You're pretending they allow transfers between "known principals and subsidiaries."
Cuck chime-in.
You're pretending they allow transfers between "known principals and subsidiaries."
No response. No deal, then.
My response was three months.
You ran away.
Nope. Three months or live with your compulsion.
You're really stupid. No lols, no cracks. I mean seriously, you're really a moron.
Just trying to buy safe space for your buddies.
Two extra months has nothing to do with proving the compulsion factor.
I know you can't do it.
Because it's your compulsion.
Three months.
Give me a quality statement that you'll put your name to, and I'll consider granting your (overkill) parameters.
Given this bold statement, you should be able to put together a clear, comprehensive statement, then.
Stop mentioning altogether for three months.
Then you can say it's not a compulsion with credibility.
Simple.
That's not a (quality) statement, and that's me putting my name to it.
Today's sociopath
It's OK, you couldn't do it anyway.
It's your compulsion.
Let's see how long you can go without mentioning someone for kicks.
Running away.
Still trying to manipulate for safe space, too.
I understand three months is too much for you.
You simply can't do it.
You admitted it.
Bold come-ons, but you won't make a statement you'll put your name to (sociopaths don't like to admit they're wrong).
"admitted it"; more sociopath truth.
spurraider21
What statement are you looking for?
You can't stop mentions for three months. Period.
--Pavlov
That's my statement.
First off, we were talking about mentions of tranny reck and cuck blake, not all mentions.
But I'm looking for a statement where you admit you were wrong about the compulsion and one that is solid and that doesn't give you wiggle room to pretend something else after the fact (as is your standard). Even now, look at what you're trying to call a statement.Today's sociopath.
immediate walk back.
OK, draft one for me since this is really important to you and you can't simply stop all mentions for three months without conditions and legally binding do ents.But I'm looking for a statement where you admit you were wrong about the compulsion and one that is solid and that doesn't give you wiggle room to pretend something else after the fact (as is your standard). Even now, look at what you're trying to call a statement.Today's sociopath.
Do you want to consult an attorney to make sure you're safe giving up mentioning for three months?
A psychiatrist?
I don't want you to feel you're in danger by giving up mentions for three months. You need a safe space.
No walk-back. We were discussing the mentions of reck and blake. But I can throw in everyone. It's not even a big deal.
Nope, you draft a statement in your own words that you'll then be eating. This shouldn't be too hard for you given the confidence you've displayed that you "know" I "can't" do it. And make it clear that my mentions are not a matter of compulsion, then, for after I've proved it so.
Nope, you draft it. It's important to you. These are your conditions you need met before you feel safe.
I know you can't do this either.
Suddenly, you're backing down. You talk big when nothing is on the line and then don't want to talk when it is being put on the line.![]()
I'm not backing down.
You're the one who needs some kind of legally binding statement drawn up to stop mentions for three months.
A non-insane person could just do it.
You can't.
Just further proves it's a compulsion.
Not legally binding, but certainly an ascertainable result / concession that you'll put your name to so that you can't walk it back or pretend something else as is your sociopath way (like you're trying to do even now).
Great. Make up one that meets your ever-growing list of preconditions to simply stop mentions for three months to prove you're not insane.
These are your conditions, not mine. My condition is stop mentioning for three months.
Post your list of conditions.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)