Reply With Quote
whataboutism
publicity stunt
deflection from Mueller bulldozing Trash and his mafiya
Pootin's boy toy
CNN panel appalled by Trump’s ‘jaw-dropping’ declaration that meeting Putin will be easier than meeting allies
“I have NATO, I have the UK, which is somewhat in turmoil, and I have Putin,” Trump said.
“Frankly, Putin may be the easiest of them all – who would think?”
“Vladimir Putin, to say that he’s a compe or, to say it’s too early to say what his intentions are, we have plenty of do entation,” Avlon said.
“This is the president continuing to keep Putin close. And
to say that Putin is a friendlier, easier meeting than with our oldest allies in the world
is simply jaw-dropping.”
Avlon then hinted that we should be su ious of Trump’s continued love affair with Putin — and whether there is anything deeper behind it.
“He’s sticking to that line [with Putin],” he said. “You have to ask yourself: ‘Why?'”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/cnn-panel-appalled-trumps-jaw-dropping-declaration-meeting-putin-will-easier-meeting-allies/
whataboutism
publicity stunt
deflection from Mueller bulldozing Trash and his mafiya
i'm amazed neither the judge nor flynn's attorneys brought up the imminent withdrawal of the guilty plea
"prosecution doesn't intend on presenting evidence not relevant to the charges being brought"
Ok. Tell me why this is shocking to you?
wow, the dumb rightwing assholes."prosecution doesn't intend on presenting evidence not relevant to the charges being brought"
Ok. Tell me why this is shocking to you?
Mueller is after Manafort for financial crimes,
... NOT YET for colluding in the Trash-Pootin circle jerk.
Trash/mafiya collusion case with Pootin is NOT DEAD!
When convict Manafort sees the decades and $Ms owed, he will flip for reduced penalty, telling what he knows about Trash collusion.
yeah i mean... manafort isn't being charged with election related collusion, so why is it such a surprise that mueller wont be presenting evidence about election related collusion?
muller job was Russia nothing else
lol CNN
lol Pavlov
OK, Chris -- tell us all what REALLY happened at today's hearing you had no idea was happening until you read my post.
lol CNN
lol Pavlov
WASHINGTON – An attorney for Michael Flynn says the former national security adviser is "eager" to proceed to sentencing and put his criminal case behind him.
Attorney Robert Kelner made the comments during a court hearing Tuesday before U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan. It was the first time Flynn had appeared in court since his guilty plea last year to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials during the presidential transition and his Turkish lobbying work.
Kelner says Flynn wants to put this "chapter" behind him, but special counsel Robert Mueller's team has requested an additional delay while the retired U.S. Army general continues to cooperate with the Russia investigation.
Sullivan agreed to the delay Tuesday, saying he didn't want to "micromanage" Flynn's cooperation with prosecutors.
I accept your white flag.
Flynn is still cooperating.
Judge Sullivan approves.
You can't prove otherwise.
lol Chris
lol CNN
lol Pavlov
I broke Chris.
Too easy.
Tells me he should register as a foreign agent this time around.
It’s not shocking at all. I’ve consistently said there wasn’t collusion with Russia to sway the election."prosecution doesn't intend on presenting evidence not relevant to the charges being brought"
Ok. Tell me why this is shocking to you?
Steele dossier accused Manafort of being the mastermind behind the collusion it’s surprising that after a year Mueller still hasn’t found it.
Oh, what part of the dossier says that?
It's cute that you think he has to be tried on every single possible charge at once though.
That's not what the do ent says, numbnuts.
either you are too stupid to understand that or deliberately lying about it.
My guess is the latter at this point. I don't think you give a flying about the truth at this point.
When it is Mueller time, we will get to find out what he knows or found out.
Until then, your statement that he didn't find anything is pathetic and stupid, per par.
ok. lets assume that's 100% true.
however, as we know, the indictments currently before manafort are NOT concerning that collusion. they're for money laundering/bank fraud. so why would they be presenting evidence unrelated to those charges?
Page 7.
https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...legations.html
I’m not sure how you didn’t know that was a claim by Steele. Have you even read the dossier?
It’s cute you are still holding out hope for det collusion.
still holding out hope
There are currently 24 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 24 guests)
Posting Permissions
