Reply With Quote
actually. I'm curious.
what do you think about these, Chris?
you disagree?
what's your take Chris?
what do you think about corporate welfare and bailing out insolvent banks?
actually. I'm curious.
what do you think about these, Chris?
trust-busting?
public health laws?
You are pulling the ¨Dont name HRC¨ card, what are you hiding?
Never said DJT should be exonerated, but at the same time he used his own resources, not the public administration as a catapult to make a -ton of money.
public schools for ******s?
separate but equal of course.
He used US bankruptcy laws to screw banks and investors.
DJT also has a long track record of stiffing contractors.
I'm sure you'll try to apologize for all that too.
He used the laws, is that illegal???
Nope, but you just apologized for it.
It isn't illegal.
I think ending the Federal Banking System would alleviate the majority of the problems we have with corruption within the government.
Welfare needs reform and required drug testing.
I'm also for ending the income tax and overhauling the IRS.
If is not illegal then why apologize?Nope, but you just apologized for it.
It isn't illegal.
Business have risks.
Welcome to America Winehole.
Drug testing already flopped. Expense outweighed the fraud abated everywhere it was measured.
Getting rid of fractional reserve banking is a non-starter. No one in power will listen to you.
Good luck repealing the 16th Amendment.
The IRS might be reformed, but where will we get the money to pay for wars, domestic surveillance, corporate welfare and en lements? you want to renege on the promises of the USG?
It ain't the 19th century. we can't rely on the customs house anymore.
Last edited by Winehole23; 09-13-2018 at 02:14 AM.
god if Chris ain't all about a unicorn with rainbow ice cream farts
DJT screwed em hard. Once upon a time, he'd be ruined because he ruined his rep.
Now we elect him president.
what does any of this have to do with socialism?
Psss you make it sound like he is Bernie Madoff, who also was a democrat donor.
The Clintons prey on the weak
The strong have for ages preyed on the weak, but the Clintons have mastered the art of disguised begging. Something horrible happens and help is desperately needed, but the scammers are always first to show up to reap the benefits of those in need. The Clintons do make it look good though. They walk through the streets surrounded by those that need assistance, take some great pictures, and then they raise tons of money.
That money is then spent on travel, salaries, fund-raising, overhead expenses, and various other things it takes to run a scam. In 2013 according to Charity Watchdog the Clinton Foundation raised over $140 million, but only gave $9 million of that in actual direct aid. That fact alone goes a long way toward showing the poor, minority, female, and middle class voters in the United States just how good they would have it with Hillary Clinton in the oval office.
Thats not screwing people´s good intentions to help those in need.
I mean, if you were against socialism, you'd say, get rid of it, not, give em a test.
That was your question. Try to keep up.what do you think about corporate welfare and bailing out insolvent banks?
talking about someone else. you can't help it, Mikeanaro
um, you never said what you think
you can attempt to respond or deflect Chris, everyone can read for himself.
You mean, the ¨clean¨ people you support? how is that out of the equation?
Do they ceased to exist in this world or something?
you have no idea who I support.
you can check my trend of posting. I dare you to find a single post supporting HRC.
for the record, I don't think anyone is clean.
also for the record, I think we have two pro-business parties screwing us over in oh-so-very slightly different ways.
I don't trust either one of them.
red or blue, we still end up with purple assholes
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions