You found a new lady?
Yes or no.
Lol loaded question to divert attention.
Poor derp
You found a new lady?
Yes or no.
I dont think so. You just admitted to wanting the . Your invitation was posted publicly.
Like the invitation you made Avante about eating your ass.
Easy there. You're not at one of your tranny dens, where that is pretty much the subtext of all your convos.![]()
You're the one pitching woo to him, smartguy. You're the one calling out to men at 3am. You're not good with words and you're taking L's as often as you'd prefer taking schlong. You're dumb and a .
There you go.
Yes.
Maybe you'll find a dude to call your own.![]()
Does she know you're a cuck yet?
More woo pitching. Well, endless whiffing on your end, but still...you're a .
Do you have a stake in Blake's personal life? You're getting a little too involved for someone who claims not to be a total sexual.
What's next? You're going to give Blake's new girl fashion tips?
I'll leave that to you two when you have your girl's night out. He's really into girl power movies. You two could catch a chick flick or something.![]()
Sounds better than crying out to men on a message board when you're all alone at 3am every night.![]()
Out of more than 136 million votes cast, Trump’s victory in the Electoral College came down to a razor-thin edge of only 77,744 votes across three states: Pennsylvania (44,292 votes), Wisconsin (22,748 votes), and Michigan (10,704 votes). These votes represent a Trump margin of 0.7 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 0.7 percentage points in Wisconsin, and 0.2 percentage points in Michigan. If Clinton had won these states, she would now be president. And of course Clinton actually won the popular vote by 2.9 million votes, receiving 48.2 percent of all votes compared to Trump’s 46.1 percent. The real story of 2016 is that there was just enough movement in just the right places, just enough increased turnout from just the right groups, to get Trump the electoral votes he needed to win.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...merica/532587/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...merica/532587/The clearest example of evangelical ethics bending to fit the Trump presidency is white evangelicals’ abandonment of their conviction that personal character matters for elected officials. In 2011 and again just ahead of the 2016 election, PRRI asked Americans whether a political leader who committed an immoral act in his or her private life could nonetheless behave ethically and fulfill their duties in their public life. In 2011, consistent with the “values voter” brand and the traditional evangelical emphasis on the importance of personal character, only 30 percent of white evangelical Protestants agreed with this statement. But with Trump at the top of the Republican ticket in 2016, 72 percent of white evangelicals said they believed a candidate could build a kind of moral dike between his private and public life. In a head-spinning reversal, white evangelicals went from being the least likely to the most likely group to agree that a candidate’s personal immorality has no bearing on his performance in public office.
Dude got that right. If I ever hear a conservative blather on about "family values" and "personal character"...
None of that matters to them. Power does, and that is it.
You're asking if she knows she's cheating on me yet.
Smh poor re ed derp
hmm, are you forgetting money, grifter "pastors"?
Hive mind. You're only the fifth chumpette to use that schtick.![]()
She's cheating on herself by even being with you. She going elsewhere is yet another foregone conclusion.
![]()
Now you're really just babbling in between emoticons
Poor derp
Maybe dont be here in graveyard shift hours asking about other dudes then.
Derp is a .
Yea, cos the mentions were time sensitive.
Today's desperate tranny chump follower.
She gonna have a what da have I done moment, bruh; unless she's a real loser, which is possible evidenced by her being with you. Even then, she'll still probably have that moment.![]()
For you. Not for the people getting mentioned which btw go on ignore because the mere derptacular name gives away your response without seeing said post.
It says about you that you're up in the wee hours of the day thinking about s. Which leads to people to think you are . Which you are.
Here ya go. This is precious.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/vid...mercial-plane/
You saying that anyone contacting you must be thinking of sucking s (for the umpteenth time).
Today's tranny.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)