendered null and void today...other than the Lakers. But Kawhi. Let's hold him and let him rot away another year. That will be some little victory, at least.
You must rate adam morrison really high...He has as many rings as Murray
I didn’t say base it on rings, I said base it on wins as the most substantial contributor to your team’s success. This is so re ed but what did I expect from you. Of all people. Harlem said there are people who take a lot of money instead of prioritizing winning. Now here’s a guy who prioritizes winning and is willing to take a pay cut (Cousins). So which is it? You gave a hypothetical situation which never happened and the results of which we don’t know to prop up a lame conclusion. But hey maybe John Stockton really is the GOAT. Fits your criteria perfectly.
Then you just agreed, lbj contributed most to cle success, even moreso if he stayed. Again proving my point. ThanksI didn’t say base it on rings, I said base it on wins as the most substantial contributor to your team’s success. This is so re ed but what did I expect from you. Of all people. Harlem said there are people who take a lot of money instead of prioritizing winning. Now here’s a guy who prioritizes winning and is willing to take a pay cut (Cousins). So which is it? You gave a hypothetical situation which never happened and the results of which we don’t know to prop up a lame conclusion. But hey maybe John Stockton really is the GOAT. Fits your criteria perfectly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
