Reply With Quote
Helped orchestrate a bogus investigation into the President elect and eventual President.
Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?
That’s quite the claim if that’s indeed what he is claiming. IG Horowitz could not even say with confidence that Strzok’s bias didn’t bleed into his investigative decisions concerning the opening of the Russia investigation. Horowitz hasn’t even released the findings on that so I’m curious as to how Pavlov came to that conclusion.
Helped orchestrate a bogus investigation into the President elect and eventual President.
Are you claiming his bias did not impact the Russia investigation yes or no?
Great, list all your evidence that Strzok’s bias did affect investigations.
I'm waiting.
"bleed into investigative decisions"
You can have an opinion before the conclusion you dumb .
It's like anything else in life, take basketball, we up 40 with 2 mins to go. Yes the game isn't over but everything is pointing in that direction.
You can come to the conclusion that he didn't do anything wrong and there is no evidence of bias in his work, or else it would have come up in the hearing.
Who was above him in the Russia investigation?
Any investigation.
Any investigation.
Any investigation.
Any investigation.
Any investigation.
Moron.
Horowitz words not mine.
TSA ignoring the search warrants signed by judges and the indictments returned by Grand Juries.
I'm gonna leave the poor fella alone. Clearly he has zero reasoning skills.
Nope. It wuz all Bleedin' Pete!
How did you come to that conclusion when the man with all the evidence can’t even come to that conclusion?
Can't forget Carter Page blabbering like a ing idiot about his connections with the Kremlin.
Manafort still using burner phones.
They don't still have that evidence - Hillary deleted 33k of her emails, laptops and cel phones have been smashed, computers have been bleach-bitted.
Because he has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.
That's how these things work, TSA.
You cling to your innuendo as long as humanly possible. I get that. You want to avoid a repeat of your past humiliations as much as possible -- but you have to prove your claims at some point.
You haven't.
She destroyed evidence and she walking free now. OMG the same talking points that go nowhere.
How many of those indictments have to do with the Trump colluding with Russians theory you’ve pushed for over a year?
Read the post more carefully next time.
Ask Guccifer.
Since Stone and the oFLA dip are mentioned in the indictments, I'd say the investigation is getting closer to Trump and the GOP rather than farther.
The Justice Department's internal watchdog indicated Tuesday that he's examining whether a senior FBI agent’s political bias infected the bureau's decision to open an investigation into the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia.
"That’s a matter we’ve got under review and are looking at right now," Inspector General Michael Horowitz told lawmakers at a hearing on Capitol Hill.”
“Given Strzok’s strong opinions, Horowitz said, he couldn't conclude with confidence that Strzok's personal views didn't bleed into his investigative decisions.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...respond-653544
That wasn’t an answer to the question try again or next time don’t bother quoting my question if you aren’t going to answer it.
And?
He has to come to the conclusion that his bias did affect these investigations.
I'm not commenting on whether TSA is correct in his assertions. I'm saying that whatever existed to put Hillary in prison has long since been destroyed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions