Reply With Quote
Not a huge fan, but depends on the $$$ and years, tbh... every NBA team needs to have a full roster. Dude is only entering his 3rd season...
Manu isn't coming back
Not a huge fan, but depends on the $$$ and years, tbh... every NBA team needs to have a full roster. Dude is only entering his 3rd season...
Paul's contract won't be guaranteed, Green will probably play SF only, Manu will probably retire & hopefully Forbes is insurance. Still with Murray, Mills, White, Beli, it doesn't leave any place for Walker in the Guard or small Forward rotation.
Terrible signing
Wow Spurs9!!!!!! And an thought you were trolling....PATFO must have been reading my post and offered that to Bertans
I don’t mind. Why even try? We’re not gonna win anyway so just pay the young guys and develop them. It’s not like we’re compe ive and hope a few make a jump.
Lol what a post. Typical. You bums sound a lot like pounding the rock. Bunch of low iq posters here
No Duncan... Getting Aldridge and grooming Kawhi has stalled what virtually every great team suffers when the best player in its history retires.
Pop is still a great coach Spurs FO still solid despite some shaky signings/extensions.
Proof of this is they have not panicked or hit the toilet yet...
But if yall do... So many teams have hard to judge them harshly.
All that being said...
Maginka is doing a better job the past two years as I said yesterday.
No, what you did yesterday was trying to justify horrible decisions like a homer.
And no, resigning an 11th guy to a 2.5 million contract is still not as bad as squandering several lottery picks in a row.
what a garbage ing signing. only a complete re would think bringing forbes back is a a good idea
b-b-but he shot the highest % on the team last year
Honestly, this contract would've made much more sense had Mills not been been re-signed summer 2017 . . . Forbes is much cheaper just with a lower BBIQ.
Forbes is also a significantly worse player than Patty
Forbes will get a chance to at SG and PG before White
Pop loves his ball three guard lineups.
I expect way too much Mills-Forbes-Marco lineup minutes giving up 140 points per 100 possessions
Definitely pure opinion. Very untrue
Here is the problem.
White, Walker, Beli, Mills, and Forbes all cannot play SF. They cannot guard a SF. Beli at times maybe, and only if it's against a non-scoring undersize wing. Murray could theoretically guard a SF, but we have not seen this in action. So Green and Gay have to play and guard SF's. And we still don't know whats happening with Leonard or who we are getting.
They have not squandered. RANDLE gave us 4 years and we let him go because we only doing one year deals. I already outlined why the Russell trade was smart.. BALL and Ingram are still on the team. But whatever. You can pretend Lakers haven't made great moves... We will see. These wasted picks swept the Spurs last year and now have LeBron in Randle's place...
Trading Russel was a terrible move
Honestly . . . it's true. Really bad shot selection from panicking.
Russell trade was good for both sides but definitely favors us. We wouldn't even trade Kuzma for Russell straight up yet we shed over $60 million and got a year of Lopez. Your take is beyond dumb and Lonzo was not part of that trade and is irrelevant to the argument.Trading Russel was a terrible move
There is only one solution: tank the season.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Let this scrub go Spurs
Forbes is a yes man. Exactly the kind of player pop wants.
Just to mix in some positive vibes with all the wrist-cutting.
I think Salinas has it right if Bertans, Belinelli & Forbes are all 1+1 deals. It means those 3 plus Gay, Green & Gasol are potentially off the books next season, opening up a fair bit of capspace.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions