Nope, compulsive fits perfectly.
So, your answer is yes ISIS is a terrorist group and that you want them to be funded.
![]()
Nope, compulsive fits perfectly.
Nope.
How do they go about blocking ISIS, derp?
Explain.
You've been talking only about me nonstop since you got here today and now you're begging for personal stories.
You are obsessed with me.
Explain how.
You can't help it.
Use your words. Is Isis a terrorist group?
Yes or no.
Should ISIS payments be processed?
Yes or no.
That's your rationale?
If I go a week without mentioning them will that prove you're wrong, or is this just a convenient sociopath truth?![]()
Yes.
No.Should ISIS payments be processed?
Yes or no.
Use your words.
How do they go about blocking ISIS, derp?
Explain.
You think you can do that?
How about a year, then?
A year is overkill.
Sociopath knows his assessment has been shot down.
You've been called out.
Stop all mentions for a year since it's so easy for you.
Okay, so ISIS is a terrorist group that should have their payments blocked. Yet, you've had problem casting aspersions like this:
You love your false narratives. It was never about what payments are used for. It was about blocking the principal.
PAVthetic![]()
You didn't answer the question:
How do they go about blocking ISIS, derp?
Explain.
You're calling for your buddies to get a pass on their bull for a year.
Classic sociopath manipulation,
Your compulsion BS shot down.
You can reply to their quotes as often as you like.
Don't worry, I know you can't go that long without mentioning them. It's your compulsion after all.
This was never the issue; your compulsion has you pretending that it is.
But just to avoid your inevitable 'running' come-on, you block all known principals and subsidiaries.
Thanks for your permission to reply.
If you know that I'm compelled, then why are you too chicken to agree you're wrong after a week of proving it?
And how does PayPal determine those?
a week
OK, three months. Starting now.
Still overkill. I'll give you a month if you accept that your compulsion assertion is bull if fulfilled.
Of course it's an issue. You said they should "block all known principals and subsidiaries."
How does PayPal know them to be able to block them?
This doesn't dispute my assertion. You're pretending that it is.
Damn you're stupid. Really stupid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)