Reply With Quote
One is still being investigated.Orthe time Hillary claimed she lost because of Putin
OMG just checked and she was Sec of State January 2009
she went 2 months emailing US State business in clear text
wow
One is still being investigated.Orthe time Hillary claimed she lost because of Putin
Point to the evidence you have. Thanks.going through those do ents is very interesting. thanks for the links
this is very interesting to me:
- Investigation determined Clinton's clintonemail.com email traffic was potentially vulnerable to compromise when she first because using her personal account in January 2009. It was not until late March 2009, when the Pagliano Server was set up and an SSL certificate was acquired for the clintonemail.com domain.
- FBI investigation and forensic analysis did not find evidence confirming that Clinton's email server systems were compromised by cyber means. The FBI's inability to recover all server equipment and the lack of complete server log data for the relevant time period limited the FBI's forensic analysis of the server systems. As a result, FBI byber analysis relied in large par, on witness statements, email correspondence and related forensic content found on other devices
Looks like FBI analysis was very limited as they did not have all equipment used during that time.
interesting stuff thanks!
and the other is on ChardonnayOne is still being investigated.
And the other isn’t going to Prison. Unlike Putin’s toyand the other is on Chardonnay
hater falling for the ropadope again
I hope Trump goes to prison. Hate that idiotAnd the other isn’t going to Prison. Unlike Putin’s toy
but LOL Hillary still
The fact the FBI couldn't get it means those emails got deleted well and good. The FBI said they did not find evidence that indicated her servers got hacked. That means no one got in there. Not the FBI, not the chinese not nobody.going through those do ents is very interesting. thanks for the links
this is very interesting to me:
- Investigation determined Clinton's clintonemail.com email traffic was potentially vulnerable to compromise when she first because using her personal account in January 2009. It was not until late March 2009, when the Pagliano Server was set up and an SSL certificate was acquired for the clintonemail.com domain.
- FBI investigation and forensic analysis did not find evidence confirming that Clinton's email server systems were compromised by cyber means. The FBI's inability to recover all server equipment and the lack of complete server log data for the relevant time period limited the FBI's forensic analysis of the server systems. As a result, FBI byber analysis relied in large par, on witness statements, email correspondence and related forensic content found on other devices
Looks like FBI analysis was very limited as they did not have all equipment used during that time.
interesting stuff thanks!
OMG just checked and she was Sec of State January 2009
she went 2 months emailing US State business in clear text
wow
Hater failed. Again.
/thread
Move over Muh Russia its Muh China time!
"The FBI's inability to recover all server equipment "
that is not referring to deleted emails. My point is it is very interesting FBI has that disclaimer at top
No evidence. It’s like these sum es let loose a few drops of drool right on the keyboard before pressing post.
That's because Hillary and her people destroyed it. But that doesn't matter because the FBI was able to obtained most of the emails. If the Chinese got anything, do you think they would have needed physical possesion of the actual server?
Why the insults? I respect your opinion friend. Apologies for finding those FBI statements intersting.
please lets not go to insults and keep ot civil
But its not about the emails only. Its about doing forensics on the equipment itself. Not just about deleted emails friendThat's because Hillary and her people destroyed it. But that doesn't matter because the FBI was able to obtained most of the emails. If the Chinese got anything, do you think they would have needed physical possesion of the actual server?
What for? Emails are electronic. I dont know what the gain would be to study a server from the outside. It's just a piece of machinery, not a safe.
Servers have logs friend. That are not part of the emails themselves. The operating system is also very important. Even the tirmware is important as malware can even infect firmware
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig...oreign-emails/
A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign en y and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.
The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.
“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign en y unrelated to Russia,” he added.
Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.
Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”
“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can do ent that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”
Australia And New Zealand Are Ground Zero For Chinese Influence
He then points out Australia's federal police building and to a compound in the middle, where China built its embassy.
"They picked that spot, and they have a lot of clout, they have a vast compound, and they kind of get what they want around here," he says.
When Hamilton, a professor at Charles Sturt University, first tried to publish his new book, Silent Invasion: China's Influence in Australia, the fear of China's Communist Party crept in, he says.
Hamilton's original publisher, Allen and Unwin, informed him last November that
it was canceling the book's publication because it feared legal action from what it called "Beijing's agents of influence."
the central thesis of Hamilton's book — that China's Communist Party has infiltrated Australia — but not one he expected to have to deal with personally.
"It's a massive red flag," says Hamilton.
"And if Australia capitulates on this question, in other words, no book seriously critical of [the] Chinese Communist Party will be published in Australia.
I mean, this essentially means we've sacrificed our democratic freedoms."
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/02/62724...nfluence?sc=tw
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
