Reply With Quote
Can't blame him for being flustered tbh. All his good sources are about to lose their security clearance.
Can't blame him for being flustered tbh. All his good sources are about to lose their security clearance.
Dunno. It could be over for all I know. Could be going on right this second. Depends on what they got from the warrant. Looks like a lot from all the pages of findings.
And? I just said they might not have enough evidence to prosecute.The FBI told the FISA court that Page "has been collaborating and conspiring with the Russian government"
Don't need to. I've learned your non-answers confirm my su ions more often than not. If Q had predicted any of it, you'd have told me by now.no need to lie about reading every Q post
What's the writing on the wall, then?
Make yourself clear.
The Russian collusion narrative is crumbling. Only an autist wouldn’t be able to figure that out on their own.
You've been saying that for a year, so nothing new from you.
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Reveals the White House's
Bizarre Machinations Concealing Putin's Admission that He Favors Trump
Why would they be trying to hide this?
a reporter asked the Russian president if he had wanted Trump to win the 2016 election.
For the first time, Putin admitted that he did.
But according to the White House's official records, that didn't happen,
Other outlets have noted that in the White House's transcript of the press conference,
the reporter's question about whether Putin had wanted Trump to win was su iously left out.
And even after news outlets picked up the story, the transcript wasn't corrected.
In the White House's official recording of the conference, the questions itself appears to have been edited out of the video entirely.
"They just dropped it out," she said.
"The first part of his question: 'President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election?'
They just dropped it out."
She reports, as well, that the Russian transcripts edited out the question entirely.
Independent video and transcripts of the press conference exist, and
that exchange itself was widely reported and discussed.
Minor tweaks to the official records won't change that fact.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...cealing-putins
Why is Trash hiding something "Pootin / Russian" from the official WH video that the entire world saw, do ente, discussed?
Who does he think he is fooling?
And the Russians hide it also?collusion!
Yep, here's the original reporting on this:MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Reveals the White House's
Bizarre Machinations Concealing Putin's Admission that He Favors Trump
Why would they be trying to hide this?
a reporter asked the Russian president if he had wanted Trump to win the 2016 election.
For the first time, Putin admitted that he did.
But according to the White House's official records, that didn't happen,
Other outlets have noted that in the White House's transcript of the press conference,
the reporter's question about whether Putin had wanted Trump to win was su iously left out.
And even after news outlets picked up the story, the transcript wasn't corrected.
In the White House's official recording of the conference, the questions itself appears to have been edited out of the video entirely.
"They just dropped it out," she said.
"The first part of his question: 'President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election?'
They just dropped it out."
She reports, as well, that the Russian transcripts edited out the question entirely.
Independent video and transcripts of the press conference exist, and
that exchange itself was widely reported and discussed.
Minor tweaks to the official records won't change that fact.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...cealing-putins
Why is Trash hiding something "Pootin / Russian" from the official WH video that the entire world saw, do ente, discussed?
Who does he think he is fooling?
And the Russians hide it also?
So what gives, Trump supporters?
Make your theories known.
not yet
Twitter by Trial... HMS..
Why Russian spies really like American universities
Maria Butina may be only the latest in a long line of Russian agents to go undercover on U.S. campuses
Under the alias Cynthia Murphy, Russian spy Lydia Guryeva attended Columbia Business School, and ingratiated herself with a key fundraiser for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. Guryeva’s instructions from Moscow, according to a 2010 FBI complaint, were to “strengthen…ties w. classmates on daily basis incl. professors who can help in job search and who will have (or already have) access to secret info” and to report “on their detailed personal data and character traits w. preliminary conclusions about their potential (vulnerability) to be recruited by Service.”
If the charges against Butina are accurate, she’s only the latest in a long line of Russian agents to infiltrate U.S. universities.
Dating back to the Soviet era, Russian spies have sought to take advantage of academia's lax security, collaborative, global culture, and revolving door with government.
Russian intelligence understands that today’s professor of international relations may be tomorrow’s assistant secretary of state, and vice versa.
Although cyber-spying and hacking offer opportunities to glean secrets at less personal risk, the traditional strategies of human espionage persist, and sending a spy to school is prominent among them.
Butina enrolled in American University’s School of International Service in the summer of 2016
She concentrated in cyber policy and became a research assistant at the university’s Kogod School of Business.
With research funding from the Kogod Cybersecurity Governance Center, she and two professors, Mark A. Clark and J. Alberto Espinosa, co-authored a March 2018 paper on “Cybersecurity Knowledge Networks.” (The paper is still on the center’s website.)
Clark and Espinosa declined comment.
The cybersecurity center was founded in 2015 to provide “guidance specifically to boards of directors, senior executives, and other leaders so that they can make informed decisions about cybersecurity.”
It has a partnership with defense contractor Raytheon Co., and was headed from June 2017 to March 2018 by a former lawyer for the National Security Agency.
