Reply With Quote
Sure, but he just said the same thing I do.
lol
You're gonna have to take a seat in the peanut gallery. The No's is more interesting than you.
Sure, but he just said the same thing I do.
lol
Racism is a universal term, no matter the subject. The question was clear and the answer was too. Those who believe racism exists, know it's a form of discrimination, and it's bad. Logically, it follows that either you don't believe racism exists, or you don't think it's bad (which, in practice, is the same thing). But if you had a change of heart, that's fine too. As I stated, I make no personal judgements. You wouldn't be the only self-admitted racist (if you still are) here, tbh...Yes, and I was speaking on a subject in which racism was being branded as a term without any actual proof. That's a long leap to say that I said racism doesn't exist. It seems to me that you want to fulfill your own "confirmation bias" to put it generously.
You can stand by your bull all you want; it doesn't mean you don't come off smelling like bull .
On the topic of what I wrote, I think it's pretty clear and in line with what other posters already pointed out. If somebody else deems it bull , they can certainly let it be known.
I have nothing personal against D'Souza or Moore, their stuff just doesn't pass a cursory history test.
Does white on minority racism exist?
Yes or no.
He troling and all (a bit); but you been PMS'ing all day. He has more dignity than that.
I simply ask you a question you will do anything in your power to not answer because it will apparently destroy you and your entire world for the reasons El Nono explained so eloquently and politely.
It's stunningly easy to find such a question with you. You're really, really sensitive and get super defensive about it.
Sure, if it had been presented that Ozil had been discriminated based on his race, then that would be racism. That was not the case. And if you look at that thread, you'll see that multiple times I asked for people to present such examples of racism. Nobody ever did.
I wasn't just making a joke when I said to have your seat in the peanut gallery. You're not that interesting. The No's is more interesting even when he's notched his troll mode up a couple notches. Deal with it.
Like I said, you'll make any excuse to avoid simple questions that will end your world.
Your L on this has been explained. I know this is the part where you comeback with the "win the internet" stuff. But if you don't like it, then be consistent in your posting. Don't say you haven't watched and then laugh like you have an opinion on something you admitted to not watching. It's hacky. But then again, you're having a pretty hacky day, I guess.
I'm not making excuses. I'm telling you straight-up that I'm currently zoning you out.
You're doing such a great job of it immediately responding to my posts.I'm not making excuses. I'm telling you straight-up that I'm currently zoning you out.
You're really sensitive.
'Substantively' zoning you out. I have no problem taking a moment to slap you.You're doing such a great job of it immediately responding to my posts.
You're really sensitive.
As long as you can avoid answering simple questions that would destroy your world, you'll do and say anything -- "substantively."'Substantively' zoning you out. I have no problem taking a moment to slap you.
lol
You presume you're that important; you're not.
What are you babbling about? Did you just found out who Dinesh D'Souza or Michael Moore are? How many Michael Moore films you watched to know he's a hack? BTW, a synopsis (as opposed to an opinion piece) works just as well.
Just don't insult people's intelligence, like the D'Souza attempts to do. The current Democratic party has nothing to do with the Southern Democrats from the Lincoln era, no matter if D'Souza or Moore tell you otherwise. It really takes an abject ignorant or idiot, and really, I don't care if the photography on the movie is spectacular, that's not what the movie and the absolutely re ed message is about. It's not being presented as fiction either, as far as I know.
There really isn't much more to argue about this, tbh... and my day is fine.
You're the one responding without fail.
Well given that I said all along that I don't think that it's not a fun subject matter for a debate, I cannot say I'm all that inclined to argue.
But to give a brief rebuttal all the same, it was white Republicans who went to war to free the blacks. Sure, many of them were "racist" by today's standards. My point all along would've been that it's a rich amalgam of elements and that neither party has the high ground on this or some perfectly wonderful story about avoiding racism.
Does that make you important?
You're conferring it on me by default.
So responses to you makes you important
You've effectively explained why you beg for so much attention
Nope, your responding to me incessantly simply proves I'm important to you.
You're "incessantly" responding to me. I must be quite important to you by your own definition.
I never claimed I was trying to tune you out.
You did.
But you couldn't help it.
Now respond to this forcefully with emojis.
Good luck getting an answer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
