You copying cuck Blake's style.![]()
No, I just told you that you copied fabbs.
I didn't think you could get any more pathetic. You proved me wrong.
![]()
You copying cuck Blake's style.![]()
Actually TSA is more likely to bobo a reply. I'd much rather be accused of ripping off either compared to fabbs.
lol
Of course. You emulate cucks at the end of the day.![]()
You called TSA a cuck?
lol OK
You're trying to talk circles around the fact that you were posting at a cuck Blake level.![]()
same ol derp crutches
lol
I hope he'll be including this fabbs go-to move into his everyday repertoire
Oh, look. Your cuck mentor is supporting you, chump.![]()
Hair splitting. Julian Assange is the CEO and founder of Wikileaks.
What's preventing him from testifying now?
I'm actually encouraging you, derp
the tweet and you both fail to mention that Comey's attempt failed
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...-immunity-dealWaldman couldn’t believe a U.S. senator and the FBI chief were sending a different signal, so he went back to Laufman, who assured him the negotiations were still on. “What Laufman said to me after he heard I was told to ‘stand down’ by Warner and Comey was, ‘That’s bull . You are not standing down and neither am I,’” Waldman recalled.
But the source acknowledges that Warner consulted Comey and passed along the “stand down” instructions to Waldman: “That did happen.”
Multiple sources tell me the FBI’s counterintelligence team was aware and engaged in the Justice Department’s strategy but could not explain what motivated Comey to send a different message around the negotiations through Warner. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
While the negotiations survived the Warner-Comey intervention, the episode sowed distrust in Assange’s camp.
“The constructive, principled discussions with DOJ that occurred over nearly two months were complicated by the confusing ‘stand down’ message,” Waldman recalled.
Nothing stopping the Trump DOJ from giving him full immunity for nothing.
Cuck making stuff up.
And then.... Post November 8, 2016, FBI good now.![]()
That was sarcasm you dumb
No, you had more than one post like that that you were lashing out against the FBI for re-opening the investigation 10 days before the election. And you were using the words rigged and corrupt.
Nice try, chump lite.
lol derp doesn't understand anything despite his hours of late night research.
And no one is going to read any of them.
![]()
How many have you read, Chris?
the "corrupt, rigged" language was tongue in cheek
Lite, you put more than one post with the same language in a non-joking manner.
But, so you're saying it was perfectly okay for the FBI to reopen the investigation ten days before the election?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)