I haven't heard from them in over a year.
He thinks VIPS is an anonymous blog
Have they published anything about the latest indictments?
Listen up buddy because I'm only going to tell you this one time. You've got problems. I am genuinely sorry for triggering you in to making a troll account. I hope you find a life partner that wants to indulge your -erotic fantasies. I am praying for you. Go ahead and retire your account and we can pretend like this never happened.
Is that a no on the bread pudding?
BADASS
We reproduce below one of our most recent [June 7, 2018] articles on “Russia-Gate,” which, in turn, draws from our Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity Memorandum to you of July 24, 2017.
lol
my main clientele is military. i run my own biz and at times it's slow which is the case usually around this time anyhow. again, i contribute(higher taxes than you considering i run my own biz) and do deal with military vets monthly. you?
how am i propping myself up exactly? and what lies am i telling?
you're just mad because i don't give a about you nor many others here and i think yall are a bunch of sissy ing beta es who think they're so cool here but not in real life. yall are the ing losers no one wanted to hang out with in school let alone outside of school. bunch of sissy s yall are bonerChamp.
He thinks VIPS is an anonymous blogtoday's Pavlov
lol they said absolutely nothing about the indictments.
lol VIPS
lol hater
lol Chris
What you posted on the OP was:
At this point, all that is clearly known after more than a year of huffing and puffing is that last summer files and emails pertaining to the election were copied and then made their way to WikiLeaks, which published some of them at a time that was damaging to the Clinton campaign. Those who are blaming Russia believe that there was a hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) server and also of John Podesta’s emails that was carried out by a Russian surrogate or directly by Moscow’s military intelligence arm. They base their conclusion on a statement issued by the Department of Homeland Security on October 7, 2016, and on a longer assessment prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on January 6.
Both government appraisals implied that there was a U.S. government intelligence agency consensus that there was a Russian hack, though they provided little in the way of actual evidence that that was the case and, in particular, failed to demonstrate how the information was obtained and what the chain of custody was as it moved from that point to the office of WikiLeaks. The January report was particularly criticized as unconvincing, rightly so, because the most important one of its three key contributors, the National Security Agency, had only moderate confidence in its conclusions, suggesting that whatever evidence existed was far from solid.
That's factually incorrect at this point, in light of the evidence in the indictment. So in that sense, the article in the OP has been basically debunked by facts.
Old news. Indictment spells out who the Guccifer 2 'persona' is, who were behind the keyboard, and they were not found out due to VPN switching, but because a number of reasons (forgot to log off of a shortening url service used in the podesta spearfishing, traceable bitcoin to pay for Arizona C&C server, used Russian malware at DCC, etc).
^ Another poster that didn't read the indictment.
The Guccifer 2 persona went to great lengths to make sure he was attributed to Russia. The Guccifer 2.0 persona never made sense in any of this, imho. “Hey guys. Here I am. I’m not Russian. (wink wink)”
No. you were responding to me when I was talking about Hillary email hack/leak
You even quoted me on it on your post
The OP was quoted from an older article from the Atlantic which because its dated moght have some old news. Still a good article
As I said. I read the indictment and it does not proove or offer any evidence that Hillarys emails were stolen by Russian state much less that there was any collusion with Trump campaign
He actually did go through great lengths to pretend he was a lone hacker from Romania...
In retrospect, knowing what we know now, it's pretty clear Putin, Assange really had a sore butthurt over Shillary becoming president (and whether that was rightly so it's certainly debatable). Again, that doesn't mean that what they've done actually derailed the election.
This is what I quoted and was responding to:
Not saying Russia did not hack it but there is not enough solid evidence
The entire paragraph:
Not saying Russia did not hack it but there is not enough solid evidence
Also the fact that FBI never really treated as criminal investigation raises lots of flags
For example when supposedly North Korea hacked Sony Pictures, they treated it as a criminal onvestigation and requested and got access to all of Sonys servers
Not a single mention of Hillary emails, that's why I attributed the quote to what you posted in the OP.
So, yeah, as far as the DCC/Podesta hacks are concerned, there's solid evidence, now, that it was from a Russian GRU unit.
He said he was Romanian and made sure Russian metadata breadcrumbs were left behind. The whole thing is bizarre, frankly.
The metadata on the indictment, at least, appears to be from NSA-style data collection or bugged computers. There's no way they could know "10 minutes before creating the webpage, they searched for XXX, YYY, ZZZ from a Russian IP"... that's pretty spot on.
Then again, that's what you kinda expect in this type of counterintel investigations.
Obviously, anybody can believe whatever they want.
I do think it's pretty lazy to continue pushing ter conspira s when you actually do have an actual legal do ent dispelling the myth (ie: C&C server was in Arizona, there's your answer for transfer speeds).
But, you know, some people have a bone to pick.
honest Q. i'm not tech savvy enough to understand much... but how does that answer the transfer speed q
That legal do ent will never be challenged in a public court.
Yeah hack “it”
“It” being the Hillary emails
You could argue that certain speeds are not attainable going outside the US, but within the US, especially if you're at the end of a backbone, there's no reason you couldn't hit up to 10Gbit peaks.
This server was actually a co-location in Arizona, which means that it was likely at the end of a backbone, and so the theory you couldn't hit those speeds is, well, a myth.
i'll pretend i know what a backbone is and say thanks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote