Reply With Quote
I was paraphrasing you, genius.
Should join your friend for a Jack Daniels cin whiskey."I mean my friend wants to know about which cinnamon whiskey I should be drinking."
I was paraphrasing you, genius.
You and Chumplov could wear these matching shirts for your cin whiskey initiation:
Altho with your fake persona, something tells me you have slurped cinnamon whiskey before.
He didn't voluntarily testify he was subpoenaed you dip . And lol at you thinking this went well for Strzok.
Forget the re ed shillary s in here defending this POS
But today saw countless of democrat congressppl defending this guy and changing the subject to Putin and russia collusion
This is very disturbing indeed
I will seriously think about moving to Oceania for a few years as this is becoming officially a hole
so just tweets or did you watch the 1 hr and 47 mins of his testimony? i'd bet you don't watch but clips on twitter. the schwartz is strong with you!
like **** face sheila jackson and her russia this and border kids that? lmao that **** and the rest of them losers!
Did you watch the whole thing?
I didn't.
Fabbs, you're the one who was asking for recommendations for cinnamon whiskey.You and Chumplov could wear these matching shirts for your cin whiskey initiation:
Altho with your fake persona, something tells me you have slurped cinnamon whiskey before.
You.
You can't pin that on anyone else.
not yet... woke up at 9am to watch most and fell asleep half way through but am about to put it on the screen rn. i watch most so here's to trying to look like a bad ass pavTHETIC.
btw, trying to make this about me when dip djohn is nothing more than a twitter sharing keyboard warrior. lol
no. the closed door session was under supboena. the public session was voluntary. they were arguing back and forth about it during the hearing... i think thats how it ultimately resolved. not 100% sure but that was my understanding
Last edited by spurraider21; 07-12-2018 at 03:33 PM.
You're trying to make it about djohn for some reason.not yet... woke up at 9am to watch most and fell asleep half way through but am about to put it on the screen rn. i watch most so here's to trying to look like a bad ass pavTHETIC.
btw, trying to make this about me when dip djohn is nothing more than a twitter sharing keyboard warrior. lol
lol
Gorilla TV isn’t available there.
Better they have Tasmanian Devil tv
You should see those s try to anihilate each other
i am because it is about him and most of yall that just share articles ad nauseam and twitter posts but have no clue what yall are posting. by posting the bs yall think yall are one upping the other side.
i damn well know djohn isn't some intellectual who can even comprehend what's going on politically and especially not in the case of strzok. i might not be either but at least i watch full testimonies before i say a thing or post about it.
i have yet to put my 2 cents in on strzok's testimony today but somehow you think i have just by simply pointing out how ing re ed djohn is.
No, I think you made it all about djohn because you have a personal beef with him.
I predict that even if you watch the entire testimony and read the transcript, your conclusion will be Strzok bad and some nebulous conspiracy talk upon which you won't elaborate.
I'm pretty sure both were under subpoena.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/03/polit...ena/index.html
from that article
Strzok was interviewed last week for 11 hours, in both unclassified and classified settings, after House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte initially slapped him with a subpoena to testify last month, although the two sides ultimately agreed to a voluntary interview and the subpoena was withdrawn.
"Special Agent Strzok requested that the initial hearing be public and, one way or another, he will testify publicly soon," said Aitan Goelman, Strzok's attorney, in a statement to CNN on Tuesday. "Pete wants the American people to hear his testimony for themselves, instead of having his words leaked, twisted and mischaracterized by members of Congress. The only question is when and before what Committee, and those details are not yet settled."
i can claim strzok is bad rn! dude and his butt ing ugly ass mistress lisa page, who didn't show yesterday after being subpoenaed, traded thousands of texts against a presidential candidate/sitting president. that is truth and with that said he is bad and so is page. they're both corrupt to their cores. try and spin it pavTHETIC.
with that said i am gonna watch the testimony now. later gator.
btw, of course this is about djohn because it's djohn's thread idiot.
lol so emotional
See? My prediction already came true.
your prediction huh? of my thoughts on strzok as a corrupt pos or his testimony i have yet to see in full and have yet to comment on? which is it re ?
They're going to be the same.
Didn't Republicans want transparency in this investigation?
Strzok didn't let the witch-hunters, grandstanders, deflectors bulldoze him
He came prepared and unloaded on them.
GOP is so ed up. 'em all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
