What's weird about Jabari Young's and some sports journalists' response:
1. The Express News People (Mike Finger, Jeff McDonald, and Jabari) have all been quiet about Mike Wright's report. It's either this is something they've known to be true or to be false. It might be journalistic envy since they weren't chosen to leak these stories. Jabari has always touted "shopping local", which I assume pertains to consuming San Antonio Spurs news from local journalists such as himself. He teased about Spurs fans getting spoiled, only to be disappointed with news Leonard demands to be traded. He then backpedaled some rappers' albums are coming out. They were great albums but he had to go through a lot of backpedaling there. This guy has no solid sources, or if he does, he has been given bits and morsels sparingly and thinks he leaks them exclusively.
2. Regardless, they've done nothing to verify Wright's report. No refutations, no verification, no retweets, no comments, nothing. That is EXTREMELY weird. We've heard nothing about the All-Star game stories or the New York stories so far and they've done nothing to verify such, nor comment on these things. Journalistic envy or fake news? Shop local or believe Mike Wright? Either way, it's weird local newsmen (if sports journalists count as legitimate news writers) haven't heard or picked up on this.
3. It's eerie Jabari keeps saying it doesn't change a thing. It does. As exstatic said, it emphasizes the Spurs are done with Leonard's group and affects his trade value. At this point I'm not sure as to whom to believe since it's all smoke and mirrors and PR battles. It's weird someone like Jabari takes the player's side. He must know something we don't or he loves Kawhi's schlong constantly prodding his prostate.
4. Jabari keeps stressing he's willing to talk to Leonard during interviews and/or media day, but has no inclination to interview the Spurs' front office. Is it difficult to call the Spurs organization to confirm? Is it so difficult to piece things together? Most replies to his tweet have already noticed his bias for airing Kawhi's side, not to mention his predilection for saying the Spurs do not know how to handle modern stars. The Spurs may be wrong on that regard too, but how hard is it to say you want out? Apparently not so, especially if you don't have pressing reasons other than a botched shoe deal and the hopes of getting more money.
5. Also weird Wojnarowski, Shelburne, and/or Marc Stein don't have anything to add to Wright's report. Usually sports writers add new spins to generate more buzz and retweets, and that's usually practice among sports journalists. I assume they know it's hokum or journalistic envy because the Spurs' FO didn't choose them to become mouthpieces. I think by now we can safely assume some of these journalists act as PR specialists for players as well and there's a faction that keeps wanting to spur a trade (whom I believe Impact Sports leaks their stories to) and a smaller group whom the Spurs front office prefers.
Jabari and friends if you're reading this I hope an investigative report follows. Something more detailed and professional, perhaps? Something more in-depth and balanced, not blatantly biased. Would it change a thing? No, but it'll help your journalistic credentials more than licking Kawhi's butthole for an interview, since journalists have ethical standards that mandate airing sides of both parties and showing all possible angles. Ben Detrick came out with an amazing piece on Bryan Colangelo and I'm sure the Express News writers can do something commensurate. Or maybe not, I guess some journalists just aren't that great.