You are admitting the FBI was not straightforward with the court.You already admitted you have no evidence proving it would normally be included in a FISA application.
TSA
Question pending.
I already explained to you.
You said you didn't understand.
You want to pretend such a disclosure would be necessary and standard on a FISA application.
You admitted you have no evidence it would be necessary and required.
Moving on.
What information from the dossier was used?
I admitted the information you demanded was not there.You are admitting the FBI was not straightforward with the court.
What information from the dossier was used?
If it was insignificant the FBI would not have hesitated to include it in the application.
List the lies from the Nunes memo one by one. I’ll wait.
You're saying it's the FBI's goal to include as much insignificant information as possible in a FISA warrant.
a) That doesn't answer my question. So I'll re-ask: What would be the significance of the court being told candidate #2/campaign #2 funded the dossier?
b) You are saying the FBI would have included it if it was insignificant? lol. That makes no sense. Should they also include their favorite color since it's insignificant?
But don't answer part b. That was rhetorical. I just want you to tell me what the significance would be.
Still waiting.
Using an opposing campaign’s opposition research to obtain a FISA warrant would be significant. Do you not think the court would want to know that?
The conspiracy theory about the FBI withholding the Steele Dossier's funding source requires the following two beliefs:
1. Funding sources dictate the results of research
2. The FBI thought they could hide the funding source forever
I told you. You don't want to accept it and you don't even know what information from the dossier was used.
You can't even admit that Podesta wasn't on of the five people pardoned.
So the court would then know it was political opposition research meant to discredit Trump!
Oh, they already knew that.
1. They most definitely do.
2. The top 3 from the FBI are gone and all under investigation for the FISA application.
Did the court know who funded it?
I can admit Podesta wasn’t one of the five granted immunity.I told you. You don't want to accept it and you don't even know what information from the dossier was used.
You can't even admit that Podesta wasn't on of the five people pardoned.
Can you list all the lies in the Nunes memo?
No.
What would that change, TSA?
A day later and after making excuses.
I don’t think they would have approved the warrant.
You’re on day 2 of refusing to list all the lies in the Nunes memo.
I know you believe this. I'm just pointing out what you have to believe to buy into this.
And you're wrong. No research company who wants to continue getting projects is going to invent results to please a client. Why would you hire a company you expect will return bull ?
Are you trying to suggest Comey, McCabe and Strozk were fired over the FISA application?2. The top 3 from the FBI are gone and all under investigation for the FISA application.
As for the investigation, consider the investigators.
The lie was pretending all the names and payment amounts should have been included in the application. There was nothing about masking those in the memo.
Multiple names and figures. Multiple lies.
Listed.
Moving on.
What parts of the dossier were used in the FISA application?
Nunes quickly finding himself on an island.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote