Reply With Quote
Trump slurper.
don't worry about that obese loser who's drowning himself in sugar and carbs. shortround.
... who's never seen crack or has even ever known a crackhead.
yeah bruh, you got me.
bet you've seen mickeyd's, whataburger, high cholesterol, clogged arteries, etc though.
Make some more fat jokes...who's never seen crack
it's not joking when it's your reality kim.Make some more fat jokes
Make some more fat jokes
oh, you're not rooting for judge Kavanaugh?
Before he was even done with the Republican primaries he said he had no idea who David Duke was. Problem is he had written a whole opinion about him for a magazine which was published. That was the first time I realized he lied even about insignificant stuff.
So you want to continue?
mono is so fat his blood type is Ragu.Make some more fat jokes
2/10, but par for the course for you.
He took the rocky road blood type joke and removed the humor part lol
Also he thinks youre italian apparently
Source it, son. I know you have your own problems with the truth. And none of that matters to me; the media was trying to paint Trump as a white supremacist and he was basically telling them to off.
I can't say I strongly "root" for him. But he is better than the jokes of judges that Obama put in place.
a qualified yes is a yes. so long as the liar is on your side, everything's good.
Ex-Senate researcher walks MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow through evidence that Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly lied under oath
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow read through Graves detailed story in Slate, revealing that when Kavanaugh was asked by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to answer whether he lied under oath, he knowingly lied about it again.
She went so far as to say that one email included the subject line “spying,” which she called a pretty definitive clue.
“Even if Kavanaugh could claim that he didn’t have any hint at the time he received the emails that these do ents were of suspect provenance—which I personally find implausible—there is no reasonable way for him to assert honestly that he had no idea what they were after the revelation of the theft,” Graves continued.
“Any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly, someone as smart as Kavanaugh would have too.”
Instead,
he lied, and he’s about to become a Supreme Court Justice.
“And so one of the memos I know personally contains page after page, paragraph after paragraph of my research,
the research I prepared for Sen. Patrick Leahy, research on the most intense fight we were having about the nomination which involved the legal precedents,
the historical precedents for the memos that the Senate Democrats have requested,” Graves continued.
She said that
Miranda then handed everything over to Kavanaugh.
“And so I am convinced by that and some of the other do ents provided that
Brett Kavanaugh lied repeatedly under oath to the United States Senate about these matters,”
she said.
“Also for the integrityof the United States Senate itself.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/ex-...e+Raw+Story%29
Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-11-2018 at 12:17 AM.
There is now 4-5 confirmed lies under oath.Ex-Senate researcher walks MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow through evidence that Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly lied under oath
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow read through Graves detailed story in Slate, revealing that when Kavanaugh was asked by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to answer whether he lied under oath, he knowingly lied about it again.
She went so far as to say that one email included the subject line “spying,” which she called a pretty definitive clue.
“Even if Kavanaugh could claim that he didn’t have any hint at the time he received the emails that these do ents were of suspect provenance—which I personally find implausible—there is no reasonable way for him to assert honestly that he had no idea what they were after the revelation of the theft,” Graves continued.
“Any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly, someone as smart as Kavanaugh would have too.”
Instead,
he lied, and he’s about to become a Supreme Court Justice.
“And so one of the memos I know personally contains page after page, paragraph after paragraph of my research,
the research I prepared for Sen. Patrick Leahy, research on the most intense fight we were having about the nomination which involved the legal precedents,
the historical precedents for the memos that the Senate Democrats have requested,” Graves continued.
She said that
Miranda then handed everything over to Kavanaugh.
“And so I am convinced by that and some of the other do ents provided that
Brett Kavanaugh lied repeatedly under oath to the United States Senate about these matters,”
she said.
“Also for the integrity
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/ex-...e+Raw+Story%29
You know what this means, right?
Confirmation on schedule for Thursday!
Amerikkka.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a military lawyer, dismisses Mueller convictions: Lying to the FBI is not a ‘big event’
defended President Donald Trump by saying that lying to the FBI is not a “big event.”
the South Carolina senator also said that he was
“disappointed” that the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails had been closed.
“You got to look at the substance of what people pled to,” the military lawyer opined.
“Some people pled to lying to the FBI like [George Papadopoulos] got two weeks in jail.”
“I don’t see that as a big event,” Graham added.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/sen...e+Raw+Story%29
false eqivalence
campaign "coffee boy" lying is same a SCOTUS candidate lying multiple times
Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-16-2018 at 11:00 AM.
Kavanaugh Misrepresented His Own Opinions to Senate Judiciary Committee
If a nominee cannot even honestly describe his own opinions in sworn testimony, and
instead misrepresents or distorts them to help win confirmation,
how can he be trusted with a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land?
In at least half a dozen cases,
Kavanaugh misrepresented or distorted his own opinions on the DC Circuit,
either in testimony or in written responses to Committee questions
both before and after the hearing.
What Americans want most in a Supreme Court justice is someone with an open mind who is honest and can be trusted.
Senators, including those who have not yet decided how to vote on the nomination, have expressed similar views.
But if a nominee cannot even honestly describe his own opinions in sworn testimony,
and instead misrepresents or distorts them to help win confirmation,
how can he be trusted with a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land?
It is clear Brett Kavanaugh cannot.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2...?cd-origin=rss
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
