A chumpette bean counting. Par.
How is that helping him out? Brennan was one of the people who briefed him with the classified intel and texts and whatever.
Frankly, I'd be worried if I was Trump. Brennan knows everything.
But yeah sure, that's helping Trump.liberal gods
Brennan knows everything but Russians don't know what's going on in their own country
nah, i said there's a potential there that they are in on the conspiracy. you claim i say they are in on the conspiracy. see how twisting words isn't wise?
and of which particular hill testimony do you speak of? here's your list now name which ones.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony
Which is it? Speak up.
I'm talking about this week's interviews where they repeat their beliefs.
i don't think it's fact that wray and coats are in on anything but it is my belief that they are. my opinion only and not fact. get it now pavTHETIC?
Great.
Why do you think Trump's appointees are in on the conspiracy?
either or what's it have to do with me? i am not stating facts about either like you are of trump or strzok.
You're okay in my book koriwhat
it's not just his appointees and if i have to keep restating my stance to you about not trusting any man then why the are we even going back and forth for in the first place? you never want to take my answers at face value but want me to repeat myself over and over again. learn to digest what you read and move on.
I stated my opinion of Trump's actions.
depends what book that might be...
Let's keep it simple because conspiracy theories often spin out of control under questioning.
Christopher Wray
Dan Coats
Both Trump appointees.
Both reaffirm their belief that Russia is responsible for the election hacks.
You believe both Trump appointees are part of a conspiracy against Trump.
Why do you believe those two are part of a conspiracy against Trump?
And this "not trusting any man" business is a cop out. You obviously trust Trump and think Wray and Coats are conspiring against him.
i can accept that i suppose. but to claim he looks weak in that presser to me means you watched the whole thing. i guess as well i can look back up in your replies and associate it all with a mere few mins you watched so the statement should be; "he looked weak for the 3 mins i actually saw and not based on the full presser."
Faulty premise again.
He looked incredibly weak when asked the most important question regarding US/Russia relations.
You are free to tell me how you think he looked strong when answering that question.
i believe no man is to be trusted. until they prove me wrong i hold firm that i don't trust them. i'm very weary of anyone in government especially those in the intel 3 letter agencies.
You don't know what a premise is.
That's a cop out.
According to you every man on earth is in on your conspiracy against Trump.
Except Trump.
Whom you trust implicitly.
This is stupid.
it took balls to say our intel comm's. at least to me it did. i'd do the same if i was in his position considering how they have been spying on him for god knows how long and covering for hrc and her cronies. hey, maybe he trusts coats and wray but the rest. the rest were there prior to this admin and i'm sure as ain't trusting them!
you got that wrong. this isn't a trump thing at all. my opinion is the fact that i trust no man. not that trump doesn't.
But Trump said the exact opposite the next day.
I saw that entire news conference.
What is your explanation for his flip-flop?
You trust Trump.
idgaf what trump says. whether he's a goofball on twitter, during a presser, or after when he is back in the USA having to have another presser.
i have no explanation for his actions because i am not djt. you'll have to ask him.
i trust no man. again having to state the same thing over and over again because you refuse to accept it.
Now enjoy getting shat on. Your premise is that if Trump appoints someone then they're surely gonna have allegiance to him. Obviously, that's bush league thinking.
I'm just kidding. I think you're a re ed assholedepends what book that might be...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote