lol Chris
I'm sure several versions existed for that CNN exclusive interview in a cave. You still believe CNN was able to find Osama after our intelligence agencies could not? You're a sucker.
lol Chris
lol triggered
You just complained about this site yourself, dumbass.
lol Chris
lol triggered
I can't argue against your phantom arguments. Explain how Hillary was right to sign-off on the deal to supply Putin with uranium. If you're so sure of yourself, this shouldn't be a problem.
Also,at your 'lil tantrum cos you white flagged it.
He's throwing a huge tantrum.Currently, his argument for Uranium One wasn't bad is I know something you don't know.
![]()
You still haven't explained how the Uranium One deal worked.
All you've done is thrown tantrum after tantrum.
Go ahead and explain how it worked.
He pulled the same in the Uranium One thread. He will eventually ask for something that is either classified or doesn't exist and claim victory when you can't cite it.
So, your losing strategy is to assign mundane tasks?![]()
Btw how u homeboys dont use Onionbrowser on TOR is beyond me
Have you guys not seen Snowden?
It's all public record.
You guys just never bothered to learn anything about it. You just want the fake news.
You can't explain the Uranium One deal.
Period.
lol
If chump had something that exonerated his hag, he'd say it. He knows that Shillary was in bed with Putin, though. True patriot is okay with her treason.![]()
Feel free to explain the Uranium One deal in your own words, Chris.
lol
Okay, if you're the expert then tell us how Hillary is not at fault / how she was okay to do the deal with Putin.
I've already said the part that "exonerates" Clinton and every other en y that approved that deal.
lol derp
Dn't know wut da fuq dat is, tbh.
Putin does not get our uranium.
The I-already-said-it card.
![]()
And I just said it again.
lol derp
Expound. Not enough.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)