Reply With Quote
Why did the Senate intel committee say Russia indeed interfered in the election, Darrin?
Explain.
muhRussia = muhRedHerring
Why did the Senate intel committee say Russia indeed interfered in the election, Darrin?
Explain.
muhRussia is about collusion, not breadcrumb Facebook bots.
Or high level Dems falling for lame phishing attack
Or questionable IT practices of the DNC
Or rigging the primary against Bernie
muhRussia is about collusion, not breadcrumb Facebook bots.
But you did back down.
Your "mastermind" backdown question has been answered.
For the second: No leaks from the Special Counsel as usual.
Sorry.
This is how we can tell u mad, TSA.
You backed down. Don't be upset about it. You do it quote often.
Great.
Repeat them.
Seems important to you.
It's funny because you have been influenced by trolls and fake news and conspiracy peddlers on the internet more than anyone.
No wonder you're so defensive.
I could not be less mad right now.
I’m literally laughing at how pathetic you are trying to score internet points off semantics. It’d be like me claiming you’re mad because you just said quote instead of quite.
You keep clinging to Steele saying Manafort managed the collusion operation and didn’t mastermind it. I’ll continue watching your Steele dossier crumble.
I could not be less mad right now.
I’m literally laughing at how pathetic you are trying to score internet points off semantics. It’d be like me claiming you’re mad because you just said quote instead of quite.
You keep clinging to Steele saying Manafort managed the collusion operation and didn’t mastermind it. I’ll continue watching your Steele dossier crumble.
However, according to the recent do ents, it was Weissmann that called for the meeting. On April 12–one day after the meeting–the AP published the explosive expose on Manafort.
“The meeting raises serious concerns about whether a violation of grand jury secrecy occurred,” stated Kevin Downing, “Manafort’s lawyer, in a motion requesting a hearing. “Based on the FBI’s own notes of the meeting, it is beyond question that a hearing is warranted.”
SaraACarter.com first reported in January the meeting between Weissmann and the Associated Press. However, these current court do ents, which include electronic communications and a complaint filed by the FBI against Weissmann, are the first indication that it was Weissmann who called for the meeting.”
https://saraacarter.com/court-docs-a...manafort-case/
Was he on Mueller's team when that meeting occurred, TSA?However, according to the recent do ents, it was Weissmann that called for the meeting. On April 12–one day after the meeting–the AP published the explosive expose on Manafort.
“The meeting raises serious concerns about whether a violation of grand jury secrecy occurred,” stated Kevin Downing, “Manafort’s lawyer, in a motion requesting a hearing. “Based on the FBI’s own notes of the meeting, it is beyond question that a hearing is warranted.”
SaraACarter.com first reported in January the meeting between Weissmann and the Associated Press. However, these current court do ents, which include electronic communications and a complaint filed by the FBI against Weissmann, are the first indication that it was Weissmann who called for the meeting.”
https://saraacarter.com/court-docs-a...manafort-case/
Question pending, TSA.
Was he on Mueller's team when that meeting occurred, TSA?
Sorry, you still have a question pending.
I already asked you to post it again.
Step up.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Posting Permissions
