Reply With Quote
Is koriwhat the one with the calf tats? If so, why would anyone ever take anything he says seriously. Probably has a trump tatoo at this point.
Those two are in conflict.
If you have most of them on ignore, how do you know what they're saying, let alone to whom.
Is koriwhat the one with the calf tats? If so, why would anyone ever take anything he says seriously. Probably has a trump tatoo at this point.
history... it's called recognizing patterns. you're too dense to even comprehend such common sense.
nah, just a hrc tattoo of that eating babies.
Last edited by koriwhat; 08-16-2018 at 04:37 PM.
You keep reading our posts.
Statement from Senate Intel Chairman Richard Burr on Comments by Former CIA Director John Brennan
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Senator Richard Burr (R-NC), Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, issued the following statement on comments made in The New York Times by former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan:
“Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know as fact that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power. If Director Brennan’s statement is based on intelligence he received while still leading the CIA, why didn’t he include it in the Intelligence Community Assessment released in 2017? If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it cons utes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not The New York Times.
“If, however, Director Brennan’s statement is purely political and based on conjecture, the president has full authority to revoke his security clearance as head of the Executive Branch.”
https://www.burr.senate.gov/press/re...-john-brennan-
wtf Burr defending trump
lol no one is questioning the president's authority to revoke clearance.
whoosh
... except that nsa/cia/fbi have procedures for revoking clearance, or for firing someone (Strzok).
Trash punished both for criticizing him, for "disloyalty", when their loyalty is sworn to the Cons ution and laws, not to any ing President.
No, I get that you're trying to justify Trump's actions.
You can't criticize him for anything.
...
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-17-2018 at 11:29 PM.
Former Nixon Era Prosecutor Calls Trump’s Attack On Brennan ‘More Serious Than Watergate’
Former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks said
Donald Trump’s push to strip the security clearance of former intelligence officials is
eerily similar to the tactics used by Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal.
“It is exactly the same thing,” Wine-Banks said during an interview with MSNBC’s Ali Velshi.
“It is something that he didn’t get away with during the Watergate era.”
On Wednesday, Trump revoked former CIA director John Brennan’s security clearance as political payback for Brennan’s public criticisms of the president.
Jill Wine-Banks explained how this behavior mirrors Nixon’s, and she said Trump should be held accountable in the same way.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/08...iticus+USA+%29
There's no more accountability in USA, unless you're non-white, non-male, and don't have $Ms to buy your way out.
..
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-17-2018 at 11:30 PM.
Have any Repugs come against Trash for political firings, political purges?
Brennan just got ethered...
Yeah, TSA tried that.
Good stuff
Probably best Trump move in a few months
Ha
Exactly. What would be weird is if they didn't (or, rather, claim they didn't) have them. This idea that you can't work for the government if you hold a political opinion or express it, regardless of the sensitiveness of the area you work on, is asinine.
If that translates into criminal conduct, then we have a justice system to deal with that.
/thread
Wow Trump did something and Chris agrees with it this time!
"Trump’s politicizing and weaponizing of something as important as security clearances
could discourage those currently serving from doing so.
And that is exactly what the president wants."
"The real victim here is not Mr. Brennan,
who will get along fine without his security clearance,
but the national security of the United States and
its democratic norms.
National security is harmed because
administration officials and members of Congress benefit when they can draw upon the wisdom and experience of long-serving public servants such as Mr. Brennan.
Mr. Trump has threatenedeight other former officials ,
and even one current official, with similar treatment. "
"At this point, one might
ask why the White House even bothers to invent cover stories
that the president himself will inevitably contradict.
Trash obviously cherishes — and actively cultivates —
his reputation as someone who will work to crush those who dare defy him."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
gregg jarrett
the guy who said "omg why hasn't hillary faced a grand jury" literally 1 day before mueller impaneled a grand jury for the russia probe, at which point he said "grand juries are an undemocratic farce"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions