Reply With Quote
"I think the very first order of business would be moving the House to a contempt vote."
So there's no vote, Chris.
lol
Why do you want Trump's appointee impeached and tried anyway?
"I think the very first order of business would be moving the House to a contempt vote."
they have no idea, in their ideological fantasy swamp, how ing stupid they look.Damn. That was real time in here.
the bad part is that a minority of Americans are actually engaged in, follow politics
More goalpost moving from Chris.
Strzok will bring down the FBI...
Oh I meant McCabe.
Oh yeah nevermind. IT'S LISA PAIGEEEEEEE
I called Page a long time ago.
lol Reck using goalpost every time he gets rolled
He could've scheduled a vote today, Chris.
He didn't.
There is no vote, Chris.
lol
That's because you and TSA are the masters of it. Post it where you called it and I'll give you the credit.
Back in April
Back in AprilQ regurgitation
You're even more negative in that one post.Back in April
Why not say all of the above?Back in April
Dude named every top FBI person involved in the Mueller probe.
Not even your own words either. LOL
they have no idea, in their ideological fantasy swamp, how ing stupid they look.Damn. That was real time in here.
the bad part is that a minority of Americans are actually engaged in, follow politics
Chris posting that tweet is rich in vitamin I...
lol triggered by walls of tweets
Chris seems shook.
Back to beating the dead horse that is the [insert Obama did this] excuse.
lol walls of tweets nobody reads
A New Talking Point From the Pro-Trump Fringe
A new line of punditry is bubbling up among the president’s followers online:
It was a positive thing that the Russians hacked the 2016 election.
“If Trump & co. just pivoted to ‘Aren’t you glad Russia helped us defeat Hillary Clinton?’ would there be any serious blowback from his base?”
The question was rhetorical. The answers that began trickling in were not.
“No,” said Cassandra Fairbanks, a writer at the right-wing news and conspiracy website Gateway Pundit (and a former Sputnik employee). “I mean, I would be cool with it. Im already there. If russia was involved we should thank them.”
“No,” responded another self-identified Trump voter. “Hillary is a greater threat to our Republic.”
“If Russia assists MAGA Candidates on the internet in this year’s midterms, that’s not the end of the world.”
“I’ll try not to sound too awful, but I want to thank the Russians for interfering with our election to stop Hillary Clinton from becoming president. That woman has got illusions of grandeur.”
this new line of punditry bubbling up in the pro-Trump social-media conversation is worth taking seriously.
Trump has benefited enormously throughout his political rise from the efficiency with which
his supporters circulate talking points that
excuse his bad behavior,
or neutralize his latest scandal,
or explain away the discrepancies in his ever-shifting rhetoric.
the outlines of the pro-Russian-meddling argument emerging:
America interferes in other countries’ elections, so it can’t be that bad;
exposing Democrats’ hacked emails was a victory for transparency;
keeping Clinton out of office was so urgent and important that it warranted some foreign intervention.
Trump’s allies were forced to pivot repeatedly. They argued that
the president hadn’t broken any laws;
that any candidate in his position would have done the same thing;
that Clinton would have lost regardless of Russia’s interference,
so the whole point is moot.
the dangers of celebrating foreign interference in the American democratic process
—regardless of which party benefits—
should be self-evident.
But that’s a slippery slope some Trump supporters don’t seem afraid of tumbling down.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...russia/565592/
The oligarchy's dominance, Trash, Repugs and their blind cult are a clear sign that
America is ed and un able
Republicans Accuse Rosenstein of Secretly Plotting to Uphold Cons ution
WASHINGTON —House Republicans on Thursday accused the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, of “secretly and nefariously” implementing a plot to uphold the United States Cons ution.
In a joint press conference, Representatives Mark Meadows, of North Carolina, and Jim Jordan, of Ohio, said that
they had “ample evidence” that Rosenstein was prepared to protect the Cons ution “by any and all means at his disposal.”
“There is only one way to describe Rosenstein’s obsession with putting the Cons ution before all other concerns,” Meadows said. “Conflict of interest.”
“It is almost as if Rod Rosenstein had taken some kind of solemn oath to defend a centuries-old do ent,”
Jordan said. “This should make every American very, very scared.”
Though the Republicans have shelved their articles of impeachment against Rosenstein for now, they hope that their impeachment threat will send a clear message to Rosenstein that his reckless allegiance to the Cons ution will no longer be tolerated.
“If, going forward, Rosenstein uses his position at the Department of Justice to seek justice,
he will be crossing a red line,”
Meadows said.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republicans-accuse-rosenstein-of-secretly-plotting-to-uphold-cons ution
It’s always good when bat boutons starts taking over your thread.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)
Posting Permissions
