You obviously don’t know how sketchy the dossier is.
Explain to me the Woods procedures.
You obviously don’t know how sketchy the dossier is.
And based on Russian hearsay.![]()
You don't know how sketchy your theory is. You provide no proof.
Heresay is now indictments.
Too bad Darrin. 4 judges found probable cause and there is nothing you can do about it.
not sure why you think so, but if true, that's a matter for OPR.
if DOJ failed to follow it's own guidelines, presumably someone in the Trump Administration could request a review.
And he won't. Says something right there about his theory.
how did the FBI fool four FISA judges?
FISA application doesn’t explicitly say it was DNC oppo research.
No telling exactly since their reasoning for accepting the Steele information is largely redacted.
I predicted you would be kicking the can into the redacted parts.
I was right.
Hard whiff
And it never would according to the masking rules Nunes fought for.
It was listed by the FBI as possible bias. Quit whining. Your theory ded.
I predict redacted parts are even more embarrassing info, but we’ll find out eventually (hopefully).
not sure why you would think that. it's extraordinary that we got even a peek.
True. I was very surprised that this was released.
Yeah you can't even wipe your own ass.
Strong take
You never provide one
just look how well this one is working:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-...ort-1532293201
I'm laughing actually. No probable cause changes.
Resis s cant even admit genesis of #muhRussiaCollusionGateon very sketchy grounds. This charade will end eventually.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)