I agree.
with that, i don't think you could base an opinion about whether or not trump looked weak(and to who exactly) based on your hero's in the MSM without watching the presser in full. last, both of us aren't skilled enough to interpret body language so you can hang it up already.
with that, i don't think you could base an opinion about whether or not trump looked weak(and to who exactly) based on your hero's in the MSM without watching the presser in full.you're not even trying to hide your intellectual dishonesty tbh
I didn't base it on the MSM coverage of it. I seent enough of it with my own eyes.
with that, i don't think you could base an opinion about whether or not trump looked weak(and to who exactly) based on your hero's in the MSM without watching the presser in full.
I first asked you on Monday
dishonesty is reading vault 7, what tools are included, but what? or is it forming an opinion about how someone looks "weak" by watching 5 secs of film when the presser was much much longer than that?
you just look like the fluffer you are SR.
you based it on what exactly then, a 5 sec clip of which the MSM has been replaying nonstop? give me a break.
Another dodge.
Just say you have nothing.
^ the ol' i won bs...
now... Just say you have nothing pavTHETIC.
Several minutes tbh.
His surrender was unprecedented in US history as is his consideration of Putin's request to interrogate a former US ambassador for his conspiracy theory.
Vault 7 is nothing like any of that. You can't find any precedent for Trump's actions because there is none.
I didn't say I won.
I said he has nothing.
Neither do you.
You are both free to prove me wrong.
But you won't.
Let me know the all the other times a US president publicly took the side of a hostile government over his own law enforcement and intelligence services in the presence of the leader of that hostile government.
Also let me know all the other times a US president entertained the idea of having a former ambassador interrogated by a dictator's investigators.
Make a list.
Yeah when you selectively edit different posts I can see how you would think that.
Democrats just keep telling themselves
you got it all wrong... what's unprecedented is a US Pres Elect/Pres being spied on by our own intel comm's during and after his campaign. what aren't you understanding exactly?
how is he supposed to fully trust our intel comm's when most of the USA doesn't trust them? our intel comm's!
Sorry, the guys Trump appointed are saying the Russians are responsible.
Are they in on your deep state conspiracy?
Explain their actions.
i believe they are or maybe it's yet to be seen... comey was part of this admin at the beginning and was ousted because he's a sucking full of lying piece of garbage and i hope the same will be done with those still in and those appointed who step out of line.
Yeah when you selectively edit different posts I can see how you would think that.
Democrats just keep telling themselves
Yeah, he definitely ed up. Only thing helping him out is the insane reactions of his political enemies, e.g. Brennan.
poor poor pos muslim toad looking commie brennan.
That makes absolutely no sense. There is no reason for Trump's appointees to lie about Russia's being involved.
How is that helping him out? Brennan was one of the people who briefed him with the classified intel and texts and whatever.
Frankly, I'd be worried if I was Trump. Brennan knows everything.
But yeah sure, that's helping Trump.
there's no reason for your best friend to raw dog your ol' lady either but just ask assBlake how that's working out for him. there's always 2 sides to every coin.
just as a beta would do you stick up for commie face brennan.How is that helping him out? Brennan was one of the people who briefed him with the classified intel and texts and whatever.
Frankly, I'd be worried if I was Trump. Brennan knows everything.
But yeah sure, that's helping Trump.
Don't try to change the subject. There is no logical reason for Trump's appointees to lie about Russia's being responsible.
Just go with Wray and Coates. No reason at all for them to lie.
you just never know to be exact and neither do i. that's the beauty here... i don't know so i'm not stating facts like someone who doesn't watch pressers or testimony from the hill.
You just said they are in on the conspiracy and you didn't watch the full interview of neither Coats nor Wray.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
