hiding behind tweets tends to confirm his temerity
Chris only cares about his conspiracy fantasy he's too afraid to post here.
hiding behind tweets tends to confirm his temerity
Aw, isums fee fees hurt?
Jesus, dude keep up. Russia meddling is a hoax now. Again.
![]()
TSA's anonymous heroes scrambling as bad as TSA himself.
and back to the post above... as if the judge on the spot would allow a swap of immunity deals without making any reference to the last minute change
and judge ellis was the one who was scolding mueller's team early may so you can't now pivot and pretend he's in on the conpsiracy
"highly respected judge"
"judge ellis who is reall something very special i hear from many standpoints"
According to @DeepStateKilla1776, Judge Ellis was just throwing off the scent with his early criticisms.
Still waiting for Pavlov to list all of the Nunes memo lies.
Can kicked.
Nunes fought to keep the names of non-target people and organizations in FISA applications masked.
That's the big lie.
Do you understand that?
Yes or no.
The fact you keep bringing this up after being told over and over again that masking is standard practice makes you as dishonest as Nunes.
Just like you can't face how wrong you were here:
lol TSA
So there are no lies you can point out in the actual Nunes memo?
“Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele's efforts.”
Did the FBI mention the DNC, the Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign that funded Steele’s efforts yes or no?
No.
What would be the significance of mentioning the DNC, the Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign that funded Steele's efforts?
Question pending.
Actually more than one.
Nunes fought to keep the names of non-target people and organizations in FISA applications masked.
That's the big lie.
Do you understand that?
Yes or no.
Seriously?
Explain how that’s a lie. And then answer the question.
So there are no lies you can point out in the actual Nunes memo?
Question pending, but I'll answer.
Seriously.
Now, in your own words, what would be the significance of mentioning the DNC, the Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign that funded Steele's efforts?
Yes, seriously.
You really need to flesh out your conspiracy theory because it makes no sense whatsoever.
Your contention is that Republican FISA judges are too stupid to see the potential for bias given the information they had and that the non-target parties needed to be extraordinarily unmasked because you don't like Hillary Clinton.
TSA, etc tactic is that if Dems funded Steele, then ALL of his findings, esp the ones that have been verified by FBI, etc, are illegit.
I'm sure Pootin can verify the pee-pee episode
here DarrinS i have some low hanging fruit for you. its been too long since you made a peepee comment
There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)