LMAO Jim Acosta from CNN LOL

[koriwhat]

Seriously. He's like the kid who says "I pwomise" for a loophole.

yep but he sure is demanding of others while he tries to wiggle his way out of everything asked of him. that's why he's pavTHETIC. a demanding, en led, egotistical loser who deserves nothing from not one of us here.

[Chris]

The part where CNN encouraged physical attacks against Trump administration officials.

That's easy Pavlov. She never said that. Did you have anything else you were struggling with Pavlov?

[Chris]

Chris, answer post #167.

Answered. Did you have something that you were struggling with Reck?

[Spurtacular]

Answered. Did you have something that you were struggling with Reck?

Besides coming to terms with his gender dysphoria?

[Pavlov]

"Sure" leaves the slightest bit of wiggle room.

No. It does not.

[Chris]

Besides coming to terms with his gender dysphoria?

[Pavlov]

That's easy Pavlov. She never said that. Did you have anything else you were struggling with Pavlov?

That's exactly what your tweet says, Chris.


lol more fake news from Chris

[koriwhat]

No. It does not.

why do you keep avoiding a simple "yes or no" ? we're only playing the game by your rules so play along pavTHETIC.

[Spurtacular]

No. It does not.

You're using disengaged language and what you could ineptly argue is a double negative later on? At some point, you should consider growing a pair.

[Pavlov]

why do you keep avoiding a simple "yes or no" ? we're only playing the game by your rules so play along pavTHETIC.

It's fun watching you guys try to pretend "sure" somehow means "no."

You're using disengaged language and what you could ineptly argue is a double negative later on?

No.

[Reck]

Way to back up your man, tranny.

Derp, why do you romanticize every single post? That's just as bad as your unnesesary obligatory emoticons. Be intelligent for one.

I'm just cruous where Chris got that CNN encourage people to physically attack Trump workers.

[Reck]

Answered. Did you have something that you were struggling with Reck?

You didn't. You posted a tweet with the wild claim.

Just admit you rarely ever read what you post. Your bot like behavior never compells you to check if what you're posting ever makes sense.

[koriwhat]

It's fun watching you guys try to pretend "sure" somehow means "no."

no one was pretending it meant anything other than you're too pussy to answer "Yes or No" to a simple question asked of you. you jumping to conclusions is your own stupidity.

[Pavlov]

no one was pretending it meant anything other than you're too pussy to answer "Yes or No" to a simple question asked of you. you jumping to conclusions is your own stupidity.

All the times you said "sure" have you ever meant "no"?

[Chris]

Derp, why do you romanticize every single post? That's just as bad as your unnesesary obligatory emoticons. Be intelligent for one.

I'm just cruous where Chris got that CNN encourage people to physically attack Trump workers.

Brian Stelter suggested that the Republican nominee may be inciting violence which could last beyond the election.

"He’s dangerous..."



"For a long time, people treated Donald Trump like he was a joke. Right now, it’s a very serious drama. That speech was paranoid and that speech was dangerous. It was a speech driven with hatred. A speech driven with contempt. Railing against bankers, and corporations, and the media, and this grand conspiracy that somehow he has only been able to connect the dots of. It sounded a lot like a dog whistle to a lot of people."



"If there is violence and unrest after election day, I think we now know why based on the hatred dripping out of that man’s mouth."

[Chris]

You didn't. You posted a tweet with the wild claim.

Just admit you rarely ever read what you post. Your bot like behavior never compells you to check if what you're posting ever makes sense.

Nah. You didn't watch or read anything and decided to dog pile. That's you.

[Pavlov]

Chris failing hard.

[koriwhat]

All the times you said "sure" have you ever meant "no"?

i don't care about what kind of you are pavTHETIC. you do this daily here so own up to your own rules and answer with a simple yes or no. no need for maybes, sures, etc... yes or no? easy, right?

[Pavlov]

i don't care about what kind of you are pavTHETIC. you do this daily here so own up to your own rules and answer with a simple yes or no. no need for maybes, sures, etc... yes or no? easy, right?

What's your question?

[Chris]

Pavlov takes another L. Tries to talk himself out of it.

[Pavlov]

Pavlov takes another L. Tries to talk himself out of it.

You still haven't shown CNN calling for physical attacks on Trump administration officials.

[Spurtacular]

No.

I'm sure you understand the concept of disengaged language. But it's easy to do it and pretend otherwise when you're a sociopath.

[koriwhat]

What's your question?

i didn't ask one. i am simply waiting and watching your show of dodging a question when asked to play by your rules.

[Spurtacular]

All the times you said "sure" have you ever meant "no"?

That's not the implication anyone was making.

Chump doing the false narrative thing. Par.

[Pavlov]

I'm sure you understand the concept of disengaged language. But it's easy to do it and pretend otherwise when you're a sociopath.

Concepts are easy.

You're simply wrong.