Murray is the most important short term development, but Walker is the most important long term development because he more closely resembles the rough outline of a go-to offensive player.
I attribute the hype surrounding Murray mostly to the Spurs doing something they rarely do, which is hyping up one of their players and them having had a hand in two all-time player development cases. If he were elsewhere, it's doubtful he'd be viewed any more fondly than comparable types like Dunn and Exum.
Gotta anoint someone. Closer to Hill than Kawhi so far. But if he lives up to the hype,
the Spurs are dark horse contenders
If your team doesn't start with a superstar, you're immediately disqualified from even theoretically becoming a championship contender. That's not to be confused with having one automatically equalling contention though.
Who remembers a year ago when fans said he was 3-4 years away?
When you see talent, sometimes you just know.
I missed the part when he arrived offensively.
Unfortunately, his talent lies in the least important areas for his position/role. Without a foundational offensive skill to build off of, the roadmap to his supposedly becoming a star or borderline one, as Lowe termed it, is unclear.