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/25/14908971_partner/
Poll: More than half of Americans think Russia’s Vladimir Putin has dirt on President Donald Trump
However, an overwhelming majority of Republicans do not believe the Kremlin has “compromising information” on Trump
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/25/pol...-donald-trump/
Willful ignorance, blindness towards the blatant, criminal truth about the Repug team.
Go Team Go, Fight, Win!
No dumb conspiracy theory, YOU'RE the dumb conspiracy theory!!
Russia had a clear preference.
Russia meddled.
Why is it so implausible to you that a corrupt POS like Trump wouldn't know about it, and attempt to get help wherever he could?
Tell me again, what is Butina being charged with?
Describe her activities, in your own words.
Because, as we all know, someone who actually was a spy would readily admit his activities in a public interview. That's how we get them.
So according to the indictments, the DNC's "data analytics" were copied and stolen from their cloud based servicer.
In September of 2016.
In the very beginning of October, Trump announced a sudden shift in tactics/strategy.
Pence colluding OPENLY with Russians
Mike Pence turns to Sinclair for an embarrassingly friendly interview as Trump defends the media giant
Pence on corporation-friendly tax cuts:
“President Trump has been delivering on his promise: to cut taxes for working families”
Pence’s sit-down interview with Sinclair chief political analyst andformer Trump aide Boris Epshteyn
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2018/07/25/mike-pence-turns-sinclair-embarrassingly-friendly-interview-trump-defends-media-giant/220783?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_c ampaign=Feed%3A+MediaMattersForAmerica-CountyFair+%28Media+Matters+for+America+-+Blog%29
BE is yet another Russian connected to Trash and his mafiya.
Working as an agent for Russia while pushing Russian interests since Obama was in office.
She has nothing to do with your hopes and dreams of Trump/Russian election collusion.
Mueller isn’t even the one bringing charges
Are you accusing Stanley Fischer Fed vice chairman and Nathan Sheets Treasury undersecretary for international affairs of collusion since they met with Butina and Torshin?
Why is this Russian “spy” still a free man openly mocking the spy charges against him?Because, as we all know, someone who actually was a spy would readily admit his activities in a public interview. That's how we get them.
Experts Conclude That Russian Attack Won The Election For Trump
Outside experts have concluded that the Russian attack on the 2016 election did enough damage to swing 80,000 votes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, which put Trump in the White House.
In his latest column for The Washington Post, Max Boot wrote:
While the intelligence agencies are silent on the impact of Russia’s attack,The numbers are staggering.
outside experts who have examined the Kremlin campaign —
which included stealing and sharing Democratic Party emails, spreading propaganda online and hacking state voter rolls —
have concluded that it did affect an extremely close election decided by fewer than 80,000 votes in three states.
Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, writes in his recent book, “Messing with the Enemy,” that
“Russia absolutely influenced the U.S. presidential election,”
especially in Michigan and Wisconsin, where Trump’s winning margin was less than 1 percent in each state.
Russian pro-Trump/anti-Clinton propaganda reached 126 million people on Facebook alone,
which is roughly the same number as the number of votes cast for Clinton and Trump.
Russian bots reached 1.4 million Twitter users with their disinformation, and
39 states had their voting systems hacked
in what experts believed what a Russian effort to get data that they could use to target voters in their attack.
Trump is not a legitimate president
It is simple math.
Trump lost the popular vote but
won an election by 80,000 votes in three states.
The Russians micro-targeted voters in those states.
They only needed a small fraction of voters to fall for their efforts in order to be successful.
The numbers were in Putin’s favor.
He could fail 90% of the time, and still swing the election for Trump.
The conclusion is that Trump wouldn’t have won without the Russians.
Trump owes Putin big, which is why he is constantly kissing the ring of America’s biggest enemy.
Trump isn’t legit.
The majority of Americans felt it,
believed it, and
the numbers show that it is true.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07...iticus+USA+%29
Then add in Pootin/Assange sabotaging Hillary's campaign in the final months by dribbling out weekly from the Pootin-stolen Dem data.
Not really a description. As I would say to my kids, "watch what is NOT being said, people attempting to mislead you will often leave important bits out, that is what you should pay attention to"Tell me again, what is Butina being charged with?
Describe her activities, in your own words.
In this case, I know you attempt to mislead for whatever reason you have, so I have to ask then,
How specifically was she "acting as an agent"? Provide details, if you are truly wanting to be honest.
My theory:
You are not honest.
Prediction, based on this theory
You will dodge, and deflect. You will mention Obama and Hillary, because you are incapable at this point of not doing so, because it is such an ingrained habit.
And to answer your question, no, I am not. Collusion takes more than just meeting someone, it takes exchanges of things like favors or money.
Such as:
Russian intelligence handing over Democratic party data analytics to the Trump campaign, and the Trump campaign using that in some way, by say, suddenly shifting focus or strategy.
TSA: prosecutors don't like to indict when they don't think they can convict.
contrary to popular usage, declining to prosecute isn't an exoneration
Are you saying that Carter Page’s media appearances to date have been wins for him?
.... rendering BigFinance effectively immune for committing highly complex financial crimes.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
