Did he delete the post or was there a formatting error in your request?
It's amusing how certain posters love to float rumors, but suddenly get bashful when asked where they got them.
Did he delete the post or was there a formatting error in your request?
Many see him as biased. Not just me.
It's not an opinion either. It's just easy to dissect him. You people are highly transparant.
You, him, Darrin, Derp, ducks are all the same posters roll into one.
cd98 is also dishonest. Cant bother to look the post up but he's made several claims where he cant back up with....facts.
Called people liars, cited false stories without providing proof and used a silly argument that since he's a lawyer he's right and downright refused to owned up when he's corrected. or simply, he ran from the argument when he's losing it which is a lot.
my bad on the formatting, post is still there
cd98 really dislikes liberals in general. There's really no way you can walk out of his posts in this thread without that impression.
Does that mean he's biased? sure. Does it mean he's wrong? not at all. He's en led to his opinion and isn't the first or last to hold that position.
That said, he's been cavalier enough to admit we need to hear this woman and not jump to conclusions just yet, even if his gut feeling is that it's going to be extremely difficult for her to actually prove the allegation happened.
And in that last part, I think most people here are in agreement. I've seen percentages like 85% chance of Kavanaugh getting confirmed thrown around here. I think it's actually a bit higher, and increases as days go by.
Amen, sister!
Good recruiting, girl!
Increased to about 96% or so the last hour. He'll testify after she does which will leave a stronger impression on these senators. And by impression I mean just a handful. Kavanaugh has at least 48 votes no matter what. We're talking about convincing just 2 or 3 here.
Oh no - I thought some of us don't have brains, some write in complete sentences, some have better writing skills and some predict really well :-)
That's it? That's all you have?
lol
Go ahead and dispute any of what I just said partaining to him.
For the next time misspelled words trigger you.
Just having some fun. Bias is a matter of opinion, Reck. That's why I'm here - to hear the other side (and laugh at the little jokes).
And Federer is choking again.
And the kicker here is that he accuses you of being a sociopath.
Projection is derp's main weapon.
Ask him to count up how many times he's mentioned you in the past month.
30+ pages worth of mentions if you go into my quotes and mention profile just from him alone.![]()
"the kicker"
The tranny parameters for sociopathy
https://nypost.com/2018/09/22/how-fe...roy-kavanaugh/
I don’t know what’s really going on behind the scenes, but to think both sides aren’t doing things is naive. But I guess I’m biased bc there is no evidence of the claim and therefore, I think it’s specious.
So just to be clear. He first claimed he didn't know this woman or that any party took place but he now has calendars with notes from when he was 17 years old that "proves" he wasn't at that particular party.
17 year kept calendars of his activities for decades
What a development!
I'm not saying she is definitively lying. She jusy has no proof. And the other people involved have made her no proof story even less valuable. There isn't a history of other no proof accusations either. The idea that this should eliminate him from this position is ridiculous.
My comments like that generally directed at a recent post by someone. It also captures a general reality though.
post is still there. cd98's source was the NY Post.
Last edited by Winehole23; 09-23-2018 at 03:43 PM.
I regularly page our resident tranny on matters that pertain to him/her. My quotes/mentions don't work past page one, anyhow. Anyone crying out about a log is likely triggered.![]()
No one is crying about your compulsion.
We're laughing.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)