How exactly were these death threats delivered? Through her lawyer?
I'm not afraid of the FBI investigating. I'm just not for delaying the vote so the Democrats can try and block the confirmation before the midterms. Just like you don't care about Ford's allegations, you just want the Democrats to block the confirmation. If you cared about rape, you'd have been condemning the democratic part for the last, what 40 years, for being the party of Kennedy and the Party of Clinton.
There are more women Senators, mostly Democrats because Republicans don't seem to like women representatives, so that would not fly.
That is one thing you are right about.
This entire episode will, yet again, outline to women how much the GOP is the party of, by, and for, men.
As a Democrat I can only shake my head at how dumb and churlish this is making the GOP seem in general. It's like there is a target painted on y'alls foot, and someone just handed you a loaded revolver.
no biggie if the FBI can't investigate, there's no federal crime at issue.
let the woman speak to the Senate, then Senators can make up their minds, if they haven't already made them up.
she was doxxed. please try to keep up.
I just said that wasn't what I was doing. Why do you feel the need to lie about that?
You outline how an investigation is done. Persuade me how the FBI can magically verify a story that doesn't have a location, a date, a time, details before the incident, details after the incident, and there are only 4 persons involved, 3 of which say it is false, and only the accuser says it is true, but has no details, just a story. You give a good road map for how an investigation can be made, and then I'll tell you if it makes sense to stall the vote so it will happen.
Like I've said, let the local authorities investigate. They actually have jurisdiction. The FBI does not. No federal crime is alleged.
I wonder how glib you'd be if someone in your family was receiving multiple death threats.
But hey, it's politics, so dehumanize her as much as you can, right?
Hey genius, her personal information was posted here by an asshole. You think maybe it was posted elsewhere too?
Are you just acting like you're an idiot?
Does it really matter? You are gong there? really?
smh
disgusting.
Exactly. This is all about stalling, not about getting to the "truth."
When did being doxxed become a death threat?
She got doxxed on SPURSTALK, and CC has the ing gall to ask where the threats are coming from.
I'm not sure how far your head needs to be up your ass to try to claim any kind of ignorance about this, but he's trying to set a record.
Yes you have stated your fear of an FBI investigation and demanded they never investigate.
We get it.
you, CC. You're a piece of .
You anic asshat.
You literally asked how she was getting death threats.
The entire ing internet had her phone number and address.
Are you seriously that dense, or are you just that good at playing stupid?
And I get that you want an investigation by the FBI that lasts until November.
Nope. I'll take one that lasts as long as Hill's or even less.
Easy.
Already said, If she really got death threats the idiots should be arrested and prosecuted.
So you think she's lying about that too.
Predictable asshole.
Actually, she didn't say it. Her activist attorney did.
there's probably no way of getting at the truth.
in an adversarial system such as ours, sometimes the best you can do is let both sides have a say and let the deciders decide.
or, if you happen to be in the political majority, you can use the rules to exclude things you don't like.
So you think the attorney is lying after the client was doxxed.
Predictable asshole.
Statistics do matter, quite a bit. The multi-trillion dollar insurance industry, and pretty much all scientific research depend on that.
Another easily disproved idea and assertion.
The evidence we have is her claim, and her past statements. That is evidence.
Whether or not it "is a perfect story to hang up a judicial nomination" is irrelevant to the underlying truth of the claim.
This is a logical fallacy, i.e. ad hominem.
So, you have one lie, i.e. I think what I think because "democrat", one disproven statement, i.e. "statistics don't matter", and one flawed logical argument, i.e. "perfect story".
Not a good track record, if your desire is to get to the truth.
Do you always rely on lies and false logic to determine what is true?
there used to a certain amount of dignity attached to you, cowboy.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote