Reply With Quote
Is he her direct opponent in an election?
If no then I agree with her tbqh
This is not boxing niga
Hahaha. I'm not surprised that she turned down the offer to debate Shapiro as it certainly wouldn't help her, heck,I wouldn't debate him over my real name, but her method of declining is a headline in itself.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...mpression=true
"Just like catcalling, I don’t owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions," she said of the demands that she debate Shapiro. "And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel en led to one."
Ask me to provide sources? I don't appreciate your catcalling......
Is he her direct opponent in an election?
If no then I agree with her tbqh
This is not boxing niga
Conservative and notorious racist Ben Shapiro
When it begins with that, you should stop reading. Also, when are people going to learn that spreading misinformation is almost as bad as starting it?
The comparison and response are obviously stupid. So is the request for a debate.
Yeah I wish Trump would stop doing that
She is truly the Socialist Boogeyman of conservative nightmares. You guys can’t shut up about her.
Maybe
Shes the new Obama
Problem is last Obama united them so powerfully that Trump got elected
LeBron has so far ignored my lawn darts challenge. He is obviously shook.
he wouldn't even take my 10 G, what is he afraid of?
this and this
true, but to be fair a lot of posters here (namely RG and bouts) have no room to speak, since they go find random republican candidates from random regional elections and then use their misdeeds as proof of republicans being horrible people, etc
The whole premise of aligning morality with political affiliation is comical.
agreed
I think a direct benefit of term limits would be bringing a more ethical politician/judge to the Capitol. It's naive to think that you become a fed-level politician without having been morally compromised by party pressure and/or lobbyists.
Once you get some tenure, the pressure to stay within party lines/mandates placed by party leaders/cliques/lobbyists etc. -basically keeping the nice job and income you got- really compromises the reason you've become a politician in the first place; acting in the best interests of your cons uents.
Unfortunately, we'll never rid ourselves of the lobbyists that are inherently wrong with American politics and we can never eliminate greed from the human nature, but you sure can stem the issue by shortening terms so you either try and move up the ladder or you do your best and serve your people and return to civilian life and the greed urges will still be satisfied by the increased income being a Fed-level politician brings to your earning power/resume.
She really is such a ing re
Then she can be president.
Btw... I think Ben Shapiro is funny...
Bueler
Bueler
Meh the Republicans have been claiming moral high ground since the Clinton presidency, so they deserve to eat some after doing a 180 now that their party is run by a sociopath.
ty comparison. She didn't ignore. Try again.
She's the Trump of the left. She is such an idiot yet is proclaimed as breath of fresh air. Left can't stop talking about the dumb Trump said prior to election also.
She’s a fairly toothless congresswoman yelling into a very small echo chamber, not the ing Pesident.
She declared bankruptcy four times, had a fraudulent college, colluded with foreign enemies, bragged about committing sexual assault, and lies about everything under the sun?
Yeah, you keep pushing that narrative.
She ignored him, he called her out for ignoring him, then she commented. It's literally what the OP is about.
Only in the sense that conservatives are obsessed with her.
Talking about someone = obsessed
Lol that's rich
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
