Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

Yes, seriously.

You really need to flesh out your conspiracy theory because it makes no sense whatsoever.

Your contention is that Republican FISA judges are too stupid to see the potential for bias given the information they had and that the non-target parties needed to be extraordinarily unmasked because you don't like Hillary Clinton.

Who said they need to be extraordinarily unmasked? Referring to Clinton as candidate #2 and her campaign as campaign #2 would have been sufficient. It’s the same way they referred to Trump and his campaign. Why obfuscate other than to hide who funded it?

[Pavlov]

Explain how that’s a lie.

I already did.

Twice.

You're simply dishonest, TSA.

[TSA]

I already did.

Twice.

You're simply dishonest, TSA.

Then you haven’t explained it well. What did Nunes lie about? And what in the Nunes memo was a lie?

[Pavlov]

Who said they need to be extraordinarily unmasked? Referring to Clinton as candidate #2 and her campaign as campaign #2 would have been sufficient. It’s the same way they referred to Trump and his campaign. Why obfuscate other than to hide who funded it?

There was no obfuscation. You think this is the most important part of the application and that it never would've been approved had the Republican judges you think were so stupid as to be fooled by this.

Take a step back and understand just how ridiculous this is.

[TSA]

Question pending, but I'll answer.

Seriously.


Now, in your own words, what would be the significance of mentioning the DNC, the Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign that funded Steele's efforts?

I don’t believe a FISC judge would sign off on the warrant had they known a significant portion of the evidence provided in the application was unverified dirt paid for by the opposing campaign.

[Pavlov]

Then you haven’t explained it well.

I can explain things you you.

I can't understand things for you.

You think it's a conspiracy.

You believe in multiple conspiracy theories for no other reason than they confirm your political bias. There is no logical reason for you to be adopt all the conspiracy theories you have adopted here.

[TSA]

There was no obfuscation. You think this is the most important part of the application and that it never would've been approved had the Republican judges you think were so stupid as to be fooled by this.

Take a step back and understand just how ridiculous this is.

Of course there was obfuscation. The FBI knew who funded it and hid that from the court.

[Pavlov]

I don’t believe a FISC judge would sign off on the warrant had they known a significant portion of the evidence provided in the application was unverified dirt paid for by the opposing campaign.

Well, what evidence did they actually use?

[TSA]

I can explain things you you.

I can't understand things for you.

You think it's a conspiracy.

You believe in multiple conspiracy theories for no other reason than they confirm your political bias. There is no logical reason for you to be adopt all the conspiracy theories you have adopted here.

Why the constant dodging? Explain how Nunes lies and then point out the lies in the Nunes memo. Your claims, back them up.

[Pavlov]

Of course there was obfuscation. The FBI knew who funded it and hid that from the court.

To prove that, you would have to produce other FISA warrants where such information was provided as relevant and necessary.

[spurraider21]

I don’t believe a FISC judge would sign off on the warrant had they known a significant portion of the evidence provided in the application was unverified dirt paid for by the opposing campaign.

So you're saying it's important for the FISA judge to have known that the information from Steele was political opposition research meant to discredit Trump's campaign?

[Pavlov]

Why the constant dodging? Explain how Nunes lies and then point out the lies in the Nunes memo. Your claims, back them up.

I already did.

You said you didn't understand.

I accept that.

[TSA]

So you're saying it's important for the FISA judge to have known that the unverified information from Steele was political opposition research paid for by the opposing campaign meant to discredit Trump's campaign?

FIFY

[TSA]

I already did.

You said you didn't understand.

I accept that.

I’ll accept you not clarifying your position. Moving on.

What were all the lies in the Nunes memo?

[TSA]

To prove that, you would have to produce other FISA warrants where such information was provided as relevant and necessary.

Was the FBI straightforward with the court on who funded the dossier yes or no?

[Pavlov]

I’ll accept you not clarifying your position. Moving on.

What were all the lies in the Nunes memo?

I already said where. You didn't understand.

Moving on.

[Pavlov]

Was the FBI straightforward with the court on who funded the dossier yes or no?

So you're saying you have no such evidence to prove it was hidden.

I accept your complete lack of evidence.

And seriously -- you won't even say what dossier information was used.

You flat out refuse to discuss it.

You can't be serious about any of this if you can't even say how it was used.

[TSA]

So you're saying you have no such evidence to prove it was hidden.

I accept your complete lack of evidence.

And seriously -- you won't even say what dossier information was used.

You flat out refuse to discuss it.

You can't be serious about any of this if you can't even say how it was used.

Was the court ever told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Was the court ever told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier yes or no?

No.

Moving on.

What information from the dossier was used?

[TSA]

I already said where. You didn't understand.

Moving on.

so you’ve got no lies from the Nunes memo. I’ll accept your white flag pussy.

[Pavlov]

so you’ve got no lies from the Nunes memo. I’ll accept your white flag pussy.

I already said where.

You said you didn't understand.

I accepted your lack of understanding.

Moving on.

What information from the dossier was used?

[TSA]

So you're saying you have no such evidence to prove it was hidden.

Was the court ever told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier yes or no?

No.

[Pavlov]

You already admitted you have no evidence proving it would normally be included in a FISA application.

TSA

Question pending.

[TSA]

I already said where.

You said you didn't understand.

I accepted your lack of understanding.

Moving on.

What information from the dossier was used?

No. You never stated where in the Numes memo were the lies. Try again. Where were the lies?

[spurraider21]

Was the court ever told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier yes or no?

No.

What would be the significance of the court being told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier?