TSA. I’m waiting
any comment on Russian funds being funneled to the Trump campaign?
TSA. I’m waiting
Part One: Never happened!
Part Two: Never happened! but theoretically if it happened, they did it in a way that technically isn’t illegal!
Part Three: Maybe it happened but still not illegal!
Part Four: What about when Hillary did it!!!!!!
That is ad hominem, you ing idiot.
You implied he was less credible, because "some reason".
[TSA answers Pavlov instead]
Hmm that doesn't seem to be an answer to any of my reasonable questions about what you are trying to assert is true. We have constant indications of a thinly staffed, overwhelmed administration.
Most recently:
White House faces brain drain at perilous moment
https://www.apnews.com/b780699b037640dda5b39f687f6a5fc7
Again, just so it doesn't get lost:
What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?
Yes.
FARA violations
Also.
“The charges against Patten were filed by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington rather than by Mueller. Mueller’s team likewise referred an investigation into Ukraine political work by other Manafort associates, lobbyist Tony Podesta and Vin Weber, to prosecutors in New York.”
any comment on how you think this sends Trump to prison?
djohn2oo8. I’m waiting.
Patten has agreed to cooperate with Mueller.
TSA
Trump inaugural committee breaking federal law in accepting foreign donations. And how’s there’s a direct tie to Russian money there. Guess you can’t claim “no ties to Russia”![]()
Still waiting on this one.
response: Trump knows EVERYTHING and has the whole time. He's just teasing the swamp.
You've been ignoring my question for pages, chicken .
How did the Trump inaugural committee break the law djohn? Do you not know what a straw buyer is?
[TSA answers Pavlov instead]
What is your best evidence that Donald Trump reads and understands complex materials?
It’s a stupid ing question and has no relevance to Trump’s access to everything.
i know exactly what it is. It is you who needs to look up the definition
![]()
You think the real buyer didn't want anyone on team Trump to know he was actually giving the money?
He just wanted to make the straw buyer look fancy?
It isn't a stupid question. It is requiring you to prove one of the primary grounding assumptions of your entire argument.
If you know your argument is bull , I can see why you might not want to try and prove it.
Sophist.
Prove your assertion that "Trump knows everything" by showing that the underlying assumption, i.e. he actually can read and understand everything going on in a complex, multi-threaded, multi-tiered investigation, is a reasonable one.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